Sexual Offenders Against Children: The Influence of Personality and Obsessionality on Cognitive Distortions

Article
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Sexual offenders against children are generally inadequate in their social functioning and diverse in their psychopathology. The degree to which this inadequate functioning and psychopathology influences therapeutic interventions brings into question the belief that generic nonclinical programmatic treatment work is always appropriate for such a cohort. The Sex Offenders Assessment Package (SOAP) measures inadequate social functioning and sexual deviance, but has not been linked to broader individual differences and generic psychopathology. We collected information examining the relationship between the SOAP and standard measures of personality (the NEO-FFI) and obsessive-compulsiveness (MOCI) in a sample of 200 sexual offenders against children seen by the Probation Service. Factor analysis was used to reduce the SOAP to three reliable factors: emotional distress, cognitions supporting sex with children, and concern for others. These factors correlated respectively with higher Neuroticism and lower Extroversion; greater obsessive-compulsiveness on the MOCI, and trait Agreeableness, irrespective of whether or not one corrected for socially desirable responding. When partial correlation controlled for the influence of Neuroticism on the correlation between cognitions supporting sex with children and the MOCI, there was no change in the association between these variables. These results show that negative affect and obsessional tendencies are important underlying influences on the feelings and behavior of sexual offenders, that the obsessionality of the group is not attributable to Neuroticism, and suggest useful additional foci to enhance the treatment of this diverse clinical group.

Key Words

sexual offenders paedophilia obsessions obsessive-compulsiveness personality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balyk, E. D. (1997). Paraphilias as a sub type of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A hypothetical bio-social model. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, 12, 29–42.Google Scholar
  2. Beckett, R. C. (1987). The Children and Sex Questionnaire. R. Beckett, Oxford Regional Forensic Service, Fairmile Hospital, Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 9HH, England.Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, R. C., & Fisher, D. (1994, November). Assessing victim empathy: A new measure. Paper presented to the 13th annual conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. Beech, A. R. (1998). A psychometric typology of child abusers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 319–339.Google Scholar
  5. Beech, A. R., Fisher, D., Beckett, R. C., & Fordham, A. S. (1998). An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme. Research Findings, 79, 1–4. (Available from Information and Publications Group, Room 201, Home Office, 590 Queen Anne’s Gate, London, SW1 9AT, England).Google Scholar
  6. Canter, D., Hughes, D., & Kirby, S. (1998). Paedophilia: Pathology, criminality, or both? The development of a multivariate model of offence behavior in child sexual abuse. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 9, 532–555.Google Scholar
  7. Caruso, J. C., Witkiewitz, K., Belcourt-Dittloff, A., & Gottlieb, J. D. (2001). Reliability of scores from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 675–689.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, D. A., Purdon, C., & Wang, A. (2003). The Meta-Cognitive Beliefs Questionnaire: Development of a measure of obsessional beliefs. Behavior Research and Therapy, 41, 655–669.Google Scholar
  9. Cliffordson, C. (2001). Parents’ judgements and students’ self-judgements of empathy: the structure of empathy and agreement of judgements based on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 36–47.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The NEO Personality Inventory. Miami, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multi-dimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Printed in Salter, A. C. (1988). Treating child sex offenders and their victims: a practical guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Dennison, S. M., Stough, C., & Birgden, A. (2001). A dimensional personality approach to understanding sex offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7, 243–262.Google Scholar
  13. Egan, V., Auty, J., Miller, R., Ahmadi, S., Richardson, C., & Gargan, I. (1999). Sensational interests and general personality traits. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 10, 567–582.Google Scholar
  14. Egan, V., Deary, I. J., & Austin, E. (2000). The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms, an item-level analysis, and a note of caution about the scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 907–920.Google Scholar
  15. Egan, V., Elliot, D., Patel, D., & Charlesworth, C. (2003). Personality disorders and sensational interests in mentally disordered offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 51–62.Google Scholar
  16. Eysenck, H. J. (1971). Personality and sexual adjustment. British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 593–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fagan, P. J., Wise, T. N., Schmidt, C. W., Ponticas, Y., Marshall, R. D., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). A comparison of the five-factor personality dimensions in males with sexual dysfunction and males with paraphillia. Journal of Personality Assessment, 5, 434–448.Google Scholar
  18. Falshaw, L., Bates, A., Patel, V., Corbett, C., & Friendship, C. (2003). Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 207–215.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, D., & Mair, G. (1998). A review of classification systems for sex offenders. HORSD Research Findings No. 78. Home Office, London.Google Scholar
  20. Fisher, D., Beech, A., & Browne, K. (1999). Comparison of sex offenders to nonoffenders on selected psychological measures. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 473–491.Google Scholar
  21. Friendship, C., Mann, R. E., & Beech, A. R. (2003). Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders in england and wales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 744–759.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gingrich, T. N., & Campbell, J. B. (1995). Personality characteristics of sexual offenders. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 2, 54–61.Google Scholar
  23. Gold, S. N., Heffner, C. L. (1998). Sexual addiction: Many conceptions, minimal data. Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 367–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, G. C. N. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802–809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanson, R. K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Follow-up data from 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046–1062.Google Scholar
  26. Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Heil, P., Ahlmeyer, S., & Simons, D. 92003). Crossover sexual offences. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 221–236.Google Scholar
  28. Hodgson, R. J., & Rachman, S. (1977). Obsessional-compulsive complaints. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 15, 389–395.Google Scholar
  29. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keltner, A. A., Marshall, P. G., & Marshall, W. L. (1981). Measurement and correlation of assertiveness and social fear in a prison population. Corrective and Social Psychiatry, 27, 41–47.Google Scholar
  31. Knight, R. A., & Prenty, R. A. (1990). Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corrobation of taxonomic models. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Levin, S. M., & Stava, L. (1987). Personality characteristics of sex offenders: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 57–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshall, W. L., Anderson, D., & Fernadez, Y. (1999). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Sexual Offenders. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., & Fernandez, Y. M. (1995). Some aspects of social competence in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 113–127.Google Scholar
  35. Marshall, L. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2001). Excessive sexual desire disorder among sexual offenders: The development of a research project. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity. Special Issue: Preparing for DSM-V, 8, 301–307.Google Scholar
  36. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism scales with measures of the five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 587–597.Google Scholar
  37. Nowicki, S. (1976). Adult Nowicki-Strickland Internal-External Locus of Control scale. Printed in Salter, A. C. (1988). Treating child sex offenders and their victims: Apractical guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Nowicki, S., & Duke, M. P. (1974). A locus of control scale for non-college as well as college adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 136–137.Google Scholar
  39. Nowicki, S. Jr., & Duke, M. P. (1982). Areview of theNowicki–strickland locus of control scales. In H. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct: Vol. 2. Methods and application. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. O’Connor, B. (2000). SPSS, SAS and MATLAB programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32, 396–402.Google Scholar
  41. Purdon, C., & Clark, D. A. (1993). Obsessive intrusive thoughts in nonclinical subjects: I. Content and relation with depressive, anxious and obsessional symptoms. Behavior Research and Therapy, 31, 713–720.Google Scholar
  42. Raymond, N. C., Coleman, E., & Miner, M. H. (2003.) Psychiatric comorbidity and compulsive/impulsive traits in compulsive sexual behavior. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 44, 370–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Renaud, C. A., & Byers, E. S. (2001). Positive and negative sexual cognitions: Subjective experience and relationships to sexual adjustment. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 252–262.Google Scholar
  44. Reece, J. T. (1979). Obsessive compulsive behavior: The nuisance offender. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 48, 6–12.Google Scholar
  45. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. A. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sahota, K., & Chesterman, P. (1998). Mentally ill sex offenders in a regional secure unit. II: Cognitions, perceptions and fantasies. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 9, 161–172.Google Scholar
  47. Salkovskis, P. M., Forrester, E., & Richards, C. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral approach to understanding obsessional thinking. British Journal of Psychiatry, 173(Suppl.), 53–63.Google Scholar
  48. Samuels, J., Nestadt, G., Bienvenu, O. J., Costa, P. T., Riddle, M. A., & Liang, K. (2000). Personality disorders and normal personality dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 457–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Steketee, G., & Frost, R. (2003). Compulsive hoarding: Current status of the research. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 905–927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Thornton, D. (1989). Self-esteem questionnaire. (Available from Dr. D. Thornton, Offending Behavioral Programmes Unit, UK Prison Service, Room 725, John Islip Street, London, SW1P 4LH, England.)Google Scholar
  51. Ward, T., Nathan, P., Drake, C.R., Lee, K.P., & Michele, P. (2000). The role of formulation-based treatment for sexual offenders. Behavior Change, 17, 251–264.Google Scholar
  52. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wegner, D. M., Shortt, J. W., Blake, A. W., & Page, M. S. (1990). The suppression of exciting thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 409–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wise, T. N., Fagan, P. J., Schmidt, C. W., Ponticas, Y., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). Personality and sexual functioning in transvestite fetishists and other paraphilics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 694–698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson, G. D., & Cox, D. N. (1983). Personality of paedophile club members. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 323–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.East Midlands Centre for Forensic Mental HealthLeicesterUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations