Arkancideisreal. (2020a). Tweet. Retrieved 25 August 2020, from https://twitter.com/Arkancideisreal/status/1264667066813935616
Arkancideisreal. (2020b). Tweet. Retrieved 25 August 2020, from https://twitter.com/Arkancideisreal/status/1264032084944814082?s=20
Bae, S., Kim, M.-C., Kim, J. Y., Cha, H.-H., Lim, J. S., Jung, J., Kim, M.-J., Oh, D. Y., Lee, M.-K., Choi, S.-H., Sung, M., Hong, S.-B., Chung, J.-W., & Kim, S.-H. (2020). Notice of retraction: Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS-CoV-2. Annals of Internal Medicine, 173(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.7326/L20-0745.
Article
Google Scholar
Bae, S., Kim, M.-C., Kim, J. Y., Cha, H.-H., Lim, J. S., Jung, J., Kim, M.-J., Oh, D. Y., Lee, M.-K., Choi, S.-H., Sung, M., Hong, S.-B., Chung, J.-W., & Kim, S.-H. (2020). Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS–CoV-2: A controlled comparison in 4 patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 173(1), W22–W23. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1342.
Article
Google Scholar
Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2019). Retracted research articles from the RetractionWatch data base. Paper presented at the ISSI 2019—17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Rome, Italy.
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018.
Article
Google Scholar
Bornmann, L. (2013). Research misconduct—definitions, manifestations and extent. Publications, 1(3), 87–98.
Article
Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2018). Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention. Scientometrics, 115(2), 1097–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2698-6.
Article
Google Scholar
Bouchet-Valat, M. (2014). SnowballC: Snowball stemmers based on the C libstemmer UTF-8 library. R package version 0.5.1. Retrieved 11 August 2020, 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SnowballC
Chambers, L. M., Michener, C. M., & Falcone, T. (2019). Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 126(9), 1134–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15689.
Copiello, S. (2020). Other than detecting impact in advance, alternative metrics could act as early warning signs of retractions: tentative findings of a study into the papers retracted by PLoS ONE. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03698-w.
Article
Google Scholar
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003–2019.
Article
Google Scholar
da Silva, T., Jaime, A., & Dobránszki, J. (2019). A new dimension in publishing ethics: social media-based ethics-related accusations. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 17(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-05-2018-0051.
Article
Google Scholar
Erfanmanesh, M., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2019). Is the soundness-only quality control policy of open access mega journals linked to a higher rate of published errors? Scientometrics, 120(2), 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03153-5.
Article
Google Scholar
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
Article
Google Scholar
Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Meyer, D. (2008). Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), 1–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Fellows, I. (2014). Wordcloud: Word clouds. R package version 2.5. Retrieved 11 August 2020, 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud
Gehlenborg, N. (2019). UpSetR: A more scalable alternative to Venn and Euler diagrams for visualizing intersecting sets. R package version 1.4.0. Retrieved 23 June 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=UpSetR
Ghebreyesus, T. A. (2020). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020: World Health Organzation.
Haustein, S. (2019). Scholarly Twitter metrics. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. (pp. 729–760). Springer International Publishing.
Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Lariviere, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS One, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120495.
Hornik, K. (2014). NLP: Natural language processing infrastructure. R package version 0.1–5. Retrieved 11 August 2020, 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NLP
Lang, D. T., & the CRAN team. (2018). RCurl: General network (HTTP/FTP/...) client interface for R, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RCurl
Mehra, M. R., Desai, S. S., Ruschitzka, F., & Patel, A. N. (2020a). Retracted: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: A multinational registry analysis. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6.
Article
Google Scholar
Mehra, M. R., Ruschitzka, F., & Patel, A. N. (2020b). Retraction—hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: A multinational registry analysis. The Lancet, 395(10240), 1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31324-6.
Article
Google Scholar
Müller, K., Wickham, H., James, D. A., & Falcon, S. (2017). RSQLite: 'SQLite' interface for R. R package version 2.0. Retrieved 22 June 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RSQLite
Neuwirth, E. (2014). RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer palettes. R package version 1.1–2. Retrieved 11 August 2020, 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer
Pinjos, L. (2020). Tweet. Retrieved 24 August 2020, from https://twitter.com/LPinjos/status/1266639081720754176
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.6.0). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
Rapani, A., Lombardi, T., Berton, F., Del Lupo, V., Di Lenarda, R., & Stacchi, C. (2020). Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 6(4), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.292.
Article
Google Scholar
Rathmann, J. M. K., & Rauhut, H. (2019). Teams prevent misconduct: A study of retracted articles from the Web of Science. Paper presented at the ISSI 2019—17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Rome, Italy.
Roe, P., & Lewison, G. (2019). The anatomy of retracted papers in the Web of Science, 1998–2017. Paper presented at the ISSI 2019—17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Rome, Italy.
Rosenkrantz, A. B. (2016). Retracted publications within radiology journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 206(2), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15163.
Article
Google Scholar
R Special Interest Group on Databases (R-SIG-DB), Wickham, H., & Müller, K. (2018). DBI: R Database Interface.
Schwartz, I. (2020). Twitter. Retrieved 24 August 2020, from https://twitter.com/GermHunterMD/status/1267496755702054917
Shema, H., Hahn, O., Mazarakis, A., & Peters, I. (2019). Retractions from altmetric and bibliometric perspectives. Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 70(2–3), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2019-2006.
Article
Google Scholar
Sidholm, J.-W. (2020). Tweet. Retrieved 24 August 2020, from https://twitter.com/John_Will_I_Am/status/1248328733397671936
Sotudeh, H., Barahmand, N., Yousefi, Z., & Yaghtin, M. (2020). How do academia and society react to erroneous or deceitful claims? The case of retracted articles’ recognition. Journal of Information Science, 0165551520945853,. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520945853.
Stamets, B. (2020). Tweet. Retrieved 25 August 2020, from https://twitter.com/BillStamets/status/1263845285803016202
Sugawara, Y., Tanimoto, T., Miyagawa, S., Murakami, M., Tsuya, A., Tanaka, A., Kami, M., & Narimatsu, H. (2017). Scientific misconduct and social media: Role of twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(2), e57. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6706.
Article
Google Scholar
Sugimoto, C. (2016). "Attention is not impact" and other challenges for altmetrics. Retrieved September, 9, 2016, from https://hub.wiley.com/community/exchanges/discover/blog/2015/06/23/attention-is-not-impact-and-other-challenges-for-altmetrics
Toupin, R. (2020). twitterprofiles. Retrieved 22 June 2020, from https://github.com/toupinr/twitterprofiles
Toupin, R., Millerand, F., & Larivière, V. (2019). Scholarly communication or public communication of science? Assessing who engage with climate change research on Twitter. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2019) with a special STI conference track, Rome, Italy.
Toupin, R., & Haustein, S. (2018). A climate of sharing: Who are the users engaging with climate research on Twitter. Paper presented at the altmetrics18 Workshop at the 5:AM Conference, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7166393.v1
Vainio, J., & Holmberg, K. (2017). Highly tweeted science articles: Who tweets them? An analysis of Twitter user profile descriptions. Scientometrics, 112(1), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2368-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Vincent, B. (2020). Tweet. Retrieved 24 August 2020, from https://twitter.com/BenjaminGVincen/status/1248243908837965828
Vuong, Q.-H., La, V.-P., Ho, M.-T., Vuong, T.-T., & Ho, M.-T. (2020). Characteristics of retracted articles based on retraction data from online sources through February 2019. Science Editing, 7(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.187.
Article
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Xu, W., Hu, G., Xia, S., Sun, Z., Liu, Z., Xie, Y., Zhang, R., Jiang, S., & Lu, L. (2020). Retraction Note to: SARS-CoV-2 infects T lymphocytes through its spike protein-mediated membrane fusion. Cellular & Molecular Immunology, 17(8), 894–894. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0498-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Xu, W., Hu, G., Xia, S., Sun, Z., Liu, Z., Xie, Y., Zhang, R., Jiang, S., & Lu, L. (2020). Retracted article: SARS-CoV-2 infects T lymphocytes through its spike protein-mediated membrane fusion. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0424-9.
Article
Google Scholar
Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. . Springer-Verlag.
Watson, J. (2020). An open letter to Mehra et al and The Lancet. Retrieved 24 August 2020, from https://zenodo.org/record/3862789#.X0PgGc9CSUn
Wickham, H. (2017a). Httr: Tools for working with URLs and HTTP, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=httr
Wickham, H. (2017b). Tidyverse: Easily install and load the 'Tidyverse'. R package version 1.2.1. Retrieved 22 June 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse
World Health Organization. (2020). Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Retrieved 24 August 2020, from https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)
Yuan, J., Feng, L., & Yang, L. (2019). A multi-dimensional observation framework of retracted publications. Paper presented at the ISSI 2019 – 17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Rome, Italy.
Zhang, Q., Abraham, J., & Fu, H.-Z. (2020). Collaboration and its influence on retraction based on retracted publications during 1978–2017. Scientometrics, 125(1), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03636-w.
Article
Google Scholar
Zuckerman, H. (2020). Is “the time ripe” for quantitative research on misconduct in science? Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00065.
Article
Google Scholar