Mugshots and Motherhood: The Media Semiotics of Vilification in Child Abduction Cases

Article

Abstract

The Shannon Matthews case was perhaps unique in British criminal history. For a period of several days, a young girl of 9 years of age was missing from home. During this period there was an unprecedented amount of both police and media attention devoted to the case, including TV appeals for her safe return and offers of financial rewards for information leading to her recovery. Ultimately, it emerged that the mother of the child had conspired with the child’s uncle, who had kidnapped her and kept her captive throughout the period of supposed disappearance. This article uses a corpus of newspaper articles gathered from both the period of the search and subsequently the trial of both the mother and the uncle, which resulted in convictions for both. It examines the representations of all of the actors in this scenario, both visual and verbal, in an attempt to elucidate the ideologies inherent in the case and the ways in which the victim and perpetrators were portrayed throughout the dramatic period of her disappearance.

Keywords

Media representations Child abduction Newspapers Parental abduction Shannon Matthews 

References

  1. 1.
    Birch, H. 1993. If looks could kill: Myra Hindley and the iconography of evil. In Moving targets: Women, murder and representation, ed. H. Birch, 32–62. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyle, K. 2005. Media and violence. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cameron, D. 1996. Wanted: the female serial killer. Trouble and Strife 33: 21–28.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter, C., G. Branston, and S. Allan (eds.). 1998. News, gender and power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chesney-Lind, M. 1999. Contextualizing women’s violence and aggression: beyond denial and demonization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 222–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cotterill, J. 2003. Language and power in court. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Danesi, M. 2002. Understanding media semiotics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grabe, M.E., K.D. Trager, M. Lear, and J. Rauch. 2006. Gender in crime news: A case study test of the chivalry hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society 9(2): 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hasian, M., and L. Flores. 2000. Mass mediated representations of the Susan Smith trial. The Howard Journal of Communication 11: 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Innes, M. 1999. The media as an investigative resource in murder inquiries. British Journal of Criminology 39(2): 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jakobson, R. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in language, ed. T.A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, P., and C. Wardle. 2008. No emotion, no sympathy’: The visual construction of Maxine Carr. Crime Media Culture 4: 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keenan, C. 2000. The same old story: Examining women’s involvement in the initial stages of the criminal justice system. In Feminist perspectives on criminal law, ed. D. Nicolson, and L. Bibbings, 29–48. London: Cavendish.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kennedy, H. 1993. Eve was framed: Women and British justice. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marsh, I., and G. Melville. 2009. Crime, justice and the media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nadel, J. 1995. Sara Thornton: The story of a woman who killed. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naylor, B. 2001. Reporting violence in the British print media: Gendered stories. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 40(2): 180–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nicolson, D. 1994. Truth, reason and justice: Epistemology and politics in evidence discourse. Modern Law Review 57: 726–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prichard, D., and K.H. Hughes. 1997. Patterns of deviance in crime news. Journal of Communication 47(3): 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reiner, R. 2006. Media, crime, law and order. Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies 12: 5–21.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wardle, C. 2007. Monsters and angels: Visual press coverage of child murders in the US and UK, 1930–1990. Journalism 8(4): 281–302.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Winter, J. 2002. The truth will out? The role of judicial advocacy and gender in verdict construction. Social and Legal Studies 11: 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Language and Communication ResearchCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations