Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 9–10, pp 577–587 | Cite as

The Role of Husbands’ and Wives’ Emotional Expressivity in the Marital Relationship

  • Amy J. RauerEmail author
  • Brenda L. Volling
Article

Abstract

The current investigation was designed to examine the role of positive and negative emotional expressivity in the marital relationship. Data from 58 married couples were used to assess spouses’ levels of emotional expressivity and how these levels predicted reports of marital functioning. Regression analyses indicated that positive emotional expressivity had limited influence on marital functioning. Negative expressivity, however, had a strong impact on marital love, conflict, and ambivalence. Post-hoc analyses revealed significant differences between pairings in which the husband was high in negative expressivity, irrespective of wives’ negative emotional expressivity, and pairings in which both partners were low in negative emotional expressivity. These findings are discussed with respect to previous research that suggests that wives’ emotional expressivity is the major determinant of marital functioning.

Key Words

emotional expressivity marriage gender 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acitelli, L. K., Kenny, D. A., & Weiner, D. (2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8, 167–185.Google Scholar
  2. Alberts, J. K. (1988). An analysis of couples’ conversational complaints. Communication Monographs, 55, 184–197.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, M. G., & Wood, W. (2000). Women, men, and positive emotions: A social role interpretation. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 189–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, K., & Cattell, R. B. (1972). Real and perceived similarities in personality between spouses: Test of “likeness” versus “completeness” theories. Psychological Reports, 31, 15–18.Google Scholar
  5. Braiker, H., & Kelley, H. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brody, L. R. (1993). On understanding gender differences in the expression of emotion: Gender roles, socialization, and language. In S. L. Ablon, D. Brown, E. J. Khantzian, & J. E. Mack (Eds.), Human feelings: Explorations in affect development and meaning (pp. 87–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cancian, F. M., & Gordon, S. L. (1988). Change emotion norms in marriage: Love and anger in U.S. women’s magazines since 1900. Gender and Society, 2, 308–342.Google Scholar
  8. Carstensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140–149.Google Scholar
  9. Dryer, D. C., & Horowitz, L. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 592–603.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., & Spinrad, T. L. (1998). Parental socialization of emotion. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 241–273.Google Scholar
  11. Feeney, J. A. (2002). Attachment, marital interaction, and relationship satisfaction: A diary study. Personal Relationships, 9, 39–55.Google Scholar
  12. Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Callan, V. J. (1994). Attachment style, communication, and satisfaction in the early years of marriage. In K. Bartholomew (Ed.), Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 269–308). Bristol, PA: Kingsley.Google Scholar
  13. Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Roberts, N. (1998). Emotion, attachment, and satisfaction in close relationships. In P. A. Anderson (Ed.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 473–505). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fischer, A. H., Mosquera, P. M. R., & van Vianen, A. E. M. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4, 87–94.Google Scholar
  15. Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427–434.Google Scholar
  16. Garside, R. B., & Klimes-Dougan, B. (2002). Socialization of discrete negative emotions: Gender differences and links with psychological distress. Sex Roles, 47, 115–128.Google Scholar
  17. Geiss, S. K., & O’Leary, K. D. (1981). Therapist ratings of frequency and severity of marital problems: Implications for research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 515–520.Google Scholar
  18. Gill, D. S., Christensen, A., & Fincham, F. D. (1999). Predicting marital satisfaction from behavior: Do all roads really lead to Rome? Personal Relationships, 6, 369–387.Google Scholar
  19. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1998). Mapping the domain of expressivity: Multimethod evidence for a hierarchical model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 170–191.Google Scholar
  20. Halberstadt, A. G. (1986). Family socialization of emotional expression and nonverbal communication styles and skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 827–836.Google Scholar
  21. Halberstadt, A. G., Cassidy, J., Stifter, C. A., Parke, R. D., & Fox, N. A. (1995). Self-expressiveness within the family context: Psychometric support for a new measure. Psychological Assessment, 7, 93–103.Google Scholar
  22. Halford, W. K., Hahlweg, K., & Dunne, M. (1990). The cross-cultural consistency of marital communication associated with marital distress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 487–500.Google Scholar
  23. Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703.Google Scholar
  24. Lippert, T., & Prager, K. J. (2001). Daily experiences of intimacy: A study of couples. Personal Relationships, 8, 283–298.Google Scholar
  25. Noller, P., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Marital communication in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 832–843.Google Scholar
  26. Notarius, C. I., & Johnson, J. S. (1982). Emotional expression in husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 483–489.Google Scholar
  27. Roberts, L. J., & Krokoff, L. J. (1990). A time-series analysis of withdrawal, hostility, and displeasure in satisfied and dissatisfied marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 95–105.Google Scholar
  28. Searle, B., & Meara, N. M. (1999). Affective dimensions of attachment styles: Exploring self-reported attachment style, gender, and emotional experience among college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 147–158.Google Scholar
  29. Sher, T. G., & Baucom, G. H. (1993). Marital communication: Differences among maritally distressed, depressed, and nondistressed-nondepressed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 148–153.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, D. A., Vivian, D., & O’Leary, K. D. (1990). Longitudinal prediction of marital discord from premarital expressions of affect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 790–798.Google Scholar
  31. Sprecher, S., & Sedikides, C. (1993). Gender differences in perceptions of emotionality: The case of close heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 28, 511–530.Google Scholar
  32. Volling, B. L., & Elins, J. L. (1998). Family relationships and children’s emotional adjustment as correlates of maternal and paternal differential treatment: A replication with toddler and preschool siblings. Child Development, 69, 1640–1656.Google Scholar
  33. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Whelan, M. (1989). Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 249–264.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of MichiganUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations