Reinforcing or Challenging Stigma? The Risks and Benefits of ‘Dignity Talk’ in Sex Work Discourse

  • Stewart CunninghamEmail author


The concept of ‘human dignity’ sits at the heart of international human rights law and a growing number of national constitutions and yet its meaning is heavily contested and contingent. I aim to supplement the theoretical literature on dignity by providing an empirical study of how the concept is used in the specific context of legal discourse on sex work. I will analyse jurisprudence in which commercial sex was declared as incompatible with human dignity, focussing on the South African Constitutional Court case of S v Jordan and the Indian Supreme Court case of Budhadev Karmaskar v State of West Bengal. I will consider how these courts conceptualise dignity and argue that their conclusions on the undignified nature of sex work are predicated on particular sexual norms that privilege emotional and relational intimacy. In light of the stigma faced by sex workers I will explore how a discourse, proclaiming sex work as beneath human dignity, may impact on the way that sex workers are perceived and represented culturally, arguing that it reinforces stigma. I will go on to examine how sex workers subvert the notion that commercial sex is undignified, and resist stigma, by campaigning for the right to sell sex with dignity. I will demonstrate that an alternative legal approach to dignity and sex work is possible, where the two are not considered as inherently incompatible, concluding with thoughts on the risks and benefits of using ‘dignity talk’ in activism and campaigns for sex work law reform.


Sex work Prostitution Human dignity Stigma Laclau and Mouffe Discourse theory 



I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Jane Scoular, for extremely helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.


  1. 1.
    Adler, Libby. 2005. Future of sodomy. Fordham Urban Law Journal 32(2): 197–229.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adler, Libby. 2008. The dignity of sex. The UCLA Women’s Law Journal 17(1): 1–52.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bagaric, Mirko, and James Allan. 2006. The vacuous concept of dignity. Journal of Human Rights 5(2): 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrett, Jonathan. 2005. Dignatio and the human body. South African Journal on Human Rights 21: 525–546.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barroso, Luis Roberto. 2012. Here, there and everywhere: Human dignity in contemporary law and in transnational discourse. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 35: 331–393.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bell, Shannon. 1994. Reading, writing and rewriting the prostitute body. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernstein, Elizabeth. 2007. Temporarily yours: Intimacy, authenticity, and the commerce of sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Betts, Hannah. 2013. We need to face up to hatred of prostitutes—among feminists, too. The Guardian (published online 5 March 2013). Accessed 18 June 2015.
  9. 9.
    Bonthuys, Elsje. 2006. Womens sexuality in the South African constitutional court. Feminist Legal Studies 14: 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brennan, Andrew, and Y.S. Lo. 2007. Two conceptions of dignity: Honour and self-determination. In Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation, ed. Jeff Maplas, and Norelle Lickis. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brents, Barbara G., Crystal A. Jackson, and Kathryn Hausbeck. 2010. The state of sex: Tourism, sex and sin in the new American heartland. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bruckert, Chris. 2012. The mark of disreputable labour, workin’ it: Sex workers negotiate stigma. In Stigma revisited: Implications of the mark, ed. Chris Bruckert, and Stacey Hannem. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bruckert, Chris, and Stacey Hannem. 2013. Rethinking the prostitution debates: Transcending structural stigma in systemic responses to sex work. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 28(1): 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Canick, Hubert. 2002. ‘Dignity of man’ and ‘Persona’ in stoic anthropology: Some remarks on Cicero, De Officiis I. In The concept of human dignity in human rights discourse, ed. David Kretzmer, and Eckart Klein, 105–107. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Case Comment. 2008. Tremblay versus France (Application No.37194/02). European Human Rights Law Review 1: 135–137.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chez Stella. 2008. Sex work: 14 answers to your question. Accessed 18 June 2015.
  17. 17.
    Donnelly, Jack. 2014. Normative versus taxonomic humanity : Varieties of human dignity in the western tradition. Journal of Human Rights 14(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dupré, Catherine. 2012. Dignity, democracy, civilisation. Liverpool Law Review 33: 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dupré, Catherine. 2009. Unlocking human dignity: Towards a theory for the 21st century. European Human Rights Law Review 2: 190–205.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feldman, David. 1999. Human dignity as a legal value, Part 1. Public Law 4: 682–702.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feldman, David. 2000. Human dignity as a legal value, Part 2. Public Law 1: 61–76.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fritz, Nicole. 2004. Crossing Jordan: Constitutional space for (Un)civil sex? South African Journal on Human Rights 20: 230–248.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. St Ives: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hennette-Vauchez, Stéphanie. 2011. A human dignitas? Remnants of the ancient legal concept in contemporary dignity jurisprudence. International Journal of Constitutional Law 9(1): 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hesford, Wendy S. 2004. Documenting violations: Rhetorical witnessing and the spectacle of distant suffering. Biography 27(1): 104–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Howarth, David, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2000. Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In Discourse theory and political analysis: identities, hegemonies and social change, ed. David Howarth, Aletta J. Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kempado, Kamala, and Jo Doezema (eds.). 1998. Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, and redefinition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kempado, Kamala. 1998. The migrant tightrope: Experiences from the Caribbean. In Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, and redefinition, ed. Kamala Kempado, and Jo Doezema. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    White, Emily Kidd. 2012. There is no such as a right to human dignity: a reply to Conor O’Mahony. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10(2): 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewis, Milton. 2007. A brief history of human dignity: Idea and application. In Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation, ed. Jeff Maplas, and Norelle Lickis. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Macklin, Ruth. 2003. Dignity is a useless concept. British Medical Journal 327(7429): 1419–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mattson, David J., and Susan G. Clark. 2011. Human dignity in concept and practice. Policy Sciences 44: 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McCrudden, Christopher. 2008. Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights. European Journal of International Law 19(4): 655–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Henry, Lesley Meltzer. 2011. The jurisprudence of dignity. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160(1): 169–233.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meyerson, Denise. 2004. Does the constitutional court of South Africa take rights seriously? The case of S v Jordan. Acta Juridica 138–154.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Neal, Mary. 2011. Dignity, law and language games. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 25(1): 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neal, Mary. 2012. “Not Gods But Animals”: Human dignity and vulnerable subjecthood. Liverpool Law Review 33(3): 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Davidson, Julia O’Connell. 1998. Prostitution, power and freedom. Padstow: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oliver, Sophie. 2011. Dehumanization: perceiving the body as (In)human. In Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated (ed.) Paulas Kaufmann et al.. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy 24, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    O’Mahony, Connor. 2012. There is no such thing as a right to dignity. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10(2): 551–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pal, Minu, et al. 1998. The wind of change is whispering at your door: The Mahila Samanwaya Committee. In Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, and redefinition, ed. Kamala Kempadoo, and Jo Doezema. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pheterson, Gail. 1993. The whore stigma: Female dishonor and male unworthiness. Social Text 37(Winter): 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Phoenix, Jo. 2008. ASBOs and working women: A new revolving door. In ASBO nation: The criminalisation of nuisance, ed. Peter Squires. Southampton: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pinker, Stephen. 2008. The stupidity of dignity. The New Republic. Accessed 18 June 2015.
  47. 47.
    PONY (Prostitutes of New York). 2005. Statement on dignity. Accessed 18 June 2015.
  48. 48.
    Rao, Neomi. 2011. Three concepts of dignity in constitutional law. Notre Dame Law Review 86(1): 183–271.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Riley, Stephen. 2010. Human dignity: Comparative and conceptual debates. International Journal of Law in Context 6(2): 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sanders, Teela. 2005. Sex work: A risky business. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sanders, Teela. 2009. Controlling the ‘anti sexual’city: Sexual citizenship and the disciplining of female street sex workers. Criminology and Criminal Justice 9(4): 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Scoular, Jane, and Maggie O’Neill. 2007. Regulating prostitution: Social inclusion, responsibilization and the politics of prostitution reform. British Journal of Criminology 47(5): 764–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Scoular, Jane, and Anna Carline. 2014. A critical account of a ‘creeping neo-abolitionism’: Regulating prostitution in England and Wales. Criminology and Criminal Justice 14(5): 608–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Selsen, Oliver. 2011. Human dignity in historical perspective: The contemporary and traditional paradigms. European Journal of Political Theory 10: 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sershow, Scott Cutler. 2013. Deconstructing dignity: A critique of the right-to-die debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shultziner, Doron. 2007. Human dignity: Functions and meanings. In Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation, ed. Jeff Maplas, and Norelle Lickis. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shultziner, Doron, and Guy E. Carmi. 2014. Human dignity in national constitutions: Functions, promises and dangers. American Journal of Comparative Law 62(2): 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Waldron, Jeremy. 2007. Dignity and rank. European Journal of Sociology 48(2): 201–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Whitman, James Q. 2003. On Nazi “Honour” and the New European “Dignity”. In Darker legacies of law in europe: The shadow of national socialism and fascism over europe and its legal traditions, ed. Christian Joerges, and Navraj Singh Ghaleigh. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Whitman, James Q. 2003–2004. The two western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty. Yale Law Journal 113(6): 1151–1221.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Law SchoolUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations