The systematic application of science plays a critical role in innovation, and universities are the largest source of scientific knowledge. This makes university knowledge transfer critical to the growth of knowledge-based economies. Academic entrepreneurship is a promising route for university knowledge spillover, and the creation of university spinoffs (USOs) has been supported by the national and local governments in Japan. Against a backdrop of recent findings suggesting that the quality of science signals growth potential of USOs, this study examines the relationship between the quality of scientific publications authored by university-based scientists affiliated with USOs and the probability of the firm owner intending the initial public offering. A national government’s USO database combined with Elsevier’s SciVal was analyzed. Estimated random-effects logistic regression models show that citation impact matters more than publication count. Meanwhile, field-weighted citation impact indicators do not exhibit significant effects. Moreover, comparison between USOs that exclusively aim to commercialize university patents and those defined by non-technological aspects emphasizes the heterogeneity in growth strategy among USOs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Indicators other than forward citations that positively affect firm value include technology cycle time and science linkage (Hirschey & Richardson, 2001), patent litigation (Nakanishi & Yamada, 2007), patent scope or diversity (Chen & Chang, 2010), patent family (Fischer & Leidinger, 2014), and a composite indicator comprising forward citations, backward citations, patent family, and claims (Lanjouw & Schankerman, 2004).
The mechanism through which science affects firm value may not be linear as assumed in this study. The moderating effect of entrepreneurial intermediaries (e.g., venture capitalists) on the relationship between the quality of science and USO performance has been examined in another paper (Fukugawa, 2022).
Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., & Celik, M. (2020). Radical and incremental innovation: The roles of firms, managers and innovators. Retrieved March 6, 2021, from https://muratcelik.faculty.economics.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CreativeInnovation_R1_AEJ_final.pdf
Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., & Lehmann, E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 757–774.
Chen, Y., & Chang, K. (2010). The relationship between a firm’s patent quality and its market value: The case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 20–33.
Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104–124.
Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2006). Intangible capital and economic growth (NBER Working Paper 11948). NBER Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2006(24), 1.
Fischer, T., & Leidinger, J. (2014). Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value: An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions. Research Policy, 43(3), 519–529.
Fukao, K., Makino, T., & Settsu, T. (2021). Human capital and economic growth in Japan: 1885–2015. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(3), 710–740.
Fukugawa, N. (2012). Impacts of intangible assets on the initial public offering of biotechnology startups. Economics Letters, 116(1), 83–85.
Fukugawa, N. (2018). Is the impact of incubator’s ability on incubation performance contingent on technologies and life cycle stages of startups? Evidence from Japan. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 457–478.
Fukugawa, N. (2021). Emergence and development of entrepreneurship and innovation intermediaries: The case of business incubators in Japan. In S. Mian (Ed.), Handbook of research on business & technology incubation and acceleration: A global perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Fukugawa, N. (2022). Effects of the quality of science and innovation on venture financing: Evidence from university spinoffs in Japan. Applied Economics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2094319
Goji, T., Hayashi, Y., & Sakata, I. (2020). Evaluating “startup readiness” for researchers: Case studies of research-based startups with biopharmaceutical research topics. Heliyon, 6(6), e04160.
Gubitta, P., Tognazzo, A., & Destro, F. (2016). Signaling in academic ventures: The role of technology transfer offices and university funds. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 368–393.
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.
Hellmann, T. (2007). When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Science, 53(6), 919–933.
Hellmann, T., & Thiele, V. (2011). Incentives and Innovation: A Multitasking Approach. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(1), 78–128.
Hirschey, M., & Richardson, V. (2001). Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and U.S. firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(1), 65–82.
Honjo, Y., & Nagaoka, S. (2018). Initial public offering and financing of biotechnology start-ups: Evidence from Japan. Research Policy, 47, 180–193.
Hu, X., Rousseau, R., & Chen, J. (2012). A new approach for measuring the value of patents based on structural indicators for ego patent citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(9), 1834–1842.
Kalantaridis, C., & Küttim, M. (2020). University ownership and information about the entrepreneurial opportunity in commercialisation: A systematic review and realist synthesis of the literature. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 1–27.
Lanjouw, J., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal, 114, 495.
Lee, Y., Lee, J., Song, Y., & Lee, S. (2007). An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model: The case of KIST. Scientometrics, 70(1), 27–39.
Maine, E., & Thomas, V. J. (2017). Raising financing through strategic timing. Nature Nanotechnology, 12(2), 93–98.
McManus, C., Neves, A., Maranhão, A., Filho, A., & Santana, J. (2020). International collaboration in Brazilian science: Financing and impact. Scientometrics, 125, 2745–2772.
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2019). University spinoff survey report. METI. Retrieved from https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/innovation_corp/start-ups/start-ups.html
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2020). University spinoff survey report. METI. Retrieved from https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/innovation_corp/start-ups/start-ups.html
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2022). University spinoff database. METI. Retrieved April 12, 2022, from https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/innovation_corp/univ-startupsdb.html.
Nakanishi, Y., & Yamada, S. (2007). Market value and patent quality in Japanese manufacturing firms (MPRA Paper 10285). University Library of Munich.
Park, G., & Park, Y. (2006). On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 793–812.
Pohl, H. (2021). Internationalisation, innovation, and academic–corporate co-publications. Scientometrics, 126, 1329–1358.
Purkayastha, A., Palmaro, E., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., & Baas, J. (2019). Comparison of two article-level field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR). Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.012.
Roche, M., Conti, A., & Rothaermel, F. (2020). Different founders, different venture outcomes: A comparative analysis of academic and non-academic startups. Research Policy, 49(10), 104062.
Serrano, C. & Ziedonis, R. (2018). How redeployable are patent assets? Evidence from failed startups (NBER Working Paper 24526). NBER.
Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: USOs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Steffensen, M., Rogers, E., & Speakman, K. (2000). Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 93–111.
Stephan, A. (2014). Are public research spin-offs more innovative? Small Business Economics, 43(2), 353–368.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Thomas, V., Bliemel, M., Shippam, C., & Maine, E. (2020). Endowing university spin-offs pre-formation: Entrepreneurial capabilities for scientist-entrepreneurs. Technovation, 96–97, 102153.
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.
Walsh, J., Baba, Y., Goto, A., & Yasaki, Y. (2008). Promoting university–industry linkages in Japan: Faculty responses to a changing policy environment. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 26(1), 39–54.
Zingales, L. (1995). Insider ownership and the decision to go public. Review of Economic Studies, 62(3), 425–448.
This paper is a product of the research project Developing an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, conducted at the Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry (RIETI). I thank the project members and participants in RIETI Discussion Paper Workshop and Innovation Economics Workshop for their comments on the draft. I particularly appreciate technical support by Shoji Takahashi (Elsevier). The usual caveats apply.
This study is financially supported by a grant-in-aid from the Nomura Foundation and another from the Zengin Foundation for Studies on Economics and Finance.
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflict of interest to declare.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: In the original publication of the article, the reference Fukugawa (2022) was incorrectly published.
About this article
Cite this article
Fukugawa, N. Effects of the quality of science on the initial public offering of university spinoffs: evidence from Japan. Scientometrics 127, 4439–4455 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04433-3
- Citation impact
- Initial public offering
- Quality of science
- University spinoffs