Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 5–6, pp 311–324 | Cite as

Are Traditional Gender Role Attitudes Associated With Risky Sexual Behavior and Condom-related Beliefs?

  • Cindy L. ShearerEmail author
  • Shelley J. Hosterman
  • Meghan M. Gillen
  • Eva S. Lefkowitz
Article

Abstract

Traditional gender role attitudes, which emphasize an unequal distribution of power in the family and stereotypical norms about masculinity, may be associated with unsafe sexual behavior and beliefs in young men and women. This study was designed to examine associations between gender role attitudes including gender-based family role attitudes and masculinity ideology, sexual behaviors, and condom-related beliefs in a sample of sexually active college students (N = 154). Family role attitudes were related to risky condom-related beliefs but not to risky sexual behavior. Masculinity ideology was related to both sexual behaviors and condom-related beliefs but, in some cases, in a direction opposite to that predicted. These unexpected findings and the utility of examining masculinity ideology among women are discussed.

Keywords

gender role sexual risk condoms college students 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, B. L., & Cyranowki, J. M. (1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1079–1100.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, B. L., Cyranowski, J. M., & Espindle, D. (1999). Men’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 645–661.Google Scholar
  3. Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447.Google Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 339–373.Google Scholar
  5. Baele, J., Dusseldorp, E., & Maes, S. (2001). Condom use self-efficacy: Effect on intended and actual condom use in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 28, 421–431.Google Scholar
  6. Basen-Engquist, K., Masse, L., Coyle, K., Parcel, G. S., Banspach, S., Kirby, D., & Nordora, J. (1999). Validity of scales measuring the psychosocial determinants of HIV/STD-related risk behavior in adolescents. Health Education Research, 14, 25–37.Google Scholar
  7. Beckman, L. J., Harvey, S. M., & Tiersky, L. A. (1996). Attitudes about condoms and condom use among college students. Journal of American College Health, 44, 243–250.Google Scholar
  8. Boone, T. L., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2004). Safer sex and the health belief model: Considering the contributions of peer norms and socialization factors. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 16, 51–68.Google Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
  10. Cerwonka, E. R., Isbell, T. R., & Hansen, C. E. (2000). Psychosocial factors as predictors of unsafe sexual practices among young adults. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 121–153.Google Scholar
  11. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, M. L., Peirce, R. S., Huselid, R. F. (1994). Substance use and sexual risk taking among Black adolescents and White adolescents. Health Psychology, 13, 251–262.Google Scholar
  13. Ehrhardt, A. A., & Wasserheit, J. N. (1991). Age, gender, and sexual risk behaviors for sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. In J. N. Wasserheit, S. O. Aral, K. K. Holmes, & P. J. Hitchcock (Eds.), Research issues in human behavior and sexually transmitted diseases in the AIDS Era (pp. 97–121). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.Google Scholar
  14. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Gomez, C. A., & Marin, B. V. (1996). Gender, culture, and power: Barriers to HIV-prevention strategies for women. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 355–362.Google Scholar
  16. Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1995). Gender differences and similarities in sex and love. Personal Relationships, 2, 55–65.Google Scholar
  17. Hoffman, L. W., & Kloska, D. D. (1995). Parents’ gender-based attitudes toward marital roles and child rearing: Development and validation of new measures. Sex Roles, 32, 372–295.Google Scholar
  18. Hynie, M., Lydon, J. E., Cote, S., Wiener, S. (1998). Relational sexual scripts and women’s condom use: The importance of internalized norms. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 370–380.Google Scholar
  19. Jemmott, L. S., & Jemmott, J. B. (1992). Increasing condom use intentions among sexually active Black adolescent women. Nursing Research, 41, 273–279.Google Scholar
  20. Kalof, L. (1995). Sex, power, and dependency: The politics of adolescent sexuality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 229–249.Google Scholar
  21. Ku, L., Sonenstein, F. L., & Pleck, J. H. (1993). Young men’s risk behaviors for HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases, 1988 through 1991. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1609–1615.Google Scholar
  22. Leigh, B. C., Morrison, D. M., Trocki, K., & Temple, M. T. (1994). Sexual behavior of American adolescents: Results from a U.S. national survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 15, 117–125.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, J. E., Malow, R. M., & Ireland, S. J. (1997). HIV/AIDS in heterosexual college students: A decade of literature. Journal of American College Health, 45, 147–158.Google Scholar
  24. Mahoney, C. A., Thombs, D. L., & Ford, O. J. (1995). Health belief and self-efficacy models: Their utility in explaining college student condom use. AIDS Education and Prevention, 7, 32–49.Google Scholar
  25. Maibach, E., & Murphy, D. A. (1995). Self-efficacy and health promotion research and practice: Conceptualization and measurement. Health Education Research, 10, 37–50.Google Scholar
  26. Maybach, K. L., & Gold, S. R. (1994). Hyperfemininity and attraction to macho and non-macho men. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 91–98.Google Scholar
  27. McCormack, A. S., Anderton, J., & Barbieri, T. (1993). Gender, HIV awareness, and prevention among college students. College Student Journal, 27, 514–522.Google Scholar
  28. McCreary, D. R., Newcomb, M. D., & Sadava, S. W. (1998). Dimensions of the male gender role: A confirmatory analysis in men and women. Sex Roles, 39, 81–95.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, J. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163.Google Scholar
  31. Murnen, S., & Byrne, D. (1991). Hyperfemininity: Measurement and initial validation of the construct. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 85–106.Google Scholar
  32. National Center for Health Statistics. (2000). Health, United States, 2000 with adolescent health chartbook (DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 2000-1232-1). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  33. Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Bimbi, D., & Borkowski, T. (2000). Perceptions of the benefits and costs associated with condom use and unprotected sex among late adolescent college students. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 377–391.Google Scholar
  34. Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 11–29.Google Scholar
  35. Pulerwitz, J., Amaro, H., DeJong, W., Gortmaker, S., & Rudd, R. (2002). Relationship power, condom use, and HIV risk among women in the USA. AIDS Care, 14, 789–800.Google Scholar
  36. Rapaport, K., & Burkhart, B. R. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216–221.Google Scholar
  37. Serovich, J. M., & Greene, K. (1997). Predictors of adolescent sexual risk taking behaviors which put them at risk for contracting HIV. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 429–444.Google Scholar
  38. Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculinity ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 117–135.Google Scholar
  39. Soet, J. E., Dudley, W. N., & DiIorio, C. (1999). The effects of ethnicity and perceived power on women’s sexual behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 707–723.Google Scholar
  40. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66–67.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.Google Scholar
  42. Wingood, G. W., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 539–565.Google Scholar
  43. Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1992). Toward a feminist understanding of women and power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 381–388.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cindy L. Shearer
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Shelley J. Hosterman
    • 2
  • Meghan M. Gillen
    • 1
  • Eva S. Lefkowitz
    • 1
  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park
  2. 2.Lehigh UniversityBethlehem
  3. 3.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesPenn State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations