In this study, we compare the article impact in terms of article usage between open access (OA) and non-open access (Non-OA) articles from both the temporal and spatial perspectives. Articles published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) were selected as our research objects. Daily article metric data have been tracked and collected from nejm.org and updated every day for over a year. The results of the study confirm the OA usage advantage to a certain extent. OA increases the article views, expands the geographical scope of article readers, and promotes knowledge diffusion. However, the delayed OA policy has no obvious improvement on the OA effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alperin, J. P. (2015). Geographic variation in social media metrics: An analysis of Latin American journal articles. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 289–304.
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1954–1962.
Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Walch-Solimena, C., et al. (2011). Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 537–546.
Bornmann, L., & Waltman, L. (2011). The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science: A visualization approach by using density maps. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 547–553.
Carling, J., Bivand, E. M., Harstad, B., et al. (2018). Plan S: At the crossroads of open access to research: An assessment of the possible consequences of Plan S for publishing, research quality and research environments. Peace Research Institute Oslo and Faculty of Social Sciences. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Chen, B. (2017). Usage pattern comparison of the same scholarly articles between Web of Science (WoS) and Springer. Scientometrics, 115(1), 519–537.
Chen, Y., Wang, Z. Q., Tan, J. G., & Liu, Z. Y. (2017). The position of preprint in scholarly communication: A bibliometric and empirical study of ArXiv. In I. Atanassova, M. Bertin, & P. Mayr (Eds.), The 16th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 799–809). Wuhan: ISSI, Wuhan University.
Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., et al. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 337(7665), 343–345.
Davis, P. M., & Price, J. S. (2006). eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: Implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1243–1248.
Davis, P. M., & Solla, L. R. (2003). An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(11), 1062–1068.
Duy, J., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5), 512–517.
Evans, J. A., & Reimer, J. (2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323(5917), 1025.
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), 692–698.
Ezema, I. J., & Onyancha, O. B. (2017). Citation impact of health and medical journals in Africa: Does open accessibility matter? Electronic Library, 35(5), 934–952.
Fang, Z. C., Guo, X. H., Yang, Y., et al. (2017). Measuring global research activities using geographic data of scholarly article visits. Electronic Library, 35(4), 822–838.
Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 222–232.
Herfindahl, O. C. (1950). Concentration in the steel industry. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.
Holmberg, K., Hedman, J., Bowman, T. D., Didegah, F., & Laakso, M. (2019). Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish Universities. Scientometrics, 122(1), 645–659.
Hua, F., Sun, H., Walsh, T., et al. (2017). Open access to journal articles in oncology: current situation and citation impact. Annals of Oncology Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 28(10), 2612–2617.
Joint, N. (2009). The Antaeus column: Does the “open access” advantage exist? A librarian’s perspective. Library Review, 58(7), 477–481.
Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521.
Leydesdorff, L., & Persson, O. (2010). Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1622–1634.
Liu, Z. Y., Chen, C. M., Hou, H. Y., et al. (2009). Towards an epoch of great changes of science studies. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 30(07), 5–12. (in Chinese).
Liu, Z. Y., Chen, Y., & Song, C. (2017). Global innovation center: Origin, meaning and conditions. China SciTechnology Business, 10, 52–58. (in Chinese).
Liu, Z. Y., & Zhu, X. Y. (2012). Measuring and mapping of international scientometrics and its sister disciplines. Science & Technology Review, 30(07), 68–79. (in Chinese).
Mccabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2014). Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 52(4), 1284–1300.
Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054.
NEJM. (2020). Access in low-income countries. Accessible at https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/access-in-developing-countries. Accessed November 2020.
Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963–1972.
Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., et al. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Accessed 27 February 2020.
Tang, M., Bever, J. D., & Yu, F. H. (2017). Open access increases citations of papers in ecology. Ecosphere, 8(7), e01887. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1887.
Thatcher, J. (2014). Living on fumes: Digital footprints, data fumes, and the limitations of spatial big data. International Journal of Communication, 8(1), 1765–1783.
Thelwall, M., & Maflahi, N. (2015). Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of Mendeley readers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(6), 1124–1135.
UNDP. (2010). Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations - Pathways to Human Development. New York. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2010.
Van Noorden, R. (2010). Cities: Building the best cities for science. Nature, 467(7318), 906–908.
Wang, X. W., Chen, L., Mao, W., et al. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555–564.
Wang, X. W., Cui, Y. X., Xu, S. M., et al. (2018). The state and evolution of Gold open access: A country and discipline level analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 573–584.
Wang, X. W., Fang, Z. C., Li, Q. C., & Guo, X. H. (2016). The poor altmetric performance of publications authored by researchers in Mainland China. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2016.00008.
Wang, X. W., Peng, L., Zhang, C. B., et al. (2013a). Exploring scientists’ working timetable: A global survey. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 665–675.
Wang, X. W., Wang, Z., & Xu, S. M. (2013b). Tracing scientist’s research trends realtimely. Scientometrics, 95(2), 717–729.
Wang, X. W., Xu, S. M., Peng, L., et al. (2012). Exploring scientists’ working timetable: Do scientists often work overtime? Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 655–660.
Yan, E., & Li, K. (2018). Which domains do open-access journals do best in? A 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(6), 844–856.
We gratefully acknowledge the Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71673038, 71974029).
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Xie, W. et al. The open access usage advantage: a temporal and spatial analysis. Scientometrics 126, 6187–6199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03836-4
- Usage metrics
- OA advantage
- Immediate OA
- Delayed OA