“A Short Genealogy of Realism”: Peirce, Kevelson and Legal Semiotics

Article

Abstract

Kevelson remains an important figure in legal semiotics, a co-founder, along with Bernard Jackson, of the International Roundtable for the Semiotics of Law, and of course a valuable and seminal commentator on Peirce in the legal domain. This paper will examine her claim, that through his collaboration with and influence on Oliver Holmes, Peirce should be regarded as a foundational figure in a history of legal realism and modern jurisprudence, and that a legal semiotic can be identified in and not only extrapolated from his seminal writings. This paper will contend that the relationship between Peirce and Holmes should be seen as perplexed and disputatious, rather than close and directly influential, as Kevelson argues. However, regardless of its limitations, Kevelson’s historical inquiry helps provide the ground for a contemporary and historical account of the full picture of a Peircean based legal semiotic and jurisprudence.

References

  1. 1.
    Kevelson, Roberta. 1987. Charles Peirce’s method of method. Amsterdam: Benjamin.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher, William, Morton Horwitz, and Thomas Reed. 1993. American legal realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kevelson, Roberta. 1998. Peirce’s pragmatism. The medium as method. New-York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kevelson, Roberta. 1990. Peirce, paradox. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kevelson, Roberta. 1991. Peirce and law. Issues in pragmatism, legal realism, and semiotics. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Littlejohn, Stephen. 1996. Theories of human communication. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisch, Max H. 1986. In Peirce, semeiotic and pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch, eds. Ketner Kenneth Laine and Christian J. W. Kloesel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peirce, Charles S. 1931-1958. In Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, eds. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, Arthur Burks, 8 volumes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esposito, Joseph L. 1999. Peirce’s theory of semiosis: Toward a logic of mutual affection. Lecture 2: Peirce’s early explorations in triadic metaphysics. http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/epc/srb/cyber/esp2.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2008.
  10. 10.
    Duxbury, Neil. 1995. Patterns of American jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brent, Joseph. 1993. Charles Sanders Peirce: A life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kevelson, Roberta. 1988. The law as a system of signs. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jackson, Bernard. 1985. Semiotics and legal theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schubert, Glendon. 1975. Human jurisprudence—Public law as political science. Hawaii: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Sciences, Media and CommunicationUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations