Abstract
Publication of research in anaesthesia is increasingly competitive. Understanding what topics of research are more likely to be published and where, is clearly valuable for authors seeking to optimise reach and impact of their work. This study aimed to identify the relative proportion of anaesthesia articles by topic for five anaesthesia journals over a 10-year period from 2010 to 2019, including any differences between journals and regions. We chose five anaesthesia journals based on current impact factor. All journal issues published between 2010–2019 were checked for total number of articles with only original research articles being further categorised by topic, country of research, funding status and citation count. Of 5782 original research articles analysed, the most frequent article topics published were translational studies (16%) and clinical practice (16%). Obstetric anaesthesia was the least frequent published (4%). Translational studies were the most frequently funded (84%) while articles on paediatric anaesthesia were least frequently funded (29%). The average number of citations per funded article was 37 versus 28 for non-funded articles. Translational studies were the most frequently published topic of research conducted in North America (25%) and Asia (25%), but of only average frequency in Europe (9%). Studies in obstetric and paediatric anaesthesia are less well-represented in anaesthesia literature and researchers may experience greater difficulty publishing these topics and obtaining funding accordingly. Authors should be aware of the diverse publishing tendencies of the different journals in anaesthesia in order to save time and effort when submitting research for publication.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BJA:
-
British Journal of Anaesthesia
- EJA:
-
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
- RAPM:
-
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
- HIC:
-
High-income country
- LMIC:
-
Low/middle-income country
References
Archambault, È., & Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x
Bruder, N., Chew, M., Forget, P., et al. (2021). Our project for the Journal(s). European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 31(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001396
Chandrakantan, A., Adler, A., Stayer, S., & Roth, S. (2019). National Institutes of Health-Funded Anesthesiology Research and Anesthesiology Physician-Scientists: Trends, Promises and Concerns. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 129(6), 1761–1766. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004341
Chen, S. Y., Wei, L. F., & Ho, C. M. (2017). Trend of academic publication activity in anesthesiology: A 2-decade bibliographic perspective. Asian Journal of Anesthesiology, 55(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2016.06.005
Eisenach, J. (2015). Anesthesiology: Attracting the Best New Science in the Specialty. Anesthesiology, 122(6), 1198–1200. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000668
El-Boghdadly, K., Docherty, A. B., & Klein, A. A. (2018). Analysis of the distribution and scholarly output from National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (NIAA) research grants. Anaesthesia, 73(6), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14277
Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Ioannidis, J. (2017). Meta-assessment of bias in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(14), 3714–3719. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618569114
Feneck, R., Natarajan, N., Sebastian, R., & Naughton, C. (2008). Decline in research publications from the United Kingdom in anaesthesia journals from 1997 to 2006. Anaesthesia, 63(3), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05475.x
Guan, J., & Chen, J. (2011). Translational research and its effects on medicine in China. Chinese Medical Journal, 124(19), 3170–3175. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.19.038
Harris, M., Marti, J., Watt, H., Bhatti, Y., Macinko, J., & Darzi, A. (2017). Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians. Health Affairs, 36(11), 1997–2004. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0773
Hsieh, J. (2016). Author publication preferences and journal competition. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23657
Lacetera, N., & Zirulia, L. (2011). The economics of scientific misconduct. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 27(3), 568–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewp031
Li, D., & Cornelis, G. (2021). Differing perceptions concerning research misconduct between China and Flanders: A qualitative study. Accountability in Research, 28(2), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1802586
Maher, B., & Anfres, M. (2016). Young scientists under pressure: What the data show. Nature, 538(7626), 444–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/538444a
Merton, R. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
National Institutes of Health. (2020). FY 2019 RePORTER Project Data. National Institutes of Health. Retrieved July 15, 2021, from https://exporter.nih.gov/ExPORTER_Catalog.aspx
Pagel, P., & Judetz, J. (2015). Scholarly Productivity and National Institutes of Health Funding of Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research Grant Recipients: Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis. Anesthesiology, 123(3), 683–691. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000737
Ratnayake, G., El-Boghdadly, K., & Pandit, J. (2021). An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units. Anaesthesia, 76(4), 500–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15247
Reed, D., Cook, D., Beckman, T., Levine, R., Kern, D., & Wright, S. (2007). Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(9), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.9.1002
SCImago. (2020). SCImago Journal and Country Rank, 2020. SCImago. Retrieved May 31, 2020, from https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=2703
Surkis, A. (2018). The relative citation ratio: What is it and why should medical librarians care? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.499
Thomson Reuters. (2012). Global publishing: Changes in submission trends and the impact on scholarly publishers. Thomson Reuters. Retrieve July 15, 2021, from http://scholarone.com/media/pdf/GlobalPublishing_WP.pdf
Wang, X., Wang, E., Marincola, F. (2011). Translational Medicine is developing in China: A new venue for collaboration. Journal of Translational Medicine, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-3
World Bank. (2020). World Bank Country and Lending Groups, 2020. World Bank. Retrieved March 1, 2021, from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Rachel Ling and Aakanksha Sahu for their assistance with the original data collection.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Samuel Grace: concept, design, literature search, data acquisition, original draft and critical revision of draft, approval final draft; Floris Wiepking: concept, design, literature search, data acquisition, original draft and critical revision of draft, approval final draft; André Van Zundert: concept, design, literature search, data acquisition, original draft and critical revision of draft, approval final draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
None.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grace, S.G., Wiepking, F.S.S. & van Zundert, A.A.J. Hot topics in anaesthesia: a bibliometric analysis of five high-impact journals from 2010–2019. Scientometrics 126, 8749–8759 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04129-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04129-0