Skip to main content
Log in

Development of the Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes the construction of the Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory (CFNI), which was designed to assess women’s conformity to an array of feminine norms found in the dominant culture in the United States. In addition, we present four studies in which the psychometric properties of the CFNI were examined. In Study 1, factor analysis indicated that the CFNI is comprised of eight distinct factors labeled as Nice in Relationships, Thinness, Modesty, Domestic, Care for Children, Romantic Relationship, Sexual Fidelity, and Invest in Appearance. Results from Study 2 indicated that the CFNI has strong internal consistency estimates and differentiates college women from college men. In addition, Study 2 demonstrated that the CFNI Total score and subscale scores relate to Bem Sex Role Inventory and Feminist Identity Development Scale scores in theoretically consistent patterns. Study 3 indicated that the CFNI Total score and several of the subscales significantly and positively relate to scores on the Eating Disorder Inventory. Finally, Study 4 demonstrated that the CFNI Total score and subscale scores have high test-retest estimates for a 2–3 week period. The discussion focuses on potential uses of the CFNI, limitations to the study, and suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bargad, A., & Hyde, J. S. (1991). A study of feminist identity development in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981a). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981b). Bem Sex Role Inventory professional manual. Stanford, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. E. (1995). Gender-related individual differences variables: New concepts, methods, and findings. In D. J. Lubinski, & R. V. Dawis (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 119–143). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-African American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, G. R., & Good, G. E. (Eds.). (2001). The new handbook of psychotherapy and counseling with men: A comprehensive guide to settings, problems, and treatment approaches (Vol. 1 & 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. S. (1986). Gender role analysis: A neglected component of psychological assessment. Psychotherapy, 23, 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. S. (1998). Raising their voices: The politics of girls’ anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, L. M. (2002). Gender and the meaning and experience of virginity loss in the contemporary United States. Gender and Society, 16, 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1999). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzy (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Unger, R. (2000). Women and gender: A feminist psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, J. H., Lilly, R. S., Crawford, P. A., & Shepherd, K. L. (1992). The stability of the Eating Disorder Inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 12, 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). The structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelatioships among components and gender labels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarest, J., & Langer, E. (1996). Perception of body shape by underweight, average, and overweight men and women. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 569–570.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M., & Saxon, S. E. (1998). Traditional ideologies, nontraditional lives. Sex Roles, 38, 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, N., & Roush, K. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. Counseling Psychologist, 13, 695–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberly, C. C., & Eberly, B. W. (1985). A review of the Eating Disorder Inventory. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. M. (1995). The relationship between masculine gender role stress and men’s health risk: The validation of the construct. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 207–225). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A. (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development: Studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What’s so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 173–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, D. M. (1991). Eating Disorder Inventory –2 manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, D. M., Olmsted, M. P., & Polivy, J. (1983). Development and validation of a multidimensional Eating Disorder Inventory for anorexia and bulimia. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A., & Scher, M. (1999). Gender and sex in counseling and psychotherapy. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, B. L., & Eisler, R. M. (1992). Development of the Feminine Gender Role Stress Scale: A cognitive-behavioral measure of stress, appraisal, and coping for women. Behavior Modification, 16, 426–438.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, R. (2003). Childfree and feminine: Understanding the gender identity of voluntarily childless women. Gender and Society, 17, 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, G. E., Gilbert, L. A., & Scher, M. (1990). Gender aware therapy: A synthesis of feminist therapy and knowledge about gender. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 376–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E. (1976). Mathematical tools for applied multivariate analysis. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, L. C. (1999). “We’re not old!”: Older women’s negotiation of aging and oldness. Journal of Aging Studies, 13, 419–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordon, J. V. (1992). The relational self: A new perspective for understanding women’s development. Contemporary Psychotherapy Review, 7, 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1964). American longitudinal research on psychological development. Child Development, 35, 1–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The gendered society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1966). Moral education in the schools: A developmental view. School Review, 74, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazur, R. F., & Majors, R. (1995). Men of color: Ethnocultural variations of male gender role strain. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men (pp. 337–358). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locksley, A., & Colten, M. E. (1979). Psychological androgyny: A case of mistaken identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1017–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, K. G., Charanasomboon, S., Brown, C., Hiltunen, G., Long, K., Reinhalter, K., et al. (2003). Internalization of the thin ideal, weight, and body image concerns. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R. (1999a). Interpersonal psychotherapy with men who experience gender role conflict. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R. (1999b). Incorporating a gender role strain perspective in assessing and treating men’s cognitive distortions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B., Ludlow, L., Diemer, M., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matschiner, M., & Murnen, S. K. (1999). Hyperfeminity and influence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 631–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meth, R. (1990). The road to masculinity. In R. Meth & R. Pasick (Eds.), Men in therapy: The challenge of change (pp. 3–34). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, L. B., & Betz, N. E. (1986). Sex differences in the nature, realism, and correlates of body image. Sex Roles, 15, 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002). Feminist identity development measures: Comparing the psychometrics of three instruments. Counseling Psychologist, 30, 66–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, B., Subich, L. M., & Phillips, J. C. (2002). Revisiting feminist identity development theory, research, and practice. Counseling Psychologist, 30, 6–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G. (1985). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities. Journal of Personality, 53, 196–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, F. D. (1985). Review of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. In J. V. Mitchell, Jr. (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 178–179). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1995). Racial differences in women’s desires to be thin International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 191–195.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, K. M. (1989). The relationship of self-monitored dating behavior to level of feminist identity on the Feminist Identity Scale. Sex Roles, 20, 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, G. (1976). Passages: Predictable crises of adult life. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experiemental research in personality (Vol. 13, pp. 1–97). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (1999). SPSS reference guide. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculine ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men (pp. 129–163). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggeman, M., & Pennington, B. (1996). The development of gender differences in body-size dissatisfaction. Australian Psychologist, 25, 306–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L., & Porche, M. V. (2000). The Adolescent Feminine Ideology Scale: Development and validation of a new measure for girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 365–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, M. J. T. (2003). The Counseling Psychologist: 2002 Presidential Address: Extending the ladder of opportunity—breaking through the colored glass ceiling. Counseling Psychologist, 31, 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worell, J., & Todd, J. (1996). Development of the gendered self. In L. Smolak & M. P. Levine (Eds.), The developmental psychopathology of eating disorders: Implications for research, prevention, and treatment (pp. 135–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyche, K. F. (2001). Sociocultural issues in counseling for women of color. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 330–340). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James R. Mahalik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahalik, J.R., Morray, E.B., Coonerty-Femiano, A. et al. Development of the Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory. Sex Roles 52, 417–435 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3709-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3709-7

Keywords

Navigation