Abstract
Corporations face complex and interesting trade-offs when choosing to publish their papers. Unlike previous studies focusing on corporate publications in the natural sciences, this study focuses for the first time on the business field, exploring the relationship of corporate involvement on publications. We define the top business journals using the FT 50 journal list and collect the bibliographic records of these journals from the Scopus database for the years 2000 through 2019, manually screening them to identify 1599 corporate publications and a 1:2 control group. Our results show that the number of corporate publications has tended to decrease year by year and that publications with corporate involvement receive fewer citation and view counts than non-corporate publications. Further, we analyse a subsample of corporate publications and find that corporate publications with university (especially top university) collaboration have higher citation and view counts than other corporate publications. The inverse U-shaped relationship is seen between the number of universities and the citation and view counts. Our study provides evidence of the negative relationship between corporate involvement and citation and view counts for publications in the business field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It should be noted that if the corporate publication to non-corporate publication sample is out of proportion, most of the samples at the one end of the citation count and view count distributions may affect the true effect values. Therefore, a control group is necessary.
In particular, the maximum number of corporations in this study is only 10, and 99% of the articles have less than 3 corporations participating.
References
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011). Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.004
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009). University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.003
Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Patacconi, A. (2018). The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2693
Arora, A., Belenzon, S., & Sheer, L. (2021). Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. American Economic Review, 111(3), 871–898. https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.20171742
Arora, A., Cohen, W. M., & Walsh, J. P. (2016). The acquisition and commercialization of invention in American manufacturing: Incidence and impact. Research Policy, 45(6), 1113–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.005
Ascarza, E., Ebbes, P., Netzer, O., & Danielson, M. (2017). Beyond the target customer: Social effects of customer relationship management campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0442
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z
Bergenholtz, C. (2014). Second-hand signals: How and why firms are being referenced in scientific publications. European Management Review, 11(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12028
Bhaskarabhatla, A., & Hegde, D. (2014). An organizational perspective on patenting and open innovation. Organization Science, 25(6), 1744–1763. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0911
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Scientometrics in a changing research landscape. EMBO Reports, 15(12), 1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439608
Collins, F. L., & Park, G. S. (2016). Ranking and the multiplication of reputation: Reflections from the frontier of globalizing higher education. Higher Education, 72(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9941-3
Daniel, S. L., Maruping, L. M., Cataldo, M., & Herbsleb, J. (2018). The impact of ideology misfit on open source software communities and companies. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 42(4), 1069–1096. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2018/14242
Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
Deeds, D. L., & Hill, C. W. L. (1996). Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00087-9
Ding, W. W. (2011). The impact of founders’ professional-education background on the adoption of open science by for-profit biotechnology firms. Management Science, 57(2), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1278
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
Fassin, Y. (2021). Does the financial times FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals? Scientometrics, 126(7), 5911–5943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03988-x
Feller, I. (1990). Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can. Research Policy, 19(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90017-Z
Fountain, T., McCarthy, B., & Saleh, T. (2019). Building the AI-Powered organization technology isn’t the biggest challenge Culture is. Harvard Business Review, 97(4), 62.
George, G., Zahra, S. A., & Wood, D. R. (2002). The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6
Germonprez, M., Kendall, J. E., Kendall, K. E., Mathiassen, L., Young, B., & Warner, B. (2017). A theory of responsive design: A field study of corporate engagement with open source communities. Information Systems Research, 28(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0662
Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.4.366.14420
Godin, B. (1996). Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy, 25(4), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00859-4
Hanssen, T.-E.S., & Jørgensen, F. (2015). The value of experience in research. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.003
Hicks, D., Ishizuka, T., Keen, P., & Sweet, S. (1994). Japanese corporations, scientific research and globalization. Research Policy, 23(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90002-7
Hoisl, K., Stelzer, T., & Biala, S. (2015). Forecasting technological discontinuities in the ICT industry. Research Policy, 44(2), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.004
Hou, L., Wu, Q., & Xie, Y. (2022). Does early publishing in top journals really predict long-term scientific success in the business field? Scientometrics, 127(11), 6083–6107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04509-0
Huang, K. G. L. (2017). Uncertain intellectual property conditions and knowledge appropriation strategies: Evidence from the genomics industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(1), 41–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw015
Kousha, K. (2019). Web citation indicators for wider impact assessment of articles. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer.
Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., & Cantu-Ortiz, F. J. (2021). Quantifying the publication preferences of leading research universities. Scientometrics, 126(3), 2269–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03790-1
Li, Y., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2015). Why do technology firms publish scientific papers? The strategic use of science by small and midsize enterprises in nanotechnology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(6), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9391-6
Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00569.x
McKelvey, M., & Rake, B. (2020). Exploring scientific publications by firms: What are the roles of academic and corporate partners for publications in high reputation or high impact journals? Scientometrics, 122(3), 1323–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03344-5
McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. L. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00030-X
Mckelvey, M., & Rake, B. (2016). Product innovation success based on cancer research in the pharmaceutical industry: Co-publication networks and the effects of partners. Industry and Innovation, 23, 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1150157
Motohashi, K. (2020). Science and Technology Co-evolution in AI: Empirical Understanding through a Linked Dataset of Scientific Articles and Patents. https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/20010.html.
Nelson, R. R. (1959). The Simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306.
Orduña-Malea, E. (2020). Do Latin American universities engage industry in the scientific publication? A bibliometrics approach through Scopus. Palabra Clave, 10(1), e100. https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e100
Pellens, M., & Della Malva, A. (2017). Corporate science, firm value, and vertical specialization: Evidence from the semiconductor industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(3), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtx040
Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.
Pohl, H. (2021). Internationalisation, innovation, and academic–corporate co-publications. Scientometrics, 126(2), 1329–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03799-6
Polidoro, F., Jr., & Theeke, M. (2012). Getting competition down to a science: The effects of technological competition on firms’ scientific publications. Organization Science, 23(4), 1135–1153. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0684
Qiu, Y., Gopal, A., & Hann, I.-H. (2017). Logic pluralism in mobile platform ecosystems: A study of indie app developers on the iOS app store. Information Systems Research, 28(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0664
Rafols, I., Hopkins, M. M., Hoekman, J., Siepel, J., O’Hare, A., Perianes-Rodríguez, A., & Nightingale, P. (2014). Big Pharma, little science? a bibliometric perspective on big pharma’s R&D decline. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.06.007
Rake, B. (2019). Do publication activities of academic institutions benefit from formal collaborations with firms? Innovation, 23, 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1679024
Rake, B. (2021). Do publication activities of academic institutions benefit from formal collaborations with firms? Innovation, 23(2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1679024
Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404
Rotolo, D., Camerani, R., Grassano, N., & Martin, B. R. (2022). Why do firms publish? A systematic literature review and a conceptual framework. Research Policy, 51(10), 104606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104606
Sakr, S., & Alomari, M. (2011). A decade of database research publications: A look inside. Scientometrics, 88(2), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0385-y
Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150505
Shneiderman, B. (2018). Twin-Win Model: A human-centered approach to research success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(50), 12590–12594. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802918115
Simeth, M., & Cincera, M. (2016). Corporate science, innovation, and firm value. Management Science, 62(7), 1970–1981. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2220
Simeth, M., & Lhuillery, S. (2015). How do firms develop capabilities for scientific disclosure? Research Policy, 44(7), 1283–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.005
Spence, M. (1974). Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Harvard University Press.
Spencer, J. W. (2001). How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States-Japan comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 432–440. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069465
Sull, D., Homkes, R., & Sull, C. (2015). Why strategy execution unravels-and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review, 93(3), 58–66.
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Abdoli, M., Stuart, E., Makita, M., Wilson, P., & Levitt, J. (2023). Do altmetric scores reflect article quality? Evidence from the UK research excellence framework 2021. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24751
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2004). Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy, 33(5), 709–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.002
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2012). Co-authored research publications and strategic analysis of public–private collaboration. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs013
Tijssen, R., van de Klippe, W., & Yegros, A. (2020). Localization, regionalization and globalization of university-business research co-operation in the United Kingdom. Papers in Regional Science, 99(5), 1215–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12531
Tu, J. (2019). What connections lead to good scientific performance? Scientometrics, 118(2), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-02997-7
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
Yu, N., Dong, Y., & de Jong, M. (2022). A helping hand from the government? How public research funding affects academic output in less-prestigious universities in China. Research Policy, 51(10), 104591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104591
Zahringer, K., Kolympiris, C., & Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2017). Academic knowledge quality differentials and the quality of firm innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(5), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw050
Zong, Q., Xie, Y., Tuo, R., Huang, J., & Yang, Y. (2019). The impact of video abstract on citation counts: Evidence from a retrospective cohort study of new journal of physics. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1715–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03108-w
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the paper.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71874173), and the Featured Social Science Fund of USTC (FSSF-A-230204).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, R., Wu, Q. & Xie, Y. Are scientific articles involving corporations associated with higher citations and views? an analysis of the top journals in business research. Scientometrics 128, 5659–5685 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04808-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04808-0