Abstract
In response to a letter by Ansorge, who questioned whether authors or science need the right not to want to be cited, we fully respect his opinion and choice to express that he believes that such a right is not needed. However, we counter that argument by noting that, even in the absence of concrete examples, to have a solid theoretical basis for arguing a right is essential, even if it is not always welcomed, or appreciated by all, or even many. The ability to have an equal right on any two sides of any argument or situation, including those related to the right to cite a paper, or to not cite a paper, or even to be cited, or to not want to be cited, is a fundamental right that we advocated for in our initial letter, and which we fortify in this follow-up letter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Ansorge, L. (2023). The right to reject an unwanted citations [sic]: do we need it? Scientometrics (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04702-9
Breeding, T., & Elkbuli, A. (2022). Origins and implications of proper citation practices on academic integrity in surgical literature. Surgery, 172(6), 1873–1874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.033
Daly, T. (2023). The letter as a forum to embed ethics into the scientific literature. Accountability in Research (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2171791
Dumas-Mallet, E., & Gonon, F. (2022). Citation misuses in the biomedical literature and its effects on public health. In J. Faintuch & S. Faintuch (Eds.), Integrity of scientific research (pp. 417–426). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_42
Goe, L. C., Herrera, A. M., & Mower, W. R. (1998). Misrepresentation of research citations among medical school faculty applicants. Academic Medicine, 73(11), 1183–1186. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199811000-00017
Gøtzsche, P. C. (2022). Citation bias: Questionable research practice or scientific misconduct? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 115(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768221075881
Ray, K. S., Zurn, P., Dworkin, J. D., Bassett, D. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2022). Citation bias, diversity, and ethics. Accountability in Research (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Kendall, G. (2023). Academia should stop using Beall’s Lists and review their use in previous studies. Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics, 4(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2023.4.1.04
Urlings, M. J. E., Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M. H., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2021). Citation bias and other determinants of citation in biomedical research: Findings from six citation networks. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 132, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.019
West, R., Stenius, K., & Kettunen, T. (2017). Use and abuse of citations. In T. F. Babor, K. Stenius, R. Pates, M. Miovský, J. O’Reilly, & P. Candon (Eds.), Publishing addiction science: A guide for the perplexed (pp. 191–205). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbd.j
Funding
This research was not funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest relevant to this topic.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Vuong, QH. Who, if anyone, has the right to accept or refuse unwanted citations?. Scientometrics 128, 4151–4154 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04732-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04732-3