Abstract
One focus of research concerning offending behavior has been the concept of the cognitive distortion, although the importance of the need for research into the underlying cognitive structures in offenders has been highlighted. This study examined schemas in child molesters, rapists, and violent offenders, predicting content differences in the offence-related schemas between these groups. In accordance with previous research, the prevalence of a “suspiciousness/hostility to women” schema in rapists was predicted. Twelve rapists, twelve child molesters, and twelve violent offenders incarcerated in a male maximum-security prison completed “Life Maps” (autobiographies) and the My Life questionnaire (R. E. Mann & C. R. Hollin, 2001), both designed to indicate the presence of schemas. A content analysis template containing nine schemas was constructed and applied to the Life Map data. Results showed a significant difference in the prevalence of schema type between the three groups. There was a prevalence of a “hostility/distrust of women” schema in the rapists. Analysis of the My Life questionnaire revealed a difference between violent offenders and rapists only. This study highlights the need for further research into schemas with sexual and violent offenders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer, M. W. (2000). Classical content analysis: A review. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative research with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 131–151). London: Sage.
Beck, A. (1999). Prisoner of hate. The cognitive basis of anger, hostility, and violence. New York: HarperCollins.
Blumenthal, S., Gudjonsson, G., & Burns, J. (1999). Cognitive distortions and blame attribution in sex offenders against adults and children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 129–143.
Bumby, K. (1995). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the RAPE and MOLEST scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37–54.
Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145–153.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eckhardt, C. I., & Dye, M. L. (2000). The cognitive characteristics of maritally violent men: Theory and evidence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 139–158.
Francis, G. (1998). Multivariate analysis of variance. Melbourne, Australia: Swinburne University of Technology.
Friendship, C., Mann, R. E., & Beech, A. R. (2003). Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders in England and Wales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 735–743.
Hanson, R. K., Gizarelli, R., & Scott, H. (1994). The attitudes of incest offenders: Sexual entitlement and acceptance of sex with children. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 21, 187–202.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. London: Academic.
Malamuth, N. M., & Brown, L. M. (1994). Sexually aggressive men's perceptions of women's communications: Testing three explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 699–712.
Mann, R. E. (2004). An investigation of the nature, content, and influence of schemas in sexual offending. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leicester, England.
Mann, R. E., & Beech, A. R. (2003). Cognitive distortions, schemas, and implicit theories. In T. Ward, D. R. Laws, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 135–153). London: Sage.
Mann, R. E., & Hollin, C. R. (2001, November). Schemas: A model for understanding cognition in sexual offending. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Research and Treatment Conference, Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, TX.
Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., & Fernandez, Y. M. (1995). Some aspects of social competence in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 113–127.
Marshall, W. L., Champagne, F., Brown, C., & Miller, S. (1997). Empathy, intimacy, loneliness, and self-esteem in nonfamilial child molesters. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 87–97.
Marshall, W. L., & McGuire, J. (2003). Effect sizes in the treatment of sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 653–663.
Murphy, W. D. (1991). Assessment and modification of cognitive distortions in child molesters. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 331–342). New York: Plenum.
Polaschek, D. L. L., & Gannon, T. A. (2004). The implicit theories of rapists: What convicted offenders tell us. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 299–314.
Polaschek, D. L. L., & Ward, T. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 7, 385–406.
Polaschek, D. L. L., Ward, T., & Hudson, S. (1997). Rape and rapists: Theory and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 117–144.
Proulx, J., Perrault, C., & Ouimet, M. (1999). Pathways in the offending process of extra-familial child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 117–129.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Russell, R. J., & Hulson, B. (1991). Physical and psychological abuse of hetereosexual partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 457–473.
Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530–544.
Segal, Z. (1988). Appraisal of the self-schema: Construct in cognitive models of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 147–162.
Segal, Z. V., & Stermac, L. E. (1990). The role of cognition in sexual assault. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 161–174). New York: Plenum.
Ward, T. (2000). Sexual offenders' cognitive distortions as implicit theories. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 5, 491–507.
Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Johnston, L., & Marshall, W. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 479–507.
Ward, T., & Keenan, T. (1999). Child molesters' implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 821–838.
Ward, T., Louden, K., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1995). A descriptive model of the offense chain for child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 452–472.
Webster, S. D. (2002). Assessing victim empathy in sexual offenders using the victim letter task. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 281–300.
Webster, S. D., & Beech, A. R. (2000). The nature of sex offenders affective empathy: A grounded theory analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 249–261.
Webster, S. D., & Marshall, W. L. (2004). Generating data with sexual offenders using qualitative material: A paradigm to complement not compete with quantitative methodology. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10, 117–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Milner, R.J., Webster, S.D. Identifying Schemas in Child Molesters, Rapists, and Violent Offenders. Sex Abuse 17, 425–439 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-005-8053-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-005-8053-5