Abstract
The collapse of socialist Eastern Europe in 1989 deprived Cuba’s science system of its most important academic peers. To overcome this obstacle and increase its scientific productivity, Cuba drove scientific collaboration with countries in Europe and Latin America. This study explores the role of Cuban scientific collaboration with the U.S. in the absence of diplomatic relations between those countries. The results suggest that Mexico acts as a bridge for increasing scientific collaboration between Cuba and the U.S.—measured as the number of coauthored papers published in WoS and Scopus. When the number of papers co-authored by Cuban academics with their Mexican peers doubled, the number of articles coauthored by Cuban and U.S. scientists in Scopus grew 9.31 times \(2^{3.22}\) and 8.11 times \(2^{3.08}\). in WoS. The findings support the hypothesis that scientific collaboration favors an increase in the productivity and scientific visibility of countries. Furthermore, the results suggest that scientific collaboration helps to lay bridges between science systems in the absence of diplomatic relations and even in the presence of political and economic hostility between them. Strengthening international scientific collaboration makes it possible for the science systems of developing countries to overcome limitations on resources and carry out cutting-edge research, and also to incorporate their scientists in mainstream research in the areas that promote their technological-scientific development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arencibia-Jorge, R., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Vega-Almeida, R. L. (2017). Puentes científicos entre Cuba y los Estados Unidos. Revista Cubana De Información En Ciencias De La Salud, 28(2), 1–10.
Arencibia-Jorge, R., & de Moya-Anegon, F. (2010). Challenges in the study of Cuban scientific output. Scientometrics, 83(3), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0150-7
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bai, X., Zhang, F., Li, J., Xu, Z., Patoli, Z., & Lee, I. (2021). Quantifying scientific collaboration impact by exploiting collaboration-citation network. Scientometrics, 126(9), 7993–8008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04078-8
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
DeWeerdt, S. (2001). Embargoing science: US policy toward Cuba and scientific collaboration. BioScience, 51(8), 612–612. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0612:Esuptc]2.0.Co;2
Fink, G. R., Leshner, A. I., & Turekian, V. C. (2014). Science diplomacy with Cuba. Science, 344(6188), 1065. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256312
Fu, Y. C., Marques, M., Tseng, Y.-H., Powell, J. J. W., & Baker, D. P. (2022). An evolving international research collaboration network: Spatial and thematic developments in co-authored higher education research, 1998–2018. Scientometrics, 127(3), 1403–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04200-w
Gilderhus, M. T. (2008). Creating a third world: Mexico, Cuba, and the United States during the Castro era. The Americas, 65(1), 134–135. https://doi.org/10.1353/tam.0.0019
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guildford Press.
Kahn, M. (2018). Co-authorship as a proxy for collaboration: A cautionary tale. Science and Public Policy, 45(1), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx052
Katz, J. S., & Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2019). Cooperation, scale-invariance and complex innovation systems: A generalization. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1045–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03215-8
Lempinen, E. W. (2009). U.S. Science Delegation Completes Hopeful Three-Day Visit to Cuba. https://www.aaas.org/news/us-science-delegation-completes-hopeful-three-day-visit-cuba. Accessed 15 April 2021
McManus, C., Baeta Neves, A. A., Maranhão, A. Q., Souza Filho, A. G., & Santana, J. M. (2020). International collaboration in Brazilian science: Financing and impact. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03728-7
Palacios-Callender, M., & Roberts, S. A. (2018). Scientific collaboration of Cuban researchers working in Europe: Understanding relations between origin and destination countries. Scientometrics, 117(2), 745–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2888-2
Palacios-Callender, M., Roberts, S. A., & Roth-Berghofer, T. (2016). Evaluating patterns of national and international collaboration in Cuban science using bibliometric tools. Journal of Documentation, 72(2), 362–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-11-2014-0164
Pastrana, S. J. (2015). Science in U.S.-Cuba relations. Science, 348(6236), 735. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9542
Pastrana, S. J., & Clegg, M. T. (2008). U.S.-Cuban scientific relations. Science, 322(5900), 345. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162561
Reiss, M. J. (1989). The allometry of growth and reproduction. Cambridge University Press.
Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2021). Cuba—U.S. scientific collaboration: Beyond the embargo. Plos One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255106
Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2016). The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and international collaboration of Cuban articles in natural sciences. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1939-9
Shen, H., Xie, J., Li, J., & Cheng, Y. (2021). The correlation between scientific collaboration and citation count at the paper level: A meta-analysis. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3443–3470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03888-0
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco Jossey-Bass.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks four reviewers’ encouraging suggestions to a previous version of the manuscript.
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Appendix 1: The 25 Cuban and foreign institutions that appear most frequently in articles published by Cuba between 1990 and 2020 in WoS
Appendix 1: The 25 Cuban and foreign institutions that appear most frequently in articles published by Cuba between 1990 and 2020 in WoS
Rank | Affiliations | Affiliation country | Record count | % of 20.361 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | UNIVERSIDAD DE LA HABANA | Cuba | 4814 | 24% |
2 | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTONOMA DE MEXICO We thank reviewer 1 for his/her supporting words to our study | Mexico | 1243 | 6% |
3 | UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL MARTA ABREU DE LAS VILLAS | Cuba | 1200 | 6% |
4 | CENTRO DE INGENIERIA GENETICA Y BIOTECNOLOGIA | Cuba | 994 | 5% |
5 | UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO | Brazil | 891 | 4% |
6 | INST CIENCIA ANIM | Cuba | 851 | 4% |
7 | CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS CSIC | Spain | 838 | 4% |
8 | UDICE FRENCH RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES | France | 765 | 4% |
9 | CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE CNRS | France | 723 | 4% |
10 | UNIVERSIDAD DE ORIENTE SANTIAGO DE CUBA | Cuba | 720 | 4% |
11 | CINVESTAV CENTRO DE INVESTIGACION Y DE ESTUDIOS AVANZADOS DEL INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL | Mexico | 634 | 3% |
12 | INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL MEXICO | Mexico | 569 | 3% |
13 | UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS | Brazil | 513 | 3% |
14 | NATL CTR SCI RES | France | 487 | 2% |
15 | UNIVERSITE PARIS SACLAY | France | 477 | 2% |
16 | UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYSTEM | USA | 445 | 2% |
17 | HELMHOLTZ ASSOCIATION | Germany | 438 | 2% |
18 | RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES | Russia | 410 | 2% |
19 | ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE INFN | Italy | 405 | 2% |
20 | SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY ROME | Italy | 403 | 2% |
21 | BENEMERITA UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE PUEBLA | Mexico | 401 | 2% |
22 | UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM | USA | 401 | 2% |
23 | GOETHE UNIVERSITY FRANKFURT | Germany | 398 | 2% |
24 | UNIVERSITY OF OSLO | Norway | 396 | 2% |
25 | RUPRECHT KARLS UNIVERSITY HEIDELBERG | Germany | 389 | 2% |
TOTAL (WoS 1990–2020) | 20361 | 100% |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ronda-Pupo, G.A. Mexico: a bridge in Cuba–U.S. scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 128, 2301–2315 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04668-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04668-8