Abstract
This article discusses assessment of sexual consent capacity, its ethical and legal mandates, and a rationale for the assessment of capacity to have a sexual relationship. It reports current assessment practices used by the authors as well as a summary of relevant literature. There is a review and discussion of New York laws, National and State court cases, and policies of National and international authorities relevant to sexual relations between persons who have intellectual disabilities. Technical information about a tool for assessing capacity to give consent for sexual relationships is described. A proposed clinical standard for use in assessing the capacity of a person with cognitive impairments to have a sexual relationship is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carney, M.T., Neugroschl, J., Morrison, R.S., Marin, D., Siu, A.L.: The development and piloting of a capacity assessment tool. J. Clin. Ethics. 12, 17–23 (2001).
Orel, N.: Ethical considerations in assessing the competency of older adults: a provision of informed consent. J. Ment. Health Couns. 20, 189–202 (1998).
Stavis, P.: (1991, November/December), Sexual Activity and the Law of Consent. Quality Care Newsletter, Albany, NY.
LaRue, A., Markee, T.: Clinical assessment research with older adults. Psychol. Assess. 7, 376–386 (1995).
American Psychological Association: Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am. Psychol. 57, 1060–1073 (2002).
New York Criminal Law Statutes, Penal Law Section 130 (1997).
Kennedy, C., Niederbuhl, J.: Establishing criteria for sexual capacity consent. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 106, 503–510 (2001).
Murphy, G., O’Callaghan, A.: Capacity of adults with intellectual disabilities to consent to sexual relationships. Psychol. Med. 34, 1347–1357 (2004).
Howe, E.: Considerations for the Development of Agency Policies Concerning Sexual Contact and Consent. New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Albany, NY (1993).
New York Mental Hygiene Law, Article 81, 1992 recodification.
New York Codes, Rules and Regulations, Mental Hygiene Regulations, Chapter XIV, Office of Mental Retardation, New York, § 633.20 (January 1, 1995).
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
National Guardianship Association: Standards of Practice (2003) Retrieved November 6, 2006 from the National Guardianship Web site: http://www.guardianship.org/members/pdf/standards.pdf.
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilies: AAMR/ARC position statement on sexuality (2004) Retrieved August 9, 2006, from http://www.aamr.org/Policies/pos_sexuality.shtml.
Meijer, M., Carpenter, S., Scholte, F.: European manifesto on basic standards of health care for people with intellectual disabilities. J. Policy Pract. Intellect. Disabil. 1, 10–15 (2004).
Economic and Social Council: General Comment 5, Implementation of the international covenant on economic social and cultural rights. United Nations Document E/C. 12/1994/13. United Nations, New York (1994).
Lyden, M.: Capacity issues related to the health care proxy. Ment. Retard. 44, 272–282 (2006).
Cea, C.D., Fisher, C.B.: Health care decision-making by adults with mental retardation. Ment. Retard. 41, 78–87 (2003).
Krynski, M., Tymchuk, A., Ouslander, J.: How informed can consent be? New lights on comprehension among elderly people making decisions about enteral tube feeding. Gerontologist 34, 36–43 (1994).
People v. Easley, 42 N.Y.2d 50 (New York Court of Appeals, June 16,1977).
People v. Cratsley, 86 N.Y. 2d 81 (New York Court of Appeals, July 5, 1995).
New Jersey v. Scherzer et al., 694 A.2d 196 (N.J. Super. 1997).
State of New Jersey v. Olivio, 123 N.J. 550,589 A.2d 597 (S.Ct.N.J. 1991).
Sundram, C., Stavis, P.: Sexuality and intellectual disabilities. Ment. Retard. 32, 255–264 (1994).
National Association for the Mentally Handicapped of Ireland: Who decides and how? People with intellectual disabilities—legal capacity and decision making. National Association for the Mentally Handicapped of Ireland, Dublin (October, 2003).
British Medical Association and Law Society: Assessment of mental capacity: Guidance for doctors and lawyers. British Medical Association, London (1995).
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Making health care decisions, volume one. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1982).
Ames, T., Samowitz, P.: Inclusionary standard for determining sexual consent for individuals with developmental disabilities. Ment. Retard. 4, 264–268 (1995).
Kaeser, F.: Can people with severe mental retardation consent to mutual sex? Sex. Disabil. 10, 33–42 (1992).
Kennedy, C.: Legal and psychological implications in the assessment of sexual consent in the cognitively impaired population. Assessment 10, 352–358 (2003).
Chivers, J., Mathieson, S.: Training in sexuality and relationships: an Australian model. Sex. Disabil. 18, 73–80 (2000).
Doyle, C.: Guardianship. Workshop presented at the Albany Law School Institute of Legal Studies Disability Law Day Conference. Albany, NY (June, 2002).
McKinney’s Session Laws of New York, Laws of 1990, St. Paul, West Publishing, MN (1991).
Dinerstein, R., Herr, S., O’Sullivan, J. (eds.): A Guide to Consent. American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC (1999).
Proctor, A.W.: Ethical issues in research with dementia patients: a neuroscience perspective. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr. 10, 653–654 (1995).
Storandt, M.: General principles of assessment of older adults. In Storandt, M., VandenBos G.R. (eds.) Neuropsychological Assessment of Dementia and Depression in Older Adults: A Clinician’s Guide, pp. 7–32. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1994).
Grisso, T., Appelbaum, P.: Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment. Oxford University Press, New York (1998).
Morris, C., Niederbuhl, J., Mahr, J.: Determining the capability of individuals with mental retardation to give informed consent. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 98, 263–272 (1993).
Lyden, M., Peters, M.: Assessing capacity for informed consent: a rationale and protocol. Ment. Health Asp. Dev. Disabil. 7, 97–106 (2004).
Stavis, P, Walker-Hirsch, L.W.: Consent to sexual activity. In: Dinerstein, R. et al. (eds.) A Guide to Consent, pp. 57–67. American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC (1999).
Moye, J., Karel, M., Azar, A., Gurrera, J.: Capacity to consent to treatment: empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia. Gerontologist 2, 166–175 (2004).
Youngberg v. Romeo: 457 US 307, 102 Supreme Court 2452 (June 18, 1982).
Kennedy, C.: Assessing competency to consent to sexual activity in the cognitively impaired population. J. Forensic Neuropsychol. 1, 17–33 (1999).
Murphy, G.: Capacity to consent to sexual relationships in adults with learning disabilities. J. Family Plan. Reprod. Health Care. 29, 148–149 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Grateful appreciation is expressed to the following persons who provided valuable information and advice during the development of the manuscript: Steve Marcal, Dan Godfrey, Sheila Shea, and Patrick O'Donnell.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyden, M. Assessment of Sexual Consent Capacity. Sex Disabil 25, 3–20 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-006-9028-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-006-9028-2