Abstract
Girls’ tend to have less peer support for their science interests than do boys, which may contribute to gender differences in science motivation. The effect of science peer relationships on adolescents’ visions of their possible personal future lives as scientists was studied in 161 female and 163 male gifted high school students who participated in summer science enrichment programs. Student reports of having positive science peer relationships were associated with more positive expectations of the possible personal self as scientist prior to the programs, and both program-related and nonprogram-related science peer relationships were associated with changes in the possible self at posttesting and at 6 month follow-up. These relations held for both male and female students. At follow-up, girls reported a stronger social niche with fellow program participants and stronger science peer relationships than did boys. Implications of the findings are discussed within the larger gendered societal context for science achievement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Institutes for Research. (1998). Gender gaps. When schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 3–27.
Bazler, J. A., Spokane, A. R., Ballard, R., & Fugate, M. S. (1993). The Jason Project experience and attitudes toward science as an enterprise and career. Journal of Career Development, 20, 101–112.
Brown, B. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243–257.
Collins, A. (1997). National science education standards: Looking backward and forward. Elementary School Journal, 97, 299–313.
Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1994). Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 423–438.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.
Erb, T. O., & Smith, W. (1984). Validation of the Attitude Toward Women in Science Scale for early adolescents. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 391–397.
Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1999). Intentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differences. Science and Education, 83, 55–75.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115.
Gallagher, J. J. (1993). An intersection of public policy and social science: Gifted students and education in mathematics and science. In L. A. Penner, G. M. Batsche, H. M. Knoff, & D. L. Nelson (Eds.), The challenge in mathematics and science education: Psychology’s response (pp. 15–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Goodenow, C., & Grady, K. E. (1993). The relationship of school belonging and friends’ values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 60–71.
Greenfield, T. A. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 901–933.
Guzzetti, B. J., & Williams, W. O. (1996). Gender, text, and discussion: Examining intellectual safety in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 5–20.
Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 681–704.
Jovanovic, J., & King, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who’s doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35, 477–496.
Kahle, J. B., & Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 131–140.
Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 542–557). New York: Macmillan.
Kahle, J. B., Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J., & Riley, D. (1993). Gender differences in science education: Building a model. Educational Psychologist, 28, 379–404.
Kelly, A. (1988). Option choice for girls and boys. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6, 5–23.
Lee, V. E., Marks, H. M., & Byrd, T. (1994). Sexism in single-sex and coeducational independent secondary school classrooms. Sociology of Education, 67, 92–120.
Linn, M. C., Lewis, C., Tsuchida, I., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Beyond fourth-grade science: Why do U.S. and Japanese students diverge? Educational Research, 29, 4–14.
Lips, H. M. (1992). Gender- and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students’ academic choices. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 62–81.
Lips, H. M. (1995). Through the lens of mathematical/scientific self-schemas: Images of students’ current and possible selves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1671–1699.
Lips, H. M. (2000). College students’ visions of power and possibility as moderated by gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 39–43.
Manis, J. D., Thomas, N. G., Sloat, B. F., & Davis, C. G. (1989). An analysis of factors affecting choice of majors in science, mathematics, and engineering at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Center for Education of Women Research Reports.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2001). Digest of Educational Statistics, 2000. Chapter 3. Postsecondary Education, 2000. Retrieved June 27, 2002, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/ pubs 2001/digest/dt257.html
Phillips, K. A., Barrow, L. H., & Chandrasekhar, M. (2002). Science career interests among high school girls one year after participation in a summer science program. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 235–247.
Potter, E. F., & Rosser, S. V. (1992). Factors in life science: Textbooks that may deter girls’ interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 669–686.
Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101–111.
Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1–18.
Simpson, R. D., & Troost, K. M. (1982). Influences on commitment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education, 66, 763–781.
Stake, J. E. (2003). Understanding male bias against girls and women in science. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1–17.
Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1065–1088.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
Talton, E. L., & Simpson, R. D. (1985). Relationships between peer and individual attitudes toward science among adolescent students. Science Education, 69, 19–24.
Terry, J. M., & Baird, W. E. (1997). What factors affect attitudes toward women in science held by high school biology students? School Science and Mathematics, 97, 78–86.
Updegraff, K. A., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1996). Gender roles in marriage: What do they mean for girls’ and boys’ school achievement? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 73–88.
Ware, N. C., & Lee, V. E. (1988). Sex differences in choice of college science majors. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 593–614.
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stake, J.E., Nickens, S.D. Adolescent Girls’ and Boys’ Science Peer Relationships and Perceptions of the Possible Self as Scientist. Sex Roles 52, 1–11 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1189-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1189-4