Skip to main content
Log in

Parental Preference for Sex of Newborn as Reflected in Positive Affect in Birth Announcements

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Content analysis of birth announcements was used as a method to investigate parental preference for the sex of newborns in Canada. The expression of positive affect (happiness and pride) in birth announcements was examined to determine whether parents express these emotions differently as a function of the sex of newborn. The findings suggest that parents express relatively more pride at the birth of boys than girls, whereas the opposite results were found for happiness. Parents seem unconsciously to categorize boys and girls into two distinct motivational systems: status and attachment, which are related to pride and happiness, respectively. This distinction may influence parents’ perception of their child’s worth and their subsequent investment in their child’s development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, F., & Kuo, E. (1984). The value of daughters and sons: A comparative study of gender preferences of parents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 15(2), 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent–child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browner, C. H. (1986). The politics of reproduction in a Mexican village. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(4), 710–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calgary Herald. (2004). Classifieds—Births archive. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from Web site: http://classiefieds.canada.com/calgary/archives/index.aspx?cls_id=36425

  • Dahl, G., & Moretti, E. (2003, September). The demand for sons: Evidence from divorce, fertility, and shotgun marriage. Retrieved February 23, 2004, from Web site:http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/labor/dahl.pdf

  • Davis, S. (1990). Men as success objects and women as sex objects: A study of personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 23, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolution and social anxiety: The role of attraction, social competition, and social hierarchies. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24, 723–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilory, F., & Steinbacher, R. (1983). Preselection of child’s sex: Technological utilization and feminism. Psychological Reports, 53, 671–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Kring, M. A. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2, 320–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., & Wheeler, L. (1988). Self-presentation in personal advertisements: The influence of implicit notions of attraction and role expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V. (1987). Preferences for sex of children: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 19, 367–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V. (1993). Gender of children and contraceptive use. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 25(2), 213–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance, L. M. (1998). Gender differences in heterosexual dating: A content analysis of personal ads. Journal of Men’s Studies, 6(3), 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt, D. (2003, October 26). It’s a girl! (Will the economy survive?). New York Times, p. C1.

  • Malhi, P. (1995). Influence of gender preference for children on fertility behavior: A comparative study of men and women in Haryana. Journal of Family Welfare, 41, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, G., & Nam, C. (1971). Sex predetermination: Its impact on fertility. Social Biology, 18, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, J., DeWit, J. D., & Ebanks, E. G. (1999). Parental preferences for sex of children in Canada. Sex Roles, 41, 615–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pebley, A., & Westoff, W. (1982). Women’s sex preferences in the United States: 1970–1975. Demography, 19(2), 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharis, M. E., & Manosevitz, M. (1984). Sexual stereotyping of infants: Implications for social work practice. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 20, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pooler, W. S. (1991). Sex of child preferences among college students. Sex Roles, 25, 569–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. Z., Provenzano, F. J., & Luria, Z. (1974). The eye of the beholder: Parents’ view on sex of newborns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44, 512–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, M. (1987). Are sons and daughters treated more differently by fathers than by mothers? Developmental Review, 7, 183–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statting, H., & Klackenberg-Larsson, I. (1991). The short-and-long-term implications for parent–child relations of parents’ prenatal preferences for their child’s gender. Developmental Psychology, 27, 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Gazette. (2004). Classifieds—Births archive. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from Web site: http://classiefieds.canada.com/montreal/archives/index.aspx?cls_id=34480

  • Williamson, N. (1976). Sons or daughters: A cross-cultural survey of parental preferences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Koestner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzalez, A.Q., Koestner, R. Parental Preference for Sex of Newborn as Reflected in Positive Affect in Birth Announcements. Sex Roles 52, 407–411 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-2683-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-2683-4

Keywords

Navigation