Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Letter: Response to Torres-Salinas et al. on “bibliometric denialism”

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Rushforth, A. & Hammarfelt, B. (2023). The rise of ‘responsible metrics’ as a professional reform movement: A collective action frames account. SocArXiv.

  • Sivertsen, G. & Rushforth, A. (2022). The new European reform of research assessment. R-QUEST Policy. Brief no. 7.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CWTS, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

    Alex Rushforth

Authors
  1. Alex Rushforth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Rushforth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has collaborated with DORA’s program management team and steering committee chair on Project TARA (Tools to Advance Research Assessment), funded by Arcadia, 2021–2024.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rushforth, A. Letter: Response to Torres-Salinas et al. on “bibliometric denialism”. Scientometrics 128, 6781–6784 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04842-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04842-y

Search

Navigation