Research on women with disabilities has found that the most common perpetrators of violence were current or former intimate partners (Young et al. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, S34–S38, 1997; Riddington, Beating the “odds”: Violence and Women with Disabilities (Position Paper 2). 1989). This article examines intimate partner sexual and physical abuse experienced by women with disabilities compared to women without disabilities and men with and without disabilities through chi square analysis and regression analysis using data from the 2005 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Results show that women with disabilities experienced almost twice the rate of all forms of abuse compared to the other populations. Variables increasing the likelihood of abuse include being female, disabled, not employed, uncoupled and younger age. Implications for future research, screening and intervention for rehabilitation professionals are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Collins, K.S., Schoen, S.J., Duchon, L., Simantor, E., Yellowitz, M.: Health Concerns across a Women’s Lifespan: The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Women’s Health. Commonwealth Fund, New York (1999).
Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N.: Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington (2000).
Young, M.E., Nosek, M.A., Howland, C.A., Chanpong, G., Rintala, D.H.: Prevalence of abuse of women with physical disabilities. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, S34–S38 (1997).
Finkelhor, D., Korbin, J.: Child abuse as an international issue. Child Abuse Negl. 12, 3–23 (1988).
Claussen, A.H., Crittenden, P.M.: Physical and psychological maltreatment: relations among types of maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 15, 5–18 (1991).
Soeken, K., McFarlane, J., Parker, B., Campbell, J.C.: The abuse assessment screen: A clinical instrument to measure frequency, severity and perpetrator of abuse against women. In: Soeken, K., McFarlane, J., Parker, B., Campbell, J.C. (eds.) Beyond Diagnosis: Health Care Advocacy for Battered Women and their Children. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1997).
Cole, S.S.: Facing the challenges of sexual abuse in persons with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 7, 71–88 (1984).
Brownridge, D.A.: Partner violence against women with disabilities: prevalence, risk, and explanations. Violence Against Women 12, 805–822 (2006).
Martin, S.L., Ray, N., Sotres-Alvarez, D., Kupper, L.L., Moracco, K.E., Dickens, P.A.: Physical and sexual assault of women with disabilities. Violence Against Women 12, 823–837 (2006).
Nosek, M.A., Howland, C.A., Young, M.E.: Abuse of women with disabilities: policy implications. J. Dis. Pol. Stud. 8, 157–176 (1997).
Nosek, M.A., Foley, C.C., Hughes, R.B., Howland, C.A.: Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 19, 177–189 (2001).
Hassouneh-Phillips, D., Curry, M.A.: Abuse of women with disabilities: state of the science. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 45, 96–104 (2002).
Gilson, S., Cramer, E., DePoy E.: (Re)defining abuse of women with disabilities: a paradox of limitation and expansion. AFFILIA: J. Women Soc. Work 16, 220–235 (2001).
Curry, M.A., Hassouneh-Phillips, D.H., Johnston-Silverberg, A.J.: Abuse of women with disabilities: an ecological model and review. Violence Against Women 7, 60–79 (2001).
Riddington, J.: Beating the “Odds”: Violence and Women with Disabilities (Position Paper 2). DisAbled Women’s Network, Vancouver (1989).
Andrews, A.B., Veronen, L.J.: Sexual assault and people with disabilities. Special issue: sexuality and disabilities: a guide for human service practitioners. J. Soc. Work Hum. Sex 8, 137–159 (1993).
Belsky, J.: Child maltreatment: an ecological integration. Am. Psychol. 35, 320–335 (1980).
Rutgers University, Bureau of Economic Research, and The World Institute on Disability: Towards an understanding of the demand for personal assistance. Rutgers, n.d., New Brunswick, NJ.
Womendez, C., Schneiderman, K.: Escaping from abuse: unique issues for women with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 9, 273–280 (1991).
Farmer, A., Tiefenthaler, J.: Domestic violence: the value of services as signals. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 274–279 (1996).
Nosek, M.A.: Sexual abuse of women with physical disabilities. In: Krotoski, D.M., Nosek, M.A., Turk, M.A. (eds.) Women with Physical Disabilities: Achieving and Maintaining Health and Well-being, pp. 153–173. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore (1996).
Carlson, B.E.: Domestic violence in adults with mental retardation: reports from victims and key informants. Ment. Health Asp. Dev. Disabil. 1, 102–112 (1998).
Schaller, J., Fieberg, J.L.: Issues of abuse for women with disabilities and implications for rehabilitation counseling. J. Appl. Rehabil. Couns. 29, 9–17 (1998).
Asch, A., Fine, M.: Introduction: Beyond pedestals. In: Fine, M., Asch, A. (eds.) Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture and Politics, pp. 1–37. Temple University Press, Philadelphia (1988).
Anderson, K.L.: Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist an family violence approaches. J. Marriage Fam. 59, 655–669 (1997).
Nosek, M.A., Hughes, R.B., Taylor, H.B., Taylor, P.: Disability, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics of abused women with physical disabilities. Violence Against Women 12, 838–850 (2006).
Hightower, J., Smith, G.: Aging, disabilities, and abuse. Aware: Newslett. BC Inst. Against Fam. Violence 10, 17–18 (2003).
Carlson, B.E.: Mental retardation and domestic violence: an ecological approach to intervention. Soc. Work 42, 79–89 (1997).
Crossmaker, M.: Behind locked doors: institutional sexual abuse. Sex. Disabil. 7, 201–219 (1991).
Furey, E.M.: Sexual abuse of adults with mental retardation: who and where. Ment. Retard. 32, 173–180 (1994).
Nelson, D.E., Holtzman, D., Bolen, J., Stanwyck, C.A., Mack, K.A.: Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soc. Prev. Med. 46(Suppl.), S03–S42 (2001).
Nelson, D.E., Powell-Griner, E., Town, M., Kovar, M.G.: A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Am. J. Pub. Health 93, 1335–1341 (2003).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved July, 2004 from http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/faqs.htm (2004). Accessed 9 Oct 2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System user’s guide. Author, Atlanta (1998).
SPSS : SPSS release 14.0. SPSS, Inc., Chicago (2006).
Nosek, M.A., Howland, C.A., Hughes, R.B.: The investigation of abuse and women with disabilities: going beyond assumptions. Violence Against Women 7, 477–499 (2001).
Mays, J.M.: Feminist disability theory: domestic violence against women with a disability. Disabil. Societ. 21, 147–158 (2006).
McFarlane, J., Hughes, R.B., Nosek, M.A., Groff, J.Y., Swedlund, N., Dolan Mullen, P.: Abuse Assessment Screen-Disability (AAS-D): measuring frequency, type, and perpetrator of abuse toward women with disabilities. J. Women’s Health 10, 861–866 (2001).
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, D.L. Disability, Gender and Intimate Partner Violence: Relationships from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sex Disabil 26, 15–28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-007-9064-6