Sex Roles

, Volume 51, Issue 9–10, pp 511–521 | Cite as

Why the Academic Pipeline Leaks: Fewer Men than Women Perceive Barriers to Becoming Professors

  • Sari M. van Anders


Women are underrepresented in the professoriate compared to men; this study was designed to examine whether systemic barriers associated with parenting discourage women from pursuing academic careers. Data from 468 female and male graduate students were collected through an online questionnaire. More men than women intend to pursue academic careers. Parenting and mobility issues—but not research or teaching issues—were more negatively associated with entering the professoriate for women than for men. However, women were not more interested in having children than men were. Results support the hypothesis that women self-select away from academia in response to perceived systemic barriers related to parenthood. To ensure quality and equity in academia, universities should enact policy that addresses the realities of childbearing and childrearing women.

gender higher education graduate study family academia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aisenberg, N., & Harrington, M. (1988). Women of academe: Outsiders in the sacred grove. {plAmherst: The University of Massachusetts Press}.Google Scholar
  2. American Association of University Professors [AAUP]. (2001). Statement of principles on family responsibilities and academic work. Retrieved January 5, 2004, from http:// Scholar
  3. Armenti, C. (2004). May babies and posttenure babies: Maternal decisions of women professors. Review of Higher Education, 27, 211–231.Google Scholar
  4. Biernat, M., & Wortman, C. B. (1991). Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 844–860.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackwell, D. L., & Lichter, D. T. (2000). Mate selection among married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 275–302.Google Scholar
  6. Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.Google Scholar
  7. Canadian Association of University Teachers [CAUT]. (2002). Ivory towers: Feminist audits. Year 2002 figures. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from women/Audit2002.aspGoogle Scholar
  8. Canadian Association of University Teachers [CAUT]. (2003). CAUT almanac of post-secondary education in Canada.Retrieved October 10, 2003, from Scholar
  9. Caplan, P. J. (1993). Lifting a ton of feathers: A woman's guide to surviving in the academic world.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, L. H., Chrisler, J. C., & Quina, K. (Eds.). (1998). Arming Athena: Career strategies for women in academe.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Committee on Women Faculty, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1999). A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Retrieved January 6, 2004, from http:// Scholar
  12. Cook, S. G. (2001). Students give failing grade to PhD programs. Women in Higher Education Newsletter, 10, 27–28. Retrieved December vn10, 2003, from http://hau wihe%20article.htmGoogle Scholar
  13. Equal Rights Advocates. (2003). Creating gender equity in academia. Retrieved December 25, 2003, from http:// gender equity academia.pdfGoogle Scholar
  14. European Technology Assessment Network [ETAN]. (2002). Science policies in the European Union: Promoting excellence through mainstreaming gender equality. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from Scholar
  15. Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education ( Philadelphia: Pew Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, P. A. (1970, September 25). Women in Academe. Science, 169, 1284–1290.Google Scholar
  17. Irvine, A. D. (1996). Jack and Jill and employment equity. Dialogue, XXXV, 255–291.Google Scholar
  18. Kimura, D. (1997). Affirmative action policies are demeaning to women in academia. Canadian Psychology, 38, 238–243.Google Scholar
  19. Kimura, D. (1999, November 4). Best person not always hired under affirmative action [Opinion]. Simon Fraser News, 16. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://www. mediapr/ sfnews/1999/nov4/kimura.htmlGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimura, D. (2002, January 10). Researcher thanks preferential hiring survey participants [Letter to the editor].UBC Reports, 48. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from 10let.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. Kite, M. E., Russo, N. F., Brehm, S. S., Fouad, N. A., Hall, C. C. I., Hyde, J. S., et al. (2001). Women psychologists in academe: Mixed progress, unwarranted complacency. American Psychologist, 56, 1080–1098.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mason, M., & Goulden, M. (2002). Do babies matter? The effect of family formation on the lifelong careers of academic men and women. Academe, 88, 21–27.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, J., & Chamberlin, M. (2000). Women are teachers, men are professors: A study of student perceptions. Teaching Sociol-ogy, 28, 283–299.Google Scholar
  25. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2002). Table 171, Chapter 3: Post-secondary education. In Digest of education statistics. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from =2002130.Google Scholar
  26. O'Reilly, A. (Ed.). (2003). Mothering in the academy. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 5(2).Google Scholar
  27. Pittman, J. F., Teng, W., Kerpelman, J. L., & Solheim, C. A. (1999). Satisfaction with performance of housework: The roles of time spent, quality assessment, and stress. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 746–770.Google Scholar
  28. Roth, S. (2003). Report of the steering committee for the women's initiative at Duke University. Retrieved December 25, 2003, from initiative/report report.htmsGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruble, D. N., Fleming, A. S., Hackel, L. S., & Stangor, C. (1988). Changes in the marital relationship during the transition to first time motherhood: Effects of violated assumptions concerning division of household labour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 78–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Simeone, A. (1987). Academic women: Working towards equality. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  31. Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roless, 41, 509–528.Google Scholar
  32. The Chilly Collective (Eds.). (1995). Breaking anonymity: The chilly climate for women faculty. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2004). Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 27, 233–257.Google Scholar
  35. Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 557–594.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, R. (1999, June 25). Timing is everything: Academe's annual baby boom. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45, A14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sari M. van Anders
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Western Ontario (UWO), LondonCanada

Personalised recommendations