Abstract
Astronomy papers are most frequently composed and submitted in either Microsoft Word or LaTeX format. While most journals accept submissions in Word format (and some, such as Meteoritics and Planetary Science, until recently required Word format), the majority of astronomy papers posted to the arXiV are submitted in LaTeX format. The wisdom of using LaTeX is sometimes questioned: for instance, a recent study demonstrated that a set of 40 researchers and graduate students were able to transcribe text and tables more quickly and with fewer errors using Word rather than LaTeX, although LaTeX proved similarly efficient when it came to transcribing equations and was more enjoyable to use. However, the study had all participants reproduce a given source text. We suspect that the use of Word may influence an author to include fewer equations when creating an original work. This is a difficult hypothesis to test directly, so we instead use a subset of arXiV submissions to probe whether the use of LaTeX is correlated with the number of standalone equations in a manuscript. We find that PDF-only manuscripts on the arXiV have roughly half as many equations as those with LaTeX source files.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous. (2015). Nature, 517(7533), 125.
Bernstein, D. J. (2020). Optimizing for the wrong metric, part 1: Microsoft Word. https://blog.cr.yp.to/20201206-msword.html.
Blais, B. (2014). LaTeX vs word: Why i prefer the less WYSIWYG solution. https://bblais.github.io/posts/2014/Dec/31/latex-vs-word/.
Brischoux, F., & Legagneux, P. (2009). Don’t format manuscripts. The Scientist, 23(7), 24.
Gibbons, S. J. (2018). “As a reviewer for journals who allow both LaTeX and Word for submissions it is always the latter where I find (technical) errors in the referencing. (The manuscripts themselves are not split this way necessarily but BiBTeX takes away one source of agony and effort.)”. Twitter, 2018. https://twitter.com/stevenjgibbons/status/1032589734059696129.
Irwin, S. H. (2019). Writing papers in economics using fake LaTeX. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(4), 1348–1356. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12318.
Knauff, M., & Nejasmic, J. (2014). An efficiency comparison of document preparation systems used in academic research and development. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e115069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115069.
Knuth, D. D. (1984). The TeXbook. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 0-201-13447-0.
Lamport, L. (1986). LATEX: A document preparation system. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 020115790x.
Lemire, D. (2015). Knauff and Nejasmic recommend banning LaTeX. https://lemire.me/blog/2015/01/14/knauff-and-nejasmic-recommend-banning-latex/.
Lillie, B. (2014). “Def going to be the most controversial paper of the decade: Writing in science papers in word is better than LaTeX http://plosone.org/article/info:d...”. Twitter. https://twitter.com/benlillie/status/548553705650651139.
Matthews, D. (2019). Craft beautiful equations in Word with LaTeX. Nature, 570(7760), 263–264. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01796-1.
Pepe, A., Cantiello, M., & Nicholson, J. (2017). The arXiv of the future will not look like the arXiv. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1709.07020.
Pouzat, C. (2014). Re: [o] efficiency of org v. latex v. word—Look at the data! https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-12/msg00594.html.
Schuetzler, R. (2015). LaTeX vs word (again). https://www.schuetzler.net/blog/latex-vs-word-again/.
Statistics Committee of the Collider Detector at Fermilab. (2005). Error bars for Poisson data. https://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/statistics/notes/pois_eb.txt.
Taraborelli, D. (2008). The beauty of latex. https://cgvr.cs.uni-bremen.de/links/Dario%20Taraborelli,%20The%20Beauty%20of%20LaTeX.pdf.
Unwalla, M. (2006). LaTeX: An introduction. Communicator, Spring:33. 10.1163/9789004256064\_hao\_introduction.
Wilke, C. O. (2014). Post-publication review of the PLOS ONE paper comparing MS Word and LaTeX: How not to compare document preparation. https://clauswilke.com/blog/2014/12/27/post-publication-review-of-the-plos-one-paper-comparing-ms-word-and-latex-how-not-to-compare-document-preparation/.
Ziegler, G. (2000). How (La)TeX changed the face of mathematics. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, 49–51. https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/lamport-latex-interview.pdf.
Zinkstok, R., & Zinkstok, J. (2010). What is latex. http://www.rtznet.nl/zink/latex.php?lang=en.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author uses LaTeX in their own manuscript preparation and this may influence their interpretation of the results.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moorhead, A.V. Is LaTeX use correlated with the number of equations in a manuscript?. Scientometrics 126, 8259–8273 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04119-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04119-2