Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

To Eat or Not to Eat? A Short Path from Vegetarianism to Cannibalism

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subjective reasoning and chemical composition are not the sole arbiters of our systems of alimentary taste; consumption of food is also defined by cultural orientation and other complex value systems. There are those who choose to consume only plant matter to respect the rights of animals, equally there are those who consume pets without a second thought. What informs these choices depends on how we understand our own place in the world, the values we attribute to the things that surrounds us, the relationships we maintain with our fellow beings and those with living things in general. It is in the space between those variable definitions that we find food taboos and the complex stories which entwine around them. Above all else comes cannibalism, present today not only as a hypothetical act in which only the wildest savages could take part but also as the basis of varying forms of current communication. Cannibalism is at work in advertising and in television programs, in modern rituals and in unconventional marketing campaigns. In this paper we will attempt to explain its meaning in connection with the more general way of how to catalogue and understand the consumption of food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. This is a suggestion from Paolo Fabbri (personal communication).

  2. Reference: Wikipedia (Italian page), my translation.

  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYdZPwJfvxI.

  4. For a discussion of Calvino's work from the point of view of taste aesthetics, cf. Perullo [22].

  5. If the bodies shown in the images appear ugly, however, it is only to show the reader the adverse consequences of a carnivorous diet (obesity, impotence, etc.) through a strategy of manipulation based on threat [9].

  6. In the first episode of the first season, Dexter abandons a half eaten sandwich in his car and signifies his next murder by saying "I’m hungry for something different now”.

References

  1. Arens, William. 1979. The Man-Eating Myth. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Augé, Marc. 1977. Cannibalismo. In AA.VV., Enciclopedia, vol. II, 535-547. Torino: Einaudi.

  3. Bachtin, Michail. 1965. Tvorcestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaja kul’tura srednevekov’ja i Renessansa. Mosjva: Chudožestvennaja literatura.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calvino, Italo. 1995. Sotto il sole giaguaro. Milano: Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Descola, Philippe. 2005. Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fabbri, Paolo. 2017. L’efficacia semiotica. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Floch, Jean-Marie. 1990. Sémiotique, marketing et communication. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giannitrapani, Alice. 2017. Dal cane-cibo al dog restaurant: giochi aspettuali nella dialettica alimentare uomo/animale. Lexia 27–28: 374–390.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1983. Du sens II. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greimas, Algirdas Julien, and Joseph Courtés. 1979. Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage, vol. I. Paris: Hachette.

  11. Harris, Marvin. 1977. Cannibals and Kings. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jullien, François. 2015. De l’être au vivre. Lexique euro-chinois de la pensée. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leach, Edmund Roland. 1964. Anthropological Aspects of Language: Animal Categories and Verbal Abuse. In New Directions in the Study of Language, ed. Eric Heinz Lenneberg, 23-63. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

  14. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1962. La Pensée Sauvage. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lévi-Staruss, Claude. 1984. Paroles Données. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lévi-Staruss, Claude. 2013. Nous sommes tous des cannibales. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lotman, Jurij Michajlovič. 2006. Il decabrista nella vita. Il comportamento quotidiano come categoria storico-psicologica. In Id., Tipologia della cultura. Roma: Meltemi.

  18. Mannucci, Erica Joy. 2008. La cena di Pitagora. Storia del vegetarianismo dall’antica Grecia a Internet. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marrone, Gianfranco. 2016. Semiotica del gusto. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marrone, Gianfranco (ed.). 2017. Zoosemiotica 2.0. Forme e politiche dell’animalità. Palermo: Edizioni Mueso Pasqualino.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marrone, Gianfranco, and Dario Mangano (eds.). 2018. Semiotics of Animals in Culture. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perullo, Nicola. 2006. Per un’estetica del cibo. Palermo: Aesthetica.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rastier, François. 2001. L’action et le sens pour une sémiotique des cultures. Journal des anthropologues, n. 85–86: 183–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ricci, Piero. 2012. L’eccedenza del significante e la confusione tra parole e bocconi. In La cucina del senso, ed. Gianfranco Marrone and Alice Giannitrapani, 133–142. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Safran Foer, Jonathan. 2009. Eating Animals. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sahlins, Marshall. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Soler, Jean. 1997. Le ragioni della Bibbia: le norme alimentari ebraiche. In Storia dell’alimentazione, ed. Jean-Louis Flandrin and Massimo Montanari, 46–55. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singer, Peter. 1975. Animal Liberation. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ventura, Ilaria. 2017. Il packaging degli alimenti veg. In Zoosemiotica 2.0. Forme e politiche dell’animalità, ed. G. Marrone, 437–449. Palermo: Edizioni Mueso Pasqualino.

  30. Viveiros De Castro, Eduardo. 2009. Métaphysiques cannibales. Paris: PUF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento Culture e Società, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze ed. 15, 90128, Palermo, Italy

    Alice Giannitrapani

Authors
  1. Alice Giannitrapani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Giannitrapani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giannitrapani, A. To Eat or Not to Eat? A Short Path from Vegetarianism to Cannibalism. Int J Semiot Law 31, 531–560 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9570-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9570-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation