Abstract
Legislative writing, which is one of the key genres in the practice of law, has mostly been overlooked in pedagogic applications in English for Legal Communication (ELC), even though more than any other professional writing, it demonstrates very typical and distinctive use of linguistic and other semiotic resources, including some of the specific rhetorical conventions and constraints. However, it is surprising that despite its distinctive prominence in legal practice, it has never figured in English for Legal Communication programmes. It seems to be the result of pedagogic convenience rather than curriculum need. In this paper, I would like to argue for the inclusion of legislative genres in English for Legal Communication curriculum design as input to teaching materials, to make it easier for learners to understand and interpret other forms of legal communication, such as cases, judgements, contracts, agreements, and even courtroom interaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although there may be technical differences between Legislative and Statutory provisions, I will be using them interchangeably to mean rules and regulations as a product of legislative process, i.e., passed by a legislative body.
References
Bhatia, Vijay K. (2005). ‘Specificity and Generality in Legislative Expression: Two Sides of the Coin’ in Bhatia, Vijay K., Engberg, Jan, Gotti, Maurizio and Heller, Dorothee (edited) Vagueness in Normative Texts, Bern: Peter Lang.
Candlin, C.N., Vijay K. Bhatia, and C. Jensen. 2002. Must the Worlds Collide? Professional and Academic Discourses in the Study and Practice of Law. In (2002): Domain-specific English: Textual Practices Across Communities and Classrooms, ed. G. Cortese and P. Riley, 101–114. Bern: Peter Lang.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2017. Critical Genre Analysis: Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. London: Routledge.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2008. Genre Analysis, ESP and Professional Practice. English for Specific Purposes 27: 161–740.
Bhatia, V.K. 2010. Interdiscursivity in Professional Communication. Discourse and Communication 21 (1): 32–50.
Candlin, C. N., and Y. Maley. 1997. Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in the Discourses of Alternative Dispute Resolution’. In B.-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell and B. Nordberg (Eds), The Construction of Professional Discourse. London. Longman. (201–22).
Bhatia, V.K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Lowe, David, and Charlie Potter. Understanding legislation: A practical guide to statutory interpretation. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509995554.0008
Rappaport, Bret. 2013. A lawyer’s hidden persuader: genre bias and how it shapes legal texts by constraining writers’ choices and influencing reader’s perception’s. Journal of Law and Policy. 22 (1): 101–169.
Bhatia, Vijay K. (1982): An Investigation into Formal and Functional Characteristics of Qualifications in Legislative Writing and its Application to English for Academic Legal Purposes, Ph.D. thesis, University of Aston in Birmingham.
Renton, D. 1975. The preparation of legislation, Report on the committee appointed by The Lord President of the Council, HMSO, London.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.
Caldwell, Edward. 1982. Specialist informant interviews, reported in Bhatia
Bhatia, V.K. 1987. ‘Textual-mapping in British legislative writing. World Englishes 6: 1.
Crystal, David, and Derek Davy. 1969. Investigating English Style. London: Longman.
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bhatia, V.K. 1983. Simplification vs. Easification: the case of legal texts. Applied Linguistics 4 (1): 42–54.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2014. Linguistic and socio-pragmatic considerations in legislative drafting. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 2 (2): 169–183. https://doi.org/10.5235/2050-8840.2.2.169.
Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury. 2011. General, equal and certain: law reform today and tomorrow, Statute Law Society, Lord Renton Lecture. London. 28 November. http://www.statutelawsociety.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/RentonLectureNov2011Final.pdf
Renton, D. 1990. Current drafting practices and problems in the United kingdom. Statute Law Review 11 (1): 11–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhatia, V.K. Designing English for Legal Communication Programmes: Exploiting Legislative Genres. Int J Semiot Law 36, 1883–1896 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09968-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09968-5