Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 5–6, pp 407–411 | Cite as

Parental Preference for Sex of Newborn as Reflected in Positive Affect in Birth Announcements

  • Alexei Quintero Gonzalez
  • Richard KoestnerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Content analysis of birth announcements was used as a method to investigate parental preference for the sex of newborns in Canada. The expression of positive affect (happiness and pride) in birth announcements was examined to determine whether parents express these emotions differently as a function of the sex of newborn. The findings suggest that parents express relatively more pride at the birth of boys than girls, whereas the opposite results were found for happiness. Parents seem unconsciously to categorize boys and girls into two distinct motivational systems: status and attachment, which are related to pride and happiness, respectively. This distinction may influence parents’ perception of their child’s worth and their subsequent investment in their child’s development.

Keywords

parental preference sex of newborn pride birth announcements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, F., & Kuo, E. (1984). The value of daughters and sons: A comparative study of gender preferences of parents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 15(2), 299–318.Google Scholar
  2. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent–child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Browner, C. H. (1986). The politics of reproduction in a Mexican village. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(4), 710–724.Google Scholar
  4. Calgary Herald. (2004). Classifieds—Births archive. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from Web site: http://classiefieds.canada.com/calgary/archives/index.aspx?cls_id=36425
  5. Dahl, G., & Moretti, E. (2003, September). The demand for sons: Evidence from divorce, fertility, and shotgun marriage. Retrieved February 23, 2004, from Web site:http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/labor/dahl.pdf
  6. Davis, S. (1990). Men as success objects and women as sex objects: A study of personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 23, 43–50.Google Scholar
  7. Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolution and social anxiety: The role of attraction, social competition, and social hierarchies. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24, 723–751.Google Scholar
  8. Gilory, F., & Steinbacher, R. (1983). Preselection of child’s sex: Technological utilization and feminism. Psychological Reports, 53, 671–676.Google Scholar
  9. Keltner, D., & Kring, M. A. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2, 320–342.Google Scholar
  10. Koestner, R., & Wheeler, L. (1988). Self-presentation in personal advertisements: The influence of implicit notions of attraction and role expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 149–160.Google Scholar
  11. Krishnan, V. (1987). Preferences for sex of children: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 19, 367–376.Google Scholar
  12. Krishnan, V. (1993). Gender of children and contraceptive use. Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 25(2), 213–221.Google Scholar
  13. Lance, L. M. (1998). Gender differences in heterosexual dating: A content analysis of personal ads. Journal of Men’s Studies, 6(3), 297–308.Google Scholar
  14. Leonhardt, D. (2003, October 26). It’s a girl! (Will the economy survive?). New York Times, p. C1.Google Scholar
  15. Malhi, P. (1995). Influence of gender preference for children on fertility behavior: A comparative study of men and women in Haryana. Journal of Family Welfare, 41, 53–60.Google Scholar
  16. Markle, G., & Nam, C. (1971). Sex predetermination: Its impact on fertility. Social Biology, 18, 73–82.Google Scholar
  17. McDougall, J., DeWit, J. D., & Ebanks, E. G. (1999). Parental preferences for sex of children in Canada. Sex Roles, 41, 615–626.Google Scholar
  18. Pebley, A., & Westoff, W. (1982). Women’s sex preferences in the United States: 1970–1975. Demography, 19(2), 177–189.Google Scholar
  19. Pharis, M. E., & Manosevitz, M. (1984). Sexual stereotyping of infants: Implications for social work practice. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 20, 7–12.Google Scholar
  20. Pooler, W. S. (1991). Sex of child preferences among college students. Sex Roles, 25, 569–576.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Rubin, J. Z., Provenzano, F. J., & Luria, Z. (1974). The eye of the beholder: Parents’ view on sex of newborns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44, 512–519.Google Scholar
  23. Siegal, M. (1987). Are sons and daughters treated more differently by fathers than by mothers? Developmental Review, 7, 183–209.Google Scholar
  24. Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Statting, H., & Klackenberg-Larsson, I. (1991). The short-and-long-term implications for parent–child relations of parents’ prenatal preferences for their child’s gender. Developmental Psychology, 27, 141–147.Google Scholar
  26. The Gazette. (2004). Classifieds—Births archive. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from Web site: http://classiefieds.canada.com/montreal/archives/index.aspx?cls_id=34480
  27. Williamson, N. (1976). Sons or daughters: A cross-cultural survey of parental preferences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations