Abstract
Scientific research cooperation and co-authored papers are becoming increasingly popular in the era of big science. However, allocating appropriate credit to each co-author of papers remains a challenge. We consider author contribution declarations according to the contributor roles taxonomy (CRediT) scheme (assigning each co-author to 14 contributor roles) and propose a new method of author contribution to allocate co-authors’ credits reasonably by converting the 14 contributor roles in an article into a binary author-role matrix. Based on the data of PLOS ONE, we further explore the new method’s advantages by comparing with other representative methods: It normalizes the total credits of different articles to 1, avoiding the inflationary bias caused by the increasing number of co-authors; awards different credits per co-author based on the participation rate of contributor roles to avoid the equalization bias; reduces the impact of the increasing number of co-authors on the credit of the first co-author.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbas, A. M. (2011). Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship. Scientometrics, 88(1), 107–131.
Allen, L., Brand, A., Scott, J., Altman, M., & Hlava, M. (2014). Credit where credit is due. Nature, 508(7496), 312–313.
Baerlocher, M. O., Newton, M., Gautam, T., Tomlinson, G., & Detsky, A. S. (2007). The meaning of author order in medical research. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 55(4), 174–180.
Bates, T., Ani, A., Marusi, M., & Marusi, A. (2004). Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: Comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(1), 86–88.
Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 85(3), 741–754.
Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15(3), 263–270.
Berg, J. (2018). Transparent author credit. Science, 359(6379), 961.
Berker, Y. (2018). Golden-ratio as a substitute to geometric and harmonic counting to determine multi-author publication credit. Scientometrics, 114, 839–857.
Biswal, A. K. (2013). An absolute index (Ab-index) to measure a researcher’s useful contributions and productivity. PLOS ONE., 8(12), e84334.
Burrell, Q., & Rousseau, R. (1995). Fractional counts for authorship attribution: A numerical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(2), 97–102.
Cariani, A., Messinetti, S., Ferrari, A., et al. (2017). Improving the conservation of mediterranean Chondrichthyans: The ELASMOMED DNA barcode reference library. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0170244.
CASRAI. CRediT-Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieving from https://casrai.org/credit/. Accessed 17 Dec 2020.
Castelvecchi, D. Physics paper sets record with more than 5,000 authors. Retrieving from http://www.nature.com/news/physics-paper-sets-record-with-more-than-5-000-authors-1.17567. Accessed 20 Jan 2021.
Clement, T. P. (2014). Authorship matrix: A rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(2), 345–361.
Clement, T. P. (2015). Who are co-authors and what should be their responsibilities? Environmental Science & Technology, 49(6), 3265–3266.
Corrêa, E. C., Jr., Silva, F. N., Costa, L. F., & Amancio, D. R. (2017). Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 498–510.
Dong, Y. P., Wang, P. Z., Guo, L., & Liu, H. Q. (2016). “Listing author contribution’’ does not alter the author inflation in the publications in basic research in four major gastroenterology journals in 10 years. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1501–1507.
Egghe, L. (1996). Source-item production laws for the case that items have multiple sources with fractional counting of credits. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(10), 730–748.
Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., & Hooydonk, G. V. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 51(2), 145–157.
Fox, C. W., Ritchey, J. P., & Paine, C. E. T. (2018). Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography. Ecology and Evolution, 8, 11492–11507.
Frische, S. (2012). It is time for full disclosure of author contributions. Nature, 489(7417), 475.
Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Voronov, A. A., Koroleva, A. M., & Kitas, G. D. (2018). Updated editorial guidance for quality and reliability of research output. Journal of Korean Medical Science., 33(35), e247.
Hagen, N. T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLOS ONE, 3, e4021.
Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: Sharing authorship credit equitably - not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785–793.
Hagen, N. T. (2013). Harmonic co-author credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 784–791.
Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple co-authorship. Scientometrics, 85(3), 741–754.
Hodge, S. E., & Greenberg, D. A. (1981). Publication credit. Science, 213(4511), 13–14.
Hooydonk, G. V. (1997). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 944–945.
Hu, X., Rousseau, R., & Chen, J. (2010). In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices. Journal of Information Science, 36(1), 73–85.
Hwang, S. S., Song, H. H., Baik, J. H., Jung, S. L., Park, S. H., Choi, K. H., & Park, Y. H. (2003). Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: Analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. Radiology, 226(1), 16–23.
Holcombe, A. O. Contributorship, Not Authorship: Use CRediT to Indicate Who Did What. Retrieving from https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/3/48/htm. Accessed 12 Nov 2020.
ICMJE. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Retrieving from http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2020.
Kim, J., & Diesner, J. (2014). A network-based approach to co-authorship credit allocation. Scientometrics, 101(1), 587–602.
Kornhaber, R., McLean, L., & Baber, R. (2015). Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: An integrative review. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 10, 4837–4846.
Kosmulski, M. (2012). The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 639–644.
Kumar, S. (2018). Ethical concerns in the rise of co-authorship and its role as a proxy of research collaborations. Publications, 6(3), 1–9.
Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435.
Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10(2), 145–162.
Liu, X. Z., & Fang, H. (2012). Modifying h-index by allocating credit of multi-authored papers whose author names rank based on contribution. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 557–565.
Logan, J. M., Bean, S. B., & Myers, A. E. (2017). Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research? PLOS ONE., 12(6), e0179956.
Mcnutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., et al. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2557–2560.
Misra, D. M., Ravindran, V., & Agarwal, V. (2018). Integrity of authorship and peer review practices: Challenges and opportunities for improvement. Journal of Korean Medical Science., 33(46), e287.
Nylenna, M., Fagerbakk, F., & Kierulf, P. (2014). Authorship: Attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(1), 1–6.
Price, D. J. D. S. (1981). Multiple authorship. Science, 212(4498), 986.
Rahman, M. T., Regenstein, J. M., Kassim, N. A., & Haque, N. (2017). The need to quantify authors’ relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 275–281.
Rodriguez, A. P., Waltman, L., & Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195.
Sahoo, D. K., Abeysekara, N. S., Cianzio, S. R., Robertson, A. E., & Bhattacharyya, M. K. (2017). A novel phytophthora sojae resistance rps12 gene mapped to a genomic region that contains several rps genes. PLOS One, 12(1), e0169950.
Shen, H. W., & Barabási, A. L. (2014). Collective credit allocation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(34), 12325–12330.
Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLOS Biology, 5(1), e18.
Verhagen, J. V., Wallace, K. J., Collins, S. C., & Scott, T. R. (2003). QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors. Nature, 426(6967), 602.
Wislar, J. S., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., et al. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 343, d6128.
Yang, S., Wolfram, D., & Wang, F. (2017). The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: A comparison of three general medical journals. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1129–1273.
Zauner, H., Nogoy, N. A., Edmunds, S. C., Zhou, H. L., & Goodman, L. (2018). Editorial: We need to talk about authorship. GigaScience, 7(12), 1–4.
Zhang, C. T. (2009). A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank. Embo Reports, 10(5), 416–417.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the anonymous referees for important insightful comments and suggestions. This research was funded by Project of Ministry of Education in China (Grant no. 18JHQ043).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JD was involved in conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, supervision, review, the initial draft preparation, and the final draft editing. CL was involved in data collection, formal analysis, methodology, software, and the initial draft preparation. QZ was involved in formal analysis and review. WC was involved in the final draft editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, J., Liu, C., Zheng, Q. et al. A new method of co-author credit allocation based on contributor roles taxonomy: proof of concept and evaluation using papers published in PLOS ONE. Scientometrics 126, 7561–7581 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04075-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04075-x