Abstract
In his recent Scientometrics article, Fassin (2021) asked the following question: Does the FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals? After collecting, calculating, and analyzing data about nine bibliometric indicators, Fassin responded to that question by stating that “[t]his bibliometric study confirms that the FT50 selection is able to identify the elite journals in economics and general management and most premier journals in the sub-disciplines”. In this Letter to the Editor, the author would like to highlight three major limitations in Fassin’s (2021) study: the first limitation is that the provided general ranking is biased towards journals that publish relatively more review articles. The second limitation is that it ignores Goodhart’s law. The third limitation is related to the very definition of a leading journal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Source WoS)
Notes
More information about the added versus dropped journals from each version of the Financial Times list of journals is available at: https://www.inkpothub.com/research-insights/what-is-ft-50/.
None of the FT50 journals is a fully open access journal (Laakso & Björk, 2021).
References
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2021). Retracted articles–The scientific version of fake news. In R. Greifeneder, M. E. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 47–70). Routledge.
Clarivate Analytics (2021)
Currid-Halkett, E., & Stolarick, K. (2011). The great divide: Economic development theory versus practice-a survey of the current landscape. Economic Development Quarterly, 25(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242410394358
Fassin, Y. (2021). Does the financial times FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals? Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03988-x
Hamet, J., Maurer, F. (2017). Is management research visible outside the academic community?. M@n@gement, 20(5), 492–516. https://www.cairn.info/revue-management-2017-5-page-492.htm.
Humphrey, C., Kiseleva, O., & Schleicher, T. (2019). A time-series analysis of the scale of coercive journal self-citation and its effect on impact factors and journal rankings. European Accounting Review, 28(2), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1470019
Kriz, A., Nailer, C., Jansen, K., & Potocnjak-Oxman, C. (2021). Teaching-practice as a critical bridge for narrowing the research-practice gap. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.017
Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2021). Open access journal publishing in the business disciplines: A closer look at the low uptake and discipline-specific considerations. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211006769
Lehmann, D. R., & Winer, R. S. (2019). The role and impact of reviewers on the marketing discipline. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0501-x
Lei, L., & Sun, Y. (2020). Should highly cited items be excluded in impact factor calculation? The effect of review articles on journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1697–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03338-y
Linacre, S. (2021). Cabells launches new SDG Impact Intensity journal rating system in partnership with Saint Joseph’s University’s Haub School of Business. The Source. Available at: https://blog.cabells.com/2021/03/17/cabells-launches-new-sdg-impact-intensity-journal-rating-system-in-partnership-with-saint-josephs-universitys-haub-school-of-business/
Martin, B. R. (2016). Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems–Which are appropriate and which not? Research Policy, 45(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.001
Miranda, R., & Garcia-Carpintero, E. (2018). Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1015–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.08.006
Setti, G. (2013). Bibliometric indicators: Why do we need more than one? IEEE Access, 1, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2261115
Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: Audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3%3C305::AID-EURO184%3E3.0.CO;2-4
Tucker, B., & Parker, L. (2014). In our ivory towers? The research-practice gap in management accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 44(2), 104–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.798234
Valderrama, Á., Jiménez-Contreras, E., Valderrama, P., Escabias, M., & Baca, P. (2019). Is the trend to publish reviews and clinical trials related to the journal impact factor? Analysis in dentistry field. Accountability in Research, 26(7), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1672541
Wilhite, A. W., & Fong, E. A. (2012). Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science, 335(6068), 542–543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212540
Wilhite, A., Fong, E. A., & Wilhite, S. (2019). The influence of editorial decisions and the academic network on self-citations and journal impact factors. Research Policy, 48(6), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.003
Funding
The author received no financial support for this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical statement
This paper has not been published elsewhere in any form. It has not been submitted simultaneously to any other publication outlet.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moussa, S. Are FT50 journals really leading? A comment on Fassin. Scientometrics 126, 9613–9622 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04158-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04158-9