Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Effect of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) on Sexual Function and Sexual Self-Efficacy of Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review

  • Media Review
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review aimed to investigate the effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on sexual performance and sexual self-efficacy of postpartum women. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published between 2016 and 2023. The quality assessment of the selected studies was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted to summarize the results of the included studies. A total of 12 studies were included in this systematic review. The studies selected for this review were interventional (n = 9) and review studies (n = 3). Quality assessment in most studies showed medium to high quality. The results demonstrated that MBCT interventions have a positive effect on the sexual performance and sexual self-efficacy of postpartum women. Improvements in libido, arousal, psychosis, orgasm and overall sexual satisfaction were reported after MBCT intervention. Moreover, the interventions increased postpartum women’s self-efficacy in sexual relationships and communication. The results also showed that MBCT interventions have a promising effect on improving sexual performance and sexual self-efficacy in postpartum women. Incorporating MBCT into postpartum care may help address the sexual health concerns that this population faces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References

  1. Chrzan-Dętkoś, M., Walczak-Kozłowska, T., Lipowska, M.: The need for additional mental health support for women in the postpartum period in the times of epidemic crisis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21(1), 1–9 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sobhgol, S.S., et al.: The effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on female sexual function during pregnancy and postpartum: a systematic review. Sex. Med. Rev. 7(1), 13–28 (2019)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tully, K.P., Stuebe, A.M., Verbiest, S.B.: The fourth trimester: a critical transition period with unmet maternal health needs. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 217(1), 37–41 (2017)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cason, P.P.: Sexuality and sexual health. In: Schuiling, K.D., Likis, F.E. (eds.) Gynecologic Health Care: With an Introduction to Prenatal and Postpartum Care: With an Introduction to Prenatal and Postpartum Care, p. 211. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Serrano Drozdowskyj, E., et al.: Factors influencing couples’ sexuality in the puerperium: a systematic review. Sex. Med. Rev. 8(1), 38–47 (2020)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aghaei, M., et al.: Long-term exposure to air pollution and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight in Tehran, Iran. J. Air Pollut. Health 6(4), 233–242 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas, H.N., et al.: “I want to feel like I used to feel”: a qualitative study of causes of low libido in postmenopausal women. Menopause (New York, NY) 27(3), 289 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Musavi, M., Rahimzadeh, M., EsmaelzadehSaeieh, S.: The effect of education based on the sexual self-concept model on sexual self-efficacy and sexual self-esteem of women after childbirth (2022)

  9. Smoller, J.W.: The genetics of stress-related disorders: PTSD, depression, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 41(1), 297–319 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Naderi, M., et al.: Effect of ozone on the inactivation of indoor airborne viruses with the COVID-19 virus approach: a systematic review. Tehran Univ. Med. J. TUMS Publ. 80(2), 82–90 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shapero, B.G., et al.: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. In: Shapero, B.G., Mischoulon, D., Cusin, C. (eds.) The Massachusetts General Hospital Guide to Depression: New Treatment Insights and Options, pp. 167–177. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Farb, N., et al.: Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depressive disorder with either mindfulness-based cognitive therapy or cognitive therapy. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 86(2), 200 (2018)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bockting, C.L., et al.: A lifetime approach to major depressive disorder: the contributions of psychological interventions in preventing relapse and recurrence. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 41, 16–26 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, K., et al.: An ongoing process of reconnection: a qualitative exploration of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for adults in remission from depression. Psychol. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. 95(1), 173–190 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duma, G., Ülbe, S., Dirik, G.: Mindfulness-based interventions in the treatment of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar 12(1), 72–90 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pepping, C.A., et al.: The effects of mindfulness on sexual outcomes: the role of emotion regulation. Arch. Sex. Behav. 47, 1601–1612 (2018)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Callands, T.A., et al.: The feasibility and acceptability of Project POWER: a mindfulness-infused, cognitive-behavioral group intervention to address mental and sexual health needs of young pregnant women in Liberia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23(1), 1–12 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaderek, I., Lew-Starowicz, M.: A systematic review on mindfulness meditation-based interventions for sexual dysfunctions. J. Sex. Med. 16(10), 1581–1596 (2019)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandes, D.V., et al.: Mindfulness-and compassion-based parenting interventions applied to the postpartum period: a systematic review. J. Child Fam. Stud. 31(2), 563–587 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rizwana, A.: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. Lancet (London, England) 387(10023), 1054 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fard, T.R., Kalantarkousheh, M., Faramarzi, M.: Effect of mindfulness-based cognitive infertility stress therapy on psychological well-being of women with infertility. Middle East Fertility Soc. J. 23(4), 476–481 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khazaeian, S., Navidian, A., Rahiminezhad, M.: Effect of mindfulness on sexual self-efficacy and sexual satisfaction among Iranian postmenopausal women: a quasi-experimental study. Sex. Med. 11(3), qfad031 (2023)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Alahverdi, F., et al.: Effect of mindfulness-based intervention on the treatment of women’s sexual dysfunction: a literature scoping review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 16(6), 1 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lolowang, N.L., Afiyanti, Y., Ungsianik, T.: Kegel’s exercise to improve sexual self-efficacy in primiparous women. Enfermeria Clin. 29, 535–540 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Keramat, A., et al.: Factors influencing stress, anxiety, and depression among Iranian pregnant women: the role of sexual distress and genital self-image. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21(1), 1–12 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alsubaie, M., et al.: Mechanisms of action in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in people with physical and/or psychological conditions: a systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 55, 74–91 (2017)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Page, M.J., et al.: PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n160 (2021)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gholami, S., Naderi, M., Moghaddam, A.M.: Investigation of the survival of bacteria under the influence of supporting electrolytes KCl, CuI and NaBr in the electrochemical method. Ment. Health 4(2), 104–111 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Long, H.A., French, D.P., Brooks, J.M.: Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Res. Methods Med. Health Sci. 1(1), 31–42 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Past, V., et al.: Management of the construction and demolition waste (CDW) and determination of the best disposal alternative by FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process): a case study of Tehran, Iran. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 73(4), 271–284 (2023)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mahmoodi Chalbatani, G., et al.: The integrative multi-omics approach identifies the novel competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network in colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 19454 (2023)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hauck, Y., et al.: Mindfulness-based childbirth education: Incorporating adult and experiential learning with mindfulness-based stress reduction in childbirth education. J. Perinat. Educ. 25(3), 162–173 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Fadai Bashi, A., Tajeri, B., Salehi, M.: The efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on depression, childhood abuse and chronic pain in women. Razavi Int. J. Med. 10(4), 37–43 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rashedi, S., et al.: The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive-behavioral sex therapy on improving sexual desire disorder, sexual distress, sexual self-disclosure and sexual function in women: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Sex Marital Ther. 48(5), 475–488 (2022)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Erfanifar, E., Latifi, S.M., Abbaspoor, Z.: The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural consultation on sexual function and sexual self-efficacy of women after childbirth. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.: X 15, 100157 (2022)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cengizhan, S.Ö., Uçar, T.: The effect of mindfulness-based sexual counseling on sexual distress, attitude toward sexuality, and body image concerns in pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. J. Midwifery Womens Health 68(5), 611–618 (2023)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nezamnia, M., et al.: Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on sexual function and sexual self-efficacy in pregnant women: an RCT. Int. J. Reprod. BioMed. 18(8), 625 (2020)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ismaeilzadeh, N., Akbari, B.: Effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in sexual self-efficacy and marital satisfaction among couples with marital conflicts. Avicenna J. Neuro Psycho Physiol. 7(1), 29–36 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Askari, S., Behroozi, N., Abbaspoor, Z.: The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive-behavioral therapy on premenstrual syndrome. Iran Red Crescent Med J 20(2), 57538 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abbaspoor, Z., et al.: Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of mindful eating questionnaire in women who seeking weight reduction. J. Eat. Disord. 6(1), 1–8 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Newcombe, B.C., Weaver, A.D.: Mindfulness, cognitive distraction, and sexual well-being in women. Can. J. Hum. Sex. 25(2), 99–108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Borujeni, E.T., et al.: Identification and determination of the volatile organics of third-hand smoke from different cigarettes and clothing fabrics. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 20(1), 53–63 (2022)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Poston, P.D.: Change of Heart: An Integral Inquiry into Prenatal Depression, Heartmath, and Transformation. Sofia University, Sofia (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Moradi, M., Alimohammadi, M., Naderi, M.: Measurement of total amount of volatile organic compounds in fresh and indoor air in four kindergartens in Ahvaz City. ISMJ 19(5), 871–876 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Padoa, A., et al.: The overactive pelvic floor (OPF) and sexual dysfunction. Part 2: evaluation and treatment of sexual dysfunction in OPF patients. Sex. Med. Rev. 9(1), 76–92 (2021)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, Y., et al.: A study on the effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and loving-kindness mediation on depression, rumination, mindfulness level and quality of life in depressed patients. Am. J. Transl. Res. 13(5), 4666 (2021)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Nekoei, M., et al.: Effectiveness of mindfulness-based counseling on the health promoting lifestyle in Iranian middle-aged women: an experimental study. Mod. Care J. 21(1), e138180 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lin, C.-Y., et al.: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Sexuality (MBCT-S) improves sexual functioning and intimacy among older women with epilepsy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Seizure 73, 64–74 (2019)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dunkley, C.R., Brotto, L.A.: Psychological treatments for provoked vestibulodynia: integration of mindfulness-based and cognitive behavioral therapies. J. Clin. Psychol. 72(7), 637–650 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ebrahimnejad, M., et al.: Complicated role of exercise in modulating memory: a discussion of the mechanisms involved. Neurochem. Res. 47(6), 1477–1490 (2022)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Dunkley, C.R., Goldsmith, K.M., Gorzalka, B.B.: The potential role of mindfulness in protecting against sexual insecurities. Can. J. Hum. Sex. 24(2), 92–103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Raspovic, A.M., et al.: Mothers’ experiences of the relationship between body image and exercise, 0–5 years postpartum: a qualitative study. Body Image 35, 41–52 (2020)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dubé, J.: Emotion Regulation and Sexual Well-Being Among Long-Term Couples. Dalhousie University, Halifax (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saraswat, N., et al.: A detailed biological approach on hormonal imbalance causing depression in critical periods (postpartum, postmenopausal and perimenopausal depression) in adult women. Open Biol. J. 9(1), 17–35 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors listed have significantly contributed to the development and the writing of this article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Abbaspoor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

All authors are interested in the treatment of sexual disorders and sexual intercourse problems.

Appendices

Appendix 1

PRISMA_2020_Checklist

Section and Topic

Item #

Checklist item

Reported (Yes/No)

TITLE

  

Yes

Title

1

Identify the report as a systematic review

Yes

ABSTRACT

  

Yes

Abstract

2

See the PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts checklist

Yes

INTRODUCTION

  

Yes

Rationale

3

Describe the rationale for the review in the context of existing knowledge

Yes

Objectives

4

Provide an explicit statement of the objective(s) or question(s) the review addresses

Yes

METHODS

  

Yes

Eligibility criteria

5

Specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review and how studies were grouped for the syntheses

Yes

Information sources

6

Specify all databases, registers, websites, organizations, reference lists and other sources searched or consulted to identify studies. Specify the date when each source was last searched or consulted

Yes

Search strategy

7

Present the full search strategies for all databases, registers and websites, including any filters and limits used

Yes

Selection process

8

Specify the methods used to decide whether a study met the inclusion criteria of the review, including how many reviewers screened each record and each report retrieved, whether they worked independently, and if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process

Yes

Data collection process

9

Specify the methods used to collect data from reports, including how many reviewers collected data from each report, whether they worked independently, any processes for obtaining or confirming data from study investigators, and if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process

Yes

Data items

10 a

List and define all outcomes for which data were sought. Specify whether all results that were compatible with each outcome domain in each study were sought (e.g. for all measures, time points, analyses), and if not, the methods used to decide which results to collect

Yes

 

10 b

List and define all other variables for which data were sought (e.g. participant and intervention characteristics, funding sources). Describe any assumptions made about any missing or unclear information

Yes

Study risk of bias assessment

11

Specify the methods used to assess risk of bias in the included studies, including details of the tool(s) used, how many reviewers assessed each study and whether they worked independently, and if applicable, details of automation tools used in the process

No

Effect measures

12

Specify for each outcome the effect measure(s) (e.g. risk ratio, mean difference) used in the synthesis or presentation of results

No

Synthesis methods

13a

Describe the processes used to decide which studies were eligible for each synthesis (e.g. tabulating the study intervention characteristics and comparing against the planned groups for each synthesis (item #5))

Yes

 

13b

Describe any methods required to prepare the data for presentation or synthesis, such as handling of missing summary statistics, or data conversions

Yes

 

13 c

Describe any methods used to tabulate or visually display results of individual studies and syntheses

Yes

 

13d

Describe any methods used to synthesize results and provide a rationale for the choice(s). If meta-analysis was performed, describe the model(s), method(s) to identify the presence and extent of statistical heterogeneity, and software package(s) used

Yes

 

13e

Describe any methods used to explore possible causes of heterogeneity among study results (e.g. subgroup analysis, meta-regression)

Yes

 

13f

Describe any sensitivity analyses conducted to assess robustness of the synthesized results

Yes

Reporting bias assessment

14

Describe any methods used to assess risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (arising from reporting biases)

No

Certainty assessment

15

Describe any methods used to assess certainty (or confidence) in the body of evidence for an outcome

Yes

Study selection

16a

Describe the results of the search and selection process, from the number of records identified in the search to the number of studies included in the review, ideally using a flow diagram

Yes

 

16b

Cite studies that might appear to meet the inclusion criteria, but which were excluded, and explain why they were excluded

Yes

Study characteristics

17

Cite each included study and present its characteristics

Yes

Risk of bias in studies

18

Present assessments of risk of bias for each included study

No

Results of individual studies

19

For all outcomes, present, for each study: (a) summary statistics for each group (where appropriate) and (b) an effect estimate and its precision (e.g. confidence/credible interval), ideally using structured tables or plots

Yes

Results of syntheses

20a

For each synthesis, briefly summaries the characteristics and risk of bias among contributing studies

Yes

 

20b

Present results of all statistical syntheses conducted. If meta-analysis was done, present for each the summary estimate and its precision (e.g. confidence/credible interval) and measures of statistical heterogeneity. If comparing groups, describe the direction of the effect

Yes

 

20c

Present results of all investigations of possible causes of heterogeneity among study results

Yes

 

20d

Present results of all sensitivity analyses conducted to assess the robustness of the synthesized results

Yes

Reporting biases

21

Present assessments of risk of bias due to missing results (arising from reporting biases) for each synthesis assessed

No

Certainty of evidence

22

Present assessments of certainty (or confidence) in the body of evidence for each outcome assessed

Yes

DISCUSSION

  

Yes

Discussion

23a

Provide a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence

Yes

 

23b

Discuss any limitations of the evidence included in the review

Yes

 

23c

Discuss any limitations of the review processes used

Yes

 

23d

Discuss implications of the results for practice, policy, and future research

Yes

OTHER INFORMATION

  

Yes

Registration of protocol

24a

Provide registration information for the review, including register name and registration number, or state that the review was not registered

No

 

24b

Indicate where the review protocol can be accessed, or state that a protocol was not prepared

No

 

24c

Describe and explain any amendments to information provided at registration or in the protocol

No

Support

25

Describe sources of financial or non-financial support for the review, and the role of the funders or sponsors in the review

Yes

Competing interests

26

Declare any competing interests of review authors

Yes

Availability of data, code and other materials

27

Report which of the following are publicly available and where they can be found: template data collection forms; data extracted from included studies; data used for all analyses; analytic code; any other materials used in the review

Yes

  1. From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Appendix 2

PRISMA_2020_Abstract_Checklist

Section and Topic

Item #

Checklist item

Reported (Yes/No)

TITLE

  

Yes

Title

1

Identify the report as a systematic review

Yes

BACKGROUND

  

Yes

Objectives

2

Provide an explicit statement of the main objective(s) or question(s) the review addresses

Yes

METHODS

  

Yes

Eligibility criteria

3

Specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review

Yes

Information sources

4

Specify the information sources (e.g. databases, registers) used to identify studies and the date when each was last searched

Yes

Risk of bias

5

Specify the methods used to assess risk of bias in the included studies

No

Synthesis of results

6

Specify the methods used to present and synthesize results

Yes

RESULTS

  

Yes

Included studies

7

Give the total number of included studies and participants and summaries relevant characteristics of studies

Yes

Synthesis of results

8

Present results for main outcomes, preferably indicating the number of included studies and participants for each. If meta-analysis was done, report the summary estimate and confidence/credible interval. If comparing groups, indicate the direction of the effect (i.e. which group is favored)

Yes

DISCUSSION

  

Yes

Limitations of evidence

9

Provide a brief summary of the limitations of the evidence included in the review (e.g. study risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision)

Yes

Interpretation

10

Provide a general interpretation of the results and important implications

Yes

OTHER

  

Yes

Funding

11

Specify the primary source of funding for the review

Yes

Registration

12

Provide the register name and registration number

No

  1. From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic. Reviews: BMJ 2021; 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Appendix 3

Study name

Questionnaire

1. Clarity of study objectives

2. Appropriateness of the methodology

3. Appropriateness of the study design

4. Suitability of the research strategy

5. Adequacy of inclusion criteria

6. Correctness of data extraction

7. Appropriateness of quality assessment tool researchers

8. Correctness of data synthesis

9. Evaluation of i the results interpretation

10. The clarity of the results report

11. Compliance with ethical considerations

Overall quality

Jaderek et al. 2019

+

+

+

?

+

+

?

Moderate

Hauck et al. 2016

+

+

+

+

?

?

?

?

+

+

+

High

Fernandes et al. 2022

+

+

+

+

?

?

?

+

+

+

+

High

Fadai Basi et al. 2022

+

+

+

+

+

+

?

+

+

+

Moderate

Khazaeian et al. 2023

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

?

?

?

+

High

Rashedi et al. 2022

+

+

+

+

+

?

?

+

+

+

+

High

Erfanifar et al. 2022

+

+

?

+

+

?

?

+

?

+

+

High

Cengizhan et al. 2023

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

?

+

+

+

High

Alahverdi et al. 2022

+

+

+

+

+

+

?

?

+

+

+

High

Nezamnia et al. 2020

+

+

?

+

?

+

+

+

+

+

+

High

Musavi et al. 2022

+

+

+

+

?

+

?

+

+

+

+

High

Ismaeilzadeh et al. 2020

?

+

?

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

High

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erfanifar, E., Abbaspoor, Z., Khaksar Boldaji, S. et al. Evaluating the Effect of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) on Sexual Function and Sexual Self-Efficacy of Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review. Sex Disabil (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-024-09843-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-024-09843-0

Keywords

Navigation