Abstract
National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of Republic of China (Taiwan) launched a program named the Columbus Program in 2017 for university professors younger than thirty-five (extended to thirty-eight one year later) to apply for research grant to explore the unknown. People are curious about how the eligible age thirty-eight was determined. To discuss whether this age is reasonable, this paper investigates the most productive age of scholars in academic institutions in Taiwan, focusing on the field of management. The productivity is represented by the number of papers published in scientific journals. Based on a sample of 4,413 management scholars, the most productive age is found to appear at forty, which is close to thirty-eight, the eligible age stipulated by NSTC. Female scholars publish twenty-three percent less of papers per person than male scholars and scholars of private institutions publish thirty-six percent less of papers than scholars of public institutions. However, their most productive ages are similar. The results also show that scholars of older generations have lower productivity and their most productive age appears later than that of younger generations. An average productivity analysis is also conducted. The results show that management scholars develop their research capability in the first twenty years of their career life, and the capability remains at a similar level until they retire.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2014). How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 101(2), 1129–1144.
Baffes, J., & Vamvakidis, A. (2011). Are you too young for the nobel prize? Research Policy, 40, 1345–1353.
Bayer, A. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1977). Career age and research-professional activities of academic scientists. Journal of Higher Education, 48(3), 259–282.
Bjork, R. (2019). The age at which Nobel Prize research is conducted. Scientometrics, 119(2), 931–939.
Bonaccorsi, A., & Secondi, L. (2017). The determinants of research performance in European universities: A large scale multilevel analysis. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1147–1178.
Boring, P. (2021). The relationship between firm productivity, wage level and employees’ age: A sectoral perspective. Economist-Netherlands, 169(3), 367–404.
Borsch-Supan, A., Hunkler, C., & Weiss, M. (2021). Big data at work: Age and labor productivity in the service sector. Journal of the Economics of Aging, 19, 319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2021.100319
Brodetsky, S. (1942). Newton: Scientist and man. Nature, 150, 698–699.
Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific performance. American Journal of Sociology, 84(4), 958–977.
Daniel, W. W. (1978). Applied Nonparametric Statistics. Houghton Mifflin.
Dennis, W. (1956). Age and productivity among scientists. Science, 123(3200), 724–725.
Duffy, R. D., Jadidian, A., Webster, G. D., & Sandell, K. J. (2011). The research productivity of academic psychologists: Assessment, trends, and best practice recommendations. Scientometrics, 89(1), 207–227.
Ferguson, C. E., & Gould, J. P. (1980). Microeconomic Theory (5th ed.). Irwin.
Frandsen, T. F., Jacobsen, R. H., & Ousager, J. (2020). Gender gaps in scientific performance: A longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers. Scientometrics, 124(2), 1511–1527.
Gupta, B. M., Kumar, S., & Aggarwal, B. S. (1999). A comparison of productivity of male and female scientists of CSIR. Scientometrics, 45(2), 269–289.
Jones, B. F. (2010). Age and great invention. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1), 1–14.
Kao, C., & Pao, H. L. (2009). An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities. Scientometrics, 78(2), 261–277.
Lariviere, V., Vignola-Gagne, E., Villeneuve, C., Gelinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: An analysis of Quebec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3), 483–498.
Lehman, H. C. (1958). The chemist’s most creative years. Science, 127(3308), 1213–1222.
Lehman, H. C. (1966). The psychologist’s most creative years. American Psychologist, 21(4), 363–369.
Mauleon, E., & Bordons, M. (2006). Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of Materials Science. Scientometrics, 66(1), 199–218.
O’Sullivan, A., & Sheffrin, S. M. (2003). Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River. Pearson Prentic Hall.
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2015). Within- and between-department variability in individual productivity: The case of economics. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1497–1520.
Popovych, O. S., Vashulenko, S. J., & Kostritsia, O. P. (2021). Changes in the age of maximum productivity of researchers in the 21st century. Science and Innovation, 17(6), 41–49.
Puuska, H. M. (2010). Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types: Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics, 82(2), 419–437.
Roosaar, L., Masso, J., & Varblane, U. (2019). Age-related productivity decrease in high-waged and low-waged employees. International Journal of Manpower, 40(6), 1151–1170.
Savage, W. E., & Olejniczak, A. J. (2021). Do senior faculty produce fewer research publications than their younger colleagues? Evidence from Ph.D. granting institutions in the United States. Scientometrics, 126(6), 4659–4686.
Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1993). Age and the nobel prize revisited. Scientometrics, 28(3), 387–399.
Sugimoto, C. R., Sugimoto, T. J., Tsou, A., Milojevic, S., & Lariviere, V. (2016). Age stratification and cohort effects in scholarly communication: A study of social sciences. Scientometrics, 109(2), 997–1016.
Tang, H. M., & MacLeod, C. (2006). Labour force aging and productivity performance in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique, 39(2), 582–603.
Torrisi, B. (2014). A multidimensional approach to academic productivity. Scientometrics, 99(3), 755–783.
Van Heeringen, A., & Dijkwel, P. A. (1987). The relationships between age, mobility and scientific productivity. part II: Effect of age on productivity. Scientometrics, 11(5–6), 281–293.
Yair, G., & Goldstein, K. (2020). The Annus Mirabilis paper: Years of peak productivity in scientific careers. Scientometrics, 124(2), 887–902.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the constructive comments of the two anonymous reviewers, and also acknowledge the financial support of the National Science and Technology Council of Republic of China (Taiwan), under grant MOST111-2410-H-006-042-MY3.
Funding
This work was funded by National Science and Technology Council (Grand No.: MOST111-2410-H-006-042-MY3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kao, C., Pao, HL. The most productive age of the management scholars in Taiwan. Scientometrics 128, 6719–6738 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04866-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04866-4