Abstract
The governance of emerging technologies has become a topic of global concern, not only for national competitiveness, but also for national security. Among other technologies, synthetic biology (SynBio) has been prioritized in the policy agenda of many countries; China is no exception. Unfortunately, despite the interconnectedness of governance practices and research development, few studies have investigated the current situation and development trajectory of this emerging dual use technology. To fill in this gap, this study focuses on China and investigates the pattern and evolution of its SynBio and related biosafety and biosecurity research published in both domestic and international databases. We find that despite its late entrance to the field, national government funding plays a critical role in China’s SynBio research. However, the funding ratio of SynBio as well as SynBio safety research is lower than China’s average when considering all fields. The structural topic model analysis reveals that the biological sciences dominate China’s SynBio research and slowly diffuse to other disciplines such as materials science, physics, and medicine, while perspectives from Chinese social scientists are barely recorded on the international academic stage. We also find little overlap of topics between China’s domestic and international output on SynBio and its safety research. Speculations and policy implications are discussed in the end.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Safety and security in this context often refer to the unique concerns incurred by synthetic biology. For example, Ahteensuu (2017) noted that SynBio safety mainly concerns “research personnel working with synthetic organisms and potential damage to the environment and population surrounding the research area,” while SynBio security is often related to the potential misuses of this technology, such as bioterrorism, biowarfare, or bioattacks (Gomez-Tatay and Hernandez-Andreu, 2019). In this paper, for the sake of brevity, we use the term SynBio safety to refer to both safety and security in the field.
CNKI publications were downloaded in May 2020 and updated in October 2022. The WoS publications were downloaded in June 2022. The publication coverage of our sample in both databases is from 1981 to 2020.
For example, after consulting synthetic biologists and scholars who have conducted research on safety and security issues of synthetic biology, we added “engineering biology*” into the search terms. For detailed search queries of synthetic biology and SynBio safety research, please refer to the Appendices section.
For the sake of brevity, we do not report the diagnostic process of selecting the number of topics for China’s domestic publications in the second phase of 2011–2020 and for the research published in international journals. This process is available upon the request; please contact the first author or corresponding author.
The selection process of topic numbers for Chinese SynBio safety publications in domestic and international databases are available upon request to the first author or corresponding author.
We speculate there are two reasons for why topics published within China differ from those published in international journals. One explanation could be that Chinese SynBio scientists who published in domestic and international journals are different sets of scholars. To test this hypothesis, we retrieved the names and spellings of all first authors in our dataset. We found the overlapping authors between Chinese domestic publications and international publications were only 4.51% for SynBio and 0.84% for SynBio safety over the examined 40 years. The second explanation relates to journal self-selection. Using SynBio safety research as an example, it is reasonable to believe that journals’ different preferences contribute to the disparate topics shown in Figs. 5 and 7. To examine this argument, we first selected the top five CNKI- and WoS-indexed journals by the number of Synbio safety publications from our analyzing dataset. We next retrieved and identified, collectively, their top keywords (authors) in the entire dataset over the examined period between 1980 and 2020. As presented in Appendix 3, the two groups of journals demonstrate distinct pattern of themes.
These three committees are the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER), the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR), and the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS).
References
Ahteensuu, M. (2017). Synthetic biology, genome editing, and the risk of bioterrorism. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(6), 1541–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9868-9
Albert, Z. (2020). Partisan policymaking in the extended party network: The case of cap-and-trade regulations. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 476–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919838326
Bai, X. W., Zhang, X. N., Li, K. X., Zhou, Y. M., & Yuen, K. F. (2021). Research topics and trends in the maritime transport: A structural topic model. Transport Policy, 102, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.013
Blaydes, L., Grimmer, J., & McQueen, A. (2018). Mirrors for princes and sultans: Advice on the art of governance in the medieval Christian and Islamic worlds. Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1086/699246
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4–5), 993–1022. https://doi.org/10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993
Brooks, S. M., & Alper, H. S. (2021). Applications, challenges, and needs for employing synthetic biology beyond the lab. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21740-0
Bueso, Y. F., & Tangney, M. (2017). Synthetic biology in the driving seat of the bioeconomy. Trends in Biotechnology, 35(5), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.02.002
Cheng, A. A., & Lu, T. K. (2012). Synthetic Biology: An Emerging Engineering Discipline. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150118
Commission, E. (2014). Opinion on synthetic biology I. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_044.pdf
Cummings, C., & Kuzma, J. (2017). Societal risk evaluation scheme (SRES): Scenario-based multi-criteria evaluation of synthetic biology applications. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0168564.
Curry, T. A., & Fix, M. P. (2019). May it please the twitterverse: The use of Twitter by state high court judges. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1657048
Forge, J. (2010). A note on the definition of “dual use.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(1), 111–118.
Gomez-Tatay, L., & Hernandez-Andreu, J. M. (2019). Biosafety and biosecurity in synthetic biology: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 49(17), 1587–1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1579628
Grajzl, P., & Murrell, P. (2019). Toward understanding 17th century English culture: A structural topic model of Francis Bacon’s ideas. Journal of Comparative Economics, 47(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2018.10.004
Greely, H. T. (2022). Governing emerging technologies—looking forward with horizon scanning and looking back with technology audits. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(3), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00045-y
Grey, A., Avenell, A., & Bolland, M. (2022). Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance, 29(6), 347–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1920409
Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding “anticipatory governance.” Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669
Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
Hu, X., & Rousseau, R. (2015). From a word to a world: The current situation in the interdisciplinary field of synthetic biology. PeerJ, 3, e728.
Khalil, A. S., & Collins, J. J. (2010). Synthetic biology: Applications come of age. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(5), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2775
Krimsky, S. (2019). Ten ways in which He Jiankui violated ethics. Nature Biotechnology, 37(1), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4337
Kuzma, J. (2022). Implementing responsible research and innovation: a case study of US biotechnology oversight. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00046-x
Kuzma, J., Palmer, M. J., & Relman, D. A. (2017). Rethinking biosecurity. Issues in Science and Technology, 33(2), 11–15.
Kuzma, J., & Tanji, T. (2010). Unpacking synthetic biology for oversight policy. Regulation & Governance, 4, 92–112.
Liu, W. S., Tang, L., & Hu, G. Y. (2020). Funding information in web of science: An updated overview. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1509–1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03362-3
Moritz, R. L., Berger, K. M., Owen, B. R., & Gillum, D. R. (2020). Promoting biosecurity by professionalizing biosecurity A credential system could improve policy and practice. Science, 367(6480), 856–858. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba0376
Oldham, P., Hall, S., & Burton, G. (2012). Synthetic biology: Mapping the scientific landscape. PLoS ONE, 7(4), e34368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034368
Paul-Hus, A., Desrochers, N., & Costas, R. (2016). Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science. Scientometrics, 108(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1953-y
Perkins, D., Danskin, K., Rowe, A. E., & Livinski, A. A. (2019). The culture of biosafety, biosecurity, and responsible conduct in the life sciences: A comprehensive literature review. Applied Biosafety, 24(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676018778538
Raimbault, B., Cointet, J. P., & Joly, P. B. (2016). Mapping the emergence of synthetic biology. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0161522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161522
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., Albertson, B., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103
Schwemmer, C. (2018). stminsights: A shiny application for inspecting structural topic models.
Shapira, P., Kwon, S., & Youtie, J. (2017). Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1439–1469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2452-5
Shapira, P., Matthews, N. E., Cizauskas, C. A., Aurand, E. R., Friedman, D. C., et al. (2022). Building a bottom-up bioeconomy. Issues in Science and Technology, 38(3), 78–83.
Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2010). Follow the money. Nature, 468(7324), 627–628. https://doi.org/10.1038/468627a
Sharma, A., Rana, N. P., & Nunkoo, R. (2021). Fifty years of information management research: A conceptual structure analysis using structural topic modeling. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102316
SynbiCITE. (2020). Standards and metrology in synthetic biology. http://www.synbicite.com/collaboration/standards-and-metrology/
Tang, L. (2022a). Global impact and the power of academic discourse of Chinese social science research: Status Quo, theoretical framework and prospectus. Science of Science and Management of S&t, 43(05), 3–17.
Tang, L. (2022b). A role for funders in fostering China’s research integrity. Science, 375(6584), 979–981. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm7992
Tang, L., & Cao, C. (2022). Special issue on “Global governance of emerging technologies: Prospects and challenges.” Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(3), 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00050-1
Tang, L., Hu, G. Y., & Liu, W. S. (2017). Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 790–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23713
Tang, T. C., An, B. L., Huang, Y. Y., Vasikaran, S., et al. (2021). Materials design by synthetic biology. Nature Reviews Materials, 6(4), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00265-w
Trump, B. D., Cegan, J., Wells, E., Poinsatte-Jones, K., Rycroft, T., Warner, C., et al. (2019). Co-evolution of physical and social sciences in synthetic biology. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 39(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2019.1566203
Trump, B., Cummings, C., Kuzma, J., & Linkov, I. (2018). A decision analytic model to guide early-stage government regulatory action: Applications for synthetic biology. Regulation and Governance, 12, 88–100.
Trump, B., Cummings, C., Kuzma, J., & Linkov, I. (Eds.). (2020b). Synthetic biology 2020: Frontiers in risk analysis and governance. Springer.
Trump, B. D., Galaitsi, S. E., Appleton, E., Bleijs, D. A., Florin, M. V., Gollihar, J. D., et al. (2020a). Building biosecurity for synthetic biology. Molecular Systems Biology, 16(7), e9723. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20209723
Union, E. (2020). The synenergene approach. https://www.synenergene.eu/information/what-synenergene.html
Valdez, R. X., Kuzma, J., Cummings, C., & Peterson, N. (2019). Anticipating risks, governance needs, and public perceptions of de-extinction. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(2), 211–231.
Voigt, C. A. (2020). Synthetic biology 2020–2030: six commercially-available products that are changing our world. Nature Communications, 11(1), 6379. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20122-2
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Synthetic Biology Biosafety Research project under the National Key Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2020YFA0908600). We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding agencies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Appendices
Appendix 1
Search queries of synthetic biology research in Web of Science
(((TS = (“synthetic biolog*” OR “engineering biolog*” OR “synthetic dna” OR “synthetic genom*” OR “synthetic *nucleotide” OR “synthetic promoter” OR “synthetic gene* cluster”) NOT TS = (“photosynthe*”)) OR (TS = (“synthetic mammalian gene*” AND “mammalian cell”) NOT TS = “photosynthe*”) OR (TS = “synthetic gene*” NOT TS = (“synthetic gener*” OR “photosynthe*”)) OR (TS = (“artificial gene* network” OR (“artificial gene* circuit*” AND “biological system”)) NOT TS = “gener*”) OR (TS = (“artificial cell”) NOT TS = (“cell* telephone” OR “cell* phone” OR “cell* culture” OR “logic cell*” OR “fuel cell*” OR “battery cell*” OR “load-cell*” OR “geo-synthetic cell*” OR “memory cell*” OR “cellular network” OR “ram cell*” OR “rom cell*” OR “maximum cell*” OR “electrochemical cell*” OR “solar cell*”)) OR (TS = (“synthetic cell”) NOT TS = (“cell* telephone” OR “cell* phone” OR “cell* culture” OR “logic cell*” OR “fuel cell*” OR “battery cell*” OR “load-cell*” OR “geo-synthetic cell*” OR “memory cell*” OR “cellular network” OR “ram cell*” OR “rom cell*” OR “maximum cell*” OR “electrochemical cell*” OR “solar cell*” OR “photosynthe*”)) OR (TS = (“artificial nucleic acid*” OR “artificial *nucleotide”)) OR (TS = (“bio brick” OR “biobrick” OR “bio-brick”)))).
Appendix 2
Search queries of SynBio safety research in Web of Science
(((TS = (“synthetic biolog*” OR “engineering biolog*” OR “synthetic dna” OR “synthetic genom*” OR “synthetic *nucleotide” OR “synthetic promoter” OR “synthetic gene* cluster”) NOT TS = (“photosynthe*”)) OR (TS = (“synthetic mammalian gene*” AND “mammalian cell”) NOT TS = “photosynthe*”) OR (TS = “synthetic gene*” NOT TS = (“synthetic gener*” OR “photosynthe*”)) OR (TS = (“artificial gene* network” OR (“artificial gene* circuit*” AND “biological system”)) NOT TS = “gener*”) OR (TS = (“artificial cell”) NOT TS = (“cell* telephone” OR “cell* phone” OR “cell* culture” OR “logic cell*” OR “fuel cell*” OR “battery cell*” OR “load-cell*” OR “geo-synthetic cell*” OR “memory cell*” OR “cellular network” OR “ram cell*” OR “rom cell*” OR “maximum cell*” OR “electrochemical cell*” OR “solar cell*”)) OR (TS = (“synthetic cell”) NOT TS = (“cell* telephone” OR “cell* phone” OR “cell* culture” OR “logic cell*” OR “fuel cell*” OR “battery cell*” OR “load-cell*” OR “geo-synthetic cell*” OR “memory cell*” OR “cellular network” OR “ram cell*” OR “rom cell*” OR “maximum cell*” OR “electrochemical cell*” OR “solar cell*” OR “photosynthe*”)) OR (TS = (“artificial nucleic acid*” OR “artificial *nucleotide”)) OR (TS = (“bio brick” OR “biobrick” OR “bio-brick”)))) AND ((TS = (“biosafe*” OR “biosecurit” OR “safe*” OR “securit*” OR “risk*” OR “biorisk*” OR “harm*” OR “hazard*” OR “danger*” OR “virulence” OR “toxic*” OR “terror*” OR “bioterror” OR “DURC” OR “dual use” OR “dual-use”)) OR (TS = (“biocontainment” OR “containment” OR “kill switch*”)) OR (TS = (“governance*” OR “government” OR “polic*” OR “law*” OR “legal*” OR “defense*” OR “biodefense” OR “prevent*” OR “precaution*” OR “responsible innovation” OR “responsible research and innovation” OR “responsible research*”) OR (TS = (“regulation”) NOT TS = (“cell regulat*” OR “gene regulat*” OR “gene-regulat*” OR “regulat* of gene*” OR “regulat* of cell*” OR “regulat* of protein” OR “regulat* network*” OR “regulatory element*” OR “regulatory pathway*” OR “regulatory genetic network*” OR “nucleic acids regulatory device*” OR “complex regulatory” OR “regulatory circuit*” OR “regulatory level” OR “regulatory mechanisms” OR “chromatin regulation” OR “regulatory parts” OR “metabolic regulation” OR “regulatory system*”))) OR TS = (“ethic*”)).
Appendix 3
Top research foci of SynBio journals: 1980–2020
CNKI | WoS |
---|---|
Escherichia coli | Mycobacterium Tuberculosis & Leprosy |
DNA | Micrornas |
Biotechnology | Hiv Prevalence & Prophylaxis |
Genetic engineering | Lactic acid bacteria |
DBA | Type strain |
PCR | Biodegradation |
Pichia pastoris | Gut microbiota |
RNA | Influenza |
Monoclonal antibody | Malaria |
Prokaryotic expression | Hiv-1 |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, L., Kuzma, J., Zhang, X. et al. Synthetic biology and governance research in China: a 40-year evolution. Scientometrics 128, 5293–5310 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04789-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04789-0