Skip to main content
Log in

Materialities of Legal Proceedings

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author explores materialities as pre-established and co-producing features of criminal proceedings. This is done by discussing courtrooms, files and stories in relation to English Crown Court hearings. The three materialities gain significance in the course of the court hearing, but do not derive from it. They exceed the course of talk-in-court. Once the hearing started, the pre-established materialities can be referred to but not simply modified. Materialities, in this line, provide stability and guidance for the hearing. They facilitate, purify and condense it. However, their temporal separation causes problems for those who run the show. Materialities can be employed but not fully integrated. Unwelcome parts do, at times, disturb, disrupt and complicate the current dealings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Scheffer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheffer, T. Materialities of Legal Proceedings. Int J Semiot Law 17, 356–389 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-004-4958-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-004-4958-4

Keywords

Navigation