Skip to main content
Log in

Is the research performance of Chinese returnees better than that of their local counterparts?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the Chinese government has issued several policies to attract overseas elites to return to China and has given them privileges in academic resource allocation. This particular treatment has provoked complaints from domestic scientists who have received no additional resources. Therefore, the research performance of returnees and their local counterparts has been widely debated. We selected 4,770 returnees and their local counterparts in the same departments of the same institutions in the same year from 1984 to 2017, and compared their research performance using regression analysis. The results show that returnees have no significant advantage in publishing more papers or first-tier journal papers, but more returnees are corresponding authors in Natural Sciences. In addition, in Arts & Humanities and Social Sciences, returnees still have an advantage in publishing more papers and in more first-tier journal papers. This study has implications for the employment policies of Chinese universities/research institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Source: Interviews with CAS scientists, 2002 and 2004 (N = 86).

References

  • Ai, B. (2019). Pains and gains of working in Chinese universities: An academic returnee’s journey. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 661–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akers, K. G., Sarkozy, A., Wu, W., & Slyman, A. (2016). ORCID author identifiers: A primer for librarians. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(2), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barjak, F., & Robinson, S. (2007). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: Impact on research performance. In D. TorresSalinas & H. F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of Issi 2007: 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vols I and Ii (pp. 63). Int Soc Scientometrics & Informetrics-Issi

  • Baruffaldi, S. H., & Landoni, P. (2012). Return mobility and scientific productivity of researchers working abroad: The role of home country linkages. Research Policy, 41(9), 1655–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bess, J. (1978). Anticipatory socialization of graduate students. Research in Higher Education, 8(4), 289–317.

  • Bohannon, J., & Doran, K. (2017). Introducing ORCID. Science, 356(6339), 691–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, P., Flanagan, K., Gagliardi, D., Kaloudis, A., & Karakasidou, A. (2015). International mobility: Findings from a survey of researchers in the EU. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 811–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, C. (2004). China’s efforts at turning ‘Brian Drain’ into ‘Brain gain.’ National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, C., Baas, J., Wagner, C. S., & Jonkers, K. (2020). Returning scientists and the emergence of China’s science system. Science and Public Policy, 47(2), 172–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. (2022). ‘Why should a “foreigner” be better than me?’: Preferential practices in junior academic faculty recruitment among mainland Chinese universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 28(1), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, E. A., & Sabharwal, M. (2007). Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their US-born peers? Research in Higher Education, 48(8), 909–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decramer, A., Goeminne, S., & Smolders, C. (2013). The impact of internationalization on volume and quality of scholarly publication performance. Public Money & Management, 33(2), 111–117.

  • Enders, J. (2005). Border crossings: Research training, knowledge dissemination and the transformation of academic work. Higher Education, 49(1–2), 119–133.

  • Equeter, E., & Hellemans, C. (2016). Influence of international mobility on the attitudes of researchers. European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee, 66(2), 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaule, P. (2014). Who comes back and when? Return migration decisions of academic scientists. Economics Letters, 124(3), 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, J., & Welch, A. (2012). A tale of sea turtles: Job-seeking experiences of Hai Gui (High-Skilled Returnees) in China. Higher Education Policy, 25(2), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H. (2009). Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: Does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise? Higher Education, 58(5), 689–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (2022). International staff mobility. Research Handbook on Academic Careers and Managing Academics, 2022, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2004). Global estimates of high-level brain drain and deficit. Faseb Journal, 18(9), 936–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, H. (2018). What is China’s thousand talents plan? Nature, 553(7688), S8–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., & Shen, W. (2019). International mentorship and research collaboration: evidence from European-trained Chinese PhD returnees. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(2), 180–205.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B. H., & Rousseau, R. (2005). China’s quantitative expansion phase: Exponential growth but low impact. In P. Ingwersen & B. Larsen (Eds.), ISSI 2005: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Vols 1 and 2 (pp. 362–370). Karolinska Univ Press Ab.

  • Jonkers, K., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2013). Research upon return: The effect of international mobility on scientific ties, production and impact. Research Policy, 42(8), 1366–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, S., & MacGarvie, M. (2016). Do return requirements increase international knowledge diffusion? Evidence from the Fulbright program. Research Policy, 45(6), 1304–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakas, A. (2020). Disciplining transnationality? The impact of study abroad educational experiences on Turkish returnee scholars’ lives, careers and identity. Research in Comparative and International Education, 15(3), 252–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., & Tang, L. (2019). When international mobility meets local connections: Evidence from China. Science and Public Policy, 46(4), 518–529.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, 102(3), 1997–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, W., Gu, J., & Nyland, C. (2022). China’s new research evaluation policy: Evidence from economics faculty of Elite Chinese universities. Research Policy, 51(1), 104407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, M. A., He, R., & Chan, C. Y. (2022). Engagement with China from inside and out: Kindness and academic dialogue. International Journal of Chinese Education, 11(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X221149816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., & McInerney, P. B. (2016). Is it better to “Stand on Two Boats” or “Sit on the Chinese Lap”?: Examining the cultural contingency of network structures in the contemporary Chinese academic labor market. Research Policy, 45(10), 2125–2137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malarvizhi, R., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). Research trends in adsorption technologies for dye containing wastewaters. World Applied Sciences Journal, 8, 930–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, G., & Xu, X. (2023). Big fishes in a big pond: A comparison between foreign and Chinese academics’ research influence in Mainland China. International Journal of Chinese Education, 12(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini, G., & Yang, L. (2021). Globally bred Chinese talents returning home: an analysis of a reverse brain-drain flagship policy. Science and Public Policy, 48(4), 541–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G. (2004). Postdoc abroad: Inherited scientific contacts or establishment of new networks? Research Evaluation, 13(2), 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morano-Foadi, S. (2005). Scientific mobility, career progression, and excellence in the European research area. International Migration, 43(5), 133–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummolo, J., & Peterson, E. (2018). Improving the Interpretation of Fixed Effects Regression Results. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(4), 829–835.

  • National Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Graduate and international student data. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0M0D&sj=2021

  • Netz, N., Hampel, S., & Aman, V. (2020). What effects does international mobility have on scientists’ careers? A Systematic Review. Research Evaluation, 29(3), 327–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ORCID. (2022). ORCID. https://orcid.org/statistics

  • Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish an investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 486–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (2002). Brain circulation: How high-skill immigration makes everyone better off. Brookings Review, 20(1), 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, D., Liu, W., & Wang, Y. (2023). Has China’s young thousand talents program been successful in recruiting and nurturing top-caliber scientists? Science, 379(6627), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., Jung, J., Postiglione, G. A., & Azman, N. (2014). Research productivity of returnees from study abroad in Korea, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. Minerva, 52(4), 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., & Gan, Y. (2022). International mobility activities predict research output: a longitudinal study. Psych Journal, 11(2), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S. (2013). Acknowledging the first author and corresponding author of published work. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 78(5), 801–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. N. (2008). Problems and solutions for social science journals at Chinese universities. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39(4), 410–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., Wei, H., & Xu, F. (2015). Pharmacist-led nonpharmacological intervention in cancer chemotherapy. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, G., Yue, Y., & Niu, M. (2015). An empirical study of faculty mobility in China. Higher Education, 69(4), 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Mittelmeier, J., Lomer, S., & Lim, M. (2022). Mismatched expectations of internationalisation: Lived experiences of Chinese returnee academics in an international joint university. International Journal of Chinese Education, 11(3), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. A., & Lucey, B. M. (2019). Globalisation, the mobility of skilled workers, and economic growth: constructing a novel brain drain/gain index for European countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(4), 1620–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Z., Bu, Y., Kang, L., Min, C., Bian, Y., Tang, L., & Li, J. (2020). An investigation of the relationship between scientists’ mobility to/from China and their research performance. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2), 101037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Z., Bu, Y., & Li, J. (2022). Does the mobility of scientists disrupt their collaboration stability? Journal of Information Science, 48(2), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glaenzel, W. (2009). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, D. (2006). Competing for talent: China’s strategies to reverse the brain drain. International Labour Review, 145(1–2), 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the constructive comments from Dr Chao Ma, Dr Lianghao Dai and anonymous reviewers. The manuscript is an extended version of our previous work, which was presented at the 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022) (Zhao et al., 2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author (Jiang Li) is a member of the Distinguished Reviewers Board of Scientometrics.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Wei, C. & Li, J. Is the research performance of Chinese returnees better than that of their local counterparts?. Scientometrics 128, 3091–3105 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04693-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04693-7

Keywords

Navigation