Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The concept of Conciliation Ethics in the Qurʾan is a crucial aspect of Islamic Law: Conciliation features notably in the Qurʾanic text which gives rise to Islamic rules and regulations, Conciliation is an important dispute resolution method in an Islamic legal system, and Conciliation-related Qurʾanic textual analysis reveals a broad range of legal language and concepts. Traditional studies of Conciliation in the Qurʾan have often focussed on the process of ṣulḥ (Reconciliation) through intermediaries, particularly in marriage and between groups of Muslims, whilst there is a dearth of Western scholarship in this area. Using Classical Arabic tafsīr (exegesis) and Western literature on Conciliation as a general concept, this paper examines holistically and analytically the concept of Conciliation Ethics in the Qurʾan, investigating its scope, constituent elements, emphasis and purpose. This paper argues, based on a manual survey of the entire Qurʾan, that Conciliation is not limited to isolated contexts or verses where ṣulḥ is mentioned explicitly. The paper finds that Conciliation is a pervasive concept throughout the hierarchy of social relationships. It is achieved through behaviours such as good conduct (iḥsān), attitudes such as ‘Differentiation’ and ‘Externalisation’ and preventative strategies of dispute avoidance, and sometimes includes a contract or Reconciliation process. It is emphasised in the Qurʾan through a range of stylistic features and is of fundamental importance in maintaining the fabric of society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Rāzī, 1981. Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Qurṭubī, 2006. Al-Jāmiʿ li-aḥkām il-Qurʾan. Beirut: Al-Resalah.

  3. Bewley, A. 2003. Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī, Vol. 1. London: Dar al-Taqwa.

  4. Al-Baydāwī, 2012. Tafsīr al-Baydāwī. Beirut: Dar Ehya Al-Tourath Al-Arabi.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abdel Haleem, M. 2005. The Qurʾan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yusuf Ali, M. 2001. The meaning of the holy Qurʾan. Maryland: Amana Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pickthall, M. 2005. The meaning of the glorious Qurʾan. Birmingham: IDCI.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Baʿalbakī, R. 2000. Al-Mawrid. Beirut: Dar-El-Elm Lilmalayin.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muṣtafā, A. 2007. Al-Ṣulḥ fī al-lugha wa al-Qurʾan wa al-Sunna wa aqwāl al-ʿulamāʾ fī dhālik. http://www.tafsir.net. Accessed 22 July 2015.

  10. ʿAbd al-Bāqī, M. 2001. Al-Muʿjam al-mufahras li-alfāẓ al-Qurʾan al-karīm. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth.

  11. Lawson, T. 2008. Duality, opposition and typology in the Qurʾan: The apocalyptic substrate. Journal of Qurʾanic Studies 10(2): 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ʿAbd al-Quddūs, M. 1999. Al-Ṣulḥ wal-iṣlāḥ fil-Qurʾan al-karīm, Vol. 1. Mecca: Jāmiʿat Umm ul-Qurā. http://www.al-eman.com. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.

  13. Ḥijāzī, S. 1986. Manhaj al-iʿlām al-islāmī fī ṣulḥ al-Ḥudaybia. Jeddah: Dār al-Manāra.

  14. Bouheraoua, S. 2010. Foundation of mediation in Islamic law and its contemporary application. International Islamic University Malaysia. http://www.asiapacificmediationforum.org. Accessed 22 July 2015.

  15. Hassan, K. 2006. Employment dispute resolution mechanism from the Islamic perspective. Arab Law Quarterly 20(2): 181–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koopmans, S. 2008. Diplomatic dispute settlement: The use of inter-state conciliation. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Othman, A. 2007. And amicable settlement is best: Ṣulḥ and dispute resolution in Islamic Law. Arab Law Quarterly 21(1): 64–90.

  18. Ṭāhā, Ṭ. 2009. Al-Ṣulḥ fī ḍawʾ al-Qurʾan al-karīm. Majalla al-Jāmiʿa al-Islāmiyya bil-Madina al-Munawwara. http://www.uqu.edu.sa. Accessed 21 Aug 2015.

  19. Greenhouse, C. 1985. Mediation: A comparative approach. Man 20(1): 90–114.

  20. Nagata, J. 1998. Managing marital disputes in Malaysia: Islamic mediators and conflict resolution in the Sharīʿah courts. The Journal of Asian Studies 57(1): 275–277.

  21. Sajoo, A. 2014. Islam, the Sharīʿa and alternative dispute resolution: Mechanisms for legal redress in the Muslim community by Mohamed M Keshavjee. International Journal 69(2): 264–266.

  22. Abu-Nimer, M. 2003. Nonviolence and peace building in Islam. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

  23. Cohen, R. 2001. Language and conflict resolution: The limits of English. International Studies Review 3(1): 25–51.

  24. Shapiro, D. 2005. Enemies, allies and emotions. In The handbook of dispute resolution, ed. M. Moffitt, and R. Bordone. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  25. Allred, K. 2005. Relationship dynamics in disputes. In The handbook of dispute resolution, ed. M. Moffitt, and R. Bordone. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  26. Raz, J. 1994. Ethics in the public domain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  27. Gilliot, C. 2003. Narratives. In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾan 3: 516–528. Brill Online. http://www.referenceworks.brillonline.com.

  28. Neuwirth, A. 2000. A pre-canonical reading of the Qurʾanic creation accounts (Part II). Journal of Qurʾanic Studies 2(2): 1–18.

  29. Welch, A. 2000. Formulaic features of the punishment stories. In Literary structures of religious meaning in the Qurʾan, ed. I. Boullata. Oxon: Routledge.

  30. Boullata, I. 2000. Sayyid Qutb’s literary appreciation of the Qurʾan. In Literary structures of religious meaning in the Qurʾan, ed. I. Boullata. Oxon: Routledge.

  31. Abdel Haleem, M. 2001. Understanding the Qurʾan: Themes and style. London: IB Tauris.

  32. Mālik, 1985. Muwaṭṭa Mālik. Cairo: Muṣtafā Al-Bābī Al-Ḥalabī.

  33. Wehr, H. 1980. A dictionary of modern written Arabic, ed. J. Cowan. Beirut: Librairie Du Liban.

  34. Mir, M. 2000. Irony in the Qurʾan: A study of the story of Joseph. In Literary structures of religious meaning in the Qurʾan, ed. I. Boullata. Oxon: Routledge.

  35. Zebiri, K. 2007. Argumentation. In The Blackwell companion to the Qurʾan, ed. A. Rippin. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

  36. Gwynne, R. 2004. Logic, rhetoric and legal reasoning in the Qurʾan. New York: Routledge.

  37. McAuliffe, J. 2000. Text and textuality: Q.3:7 as a point of intersection. In Literary structures of religious meaning in the Qurʾan, ed. I. Boullata. Oxon: Routledge.

  38. Hāshmī, A. 2008. Jawāhir al-balāgha. Beirut: Muʾassa Al-Muʿārif.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Eggen, N. 2011. Conceptions of trust in the Qurʾan. Journal of Qurʾanic Studies 13(2): 56–85.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schacht, J. 1959. Origins of Muhammadan jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Azami, M. 2004. On Schacht’s origins of Muhammadan jurisprudence. Lahore: Suhail Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hallaq, W. 2005. The origins and evolution of Islamic law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Harvey, R. 2013. Societal justice in the Qurʾan, Ph.D. Thesis. London: SOAS (unpublished).

  44. Gwynne, R. 2007. Patterns of address. In The Blackwell companion to the Qurʾan, ed. A. Rippin. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Abdel Haleem, M. 2010. Qurʾanic jihād: A linguistic and contextual analysis. Journal of Qurʾanic Studies 12: 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shafi Fazaluddin.

Additional information

The author was employed for 18 years in the City of London’s legal and financial sectors and holds postgraduate degree qualifications in both Law and Islamic Studies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fazaluddin, S. Conciliation Ethics in the Qurʾan. Int J Semiot Law 29, 333–358 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-016-9455-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-016-9455-z

Keywords

Navigation