Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effecting variables of journal’s ranking in forestry field

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Journal impact factor (JIF) and journal ranking play essential roles in scholarly publishing and research assessment, but the overuse of these metrics has recently drawn criticism. One topic of major debate is that certain objective measurable and controlled variables, including publication delay, journal size and article size, could impact JIF; in addition, journal identity is increasingly becoming a matter of concern. In this study, we focus mainly on the links between publication delays, number of published articles per year, average paper length and JIF and explore the mechanisms of journal ranking levels according to these variables. After a thorough survey of 53 forestry journals, we find that (1) compared to other fields, forestry research has a humble publishing culture with a lower JIF, smaller journal size, longer articles and rather substantial time to accept and publish the original articles in their final form. (2) More published articles per year could help a forestry journal rank in the top 50%. In addition, for non open access journals, a shorter period between manuscript acceptance and the final published version, a longer time between online available and final publication, and more time from articles receiving to online posting positively impact journal ranking; while for open access journals, longer paper length and faster article acceptance has a positive influence on ranking. (3) There is statistical evidence that publication practice preferences exist between different ranking levels. This research provides an objective view for rethinking the overdependence on JIF and journal ranking in research assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, D. (2002). The counting house. Nature, 415(6873), 726–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al, U., & Soydal, I. (2017). Publication lag and early view effects in information science journals. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(2), 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves-Silva, E., Porto, A. C. F., Firmino, C., Silva, H. V., Becker, I., Resende, L., et al. (2016). Are the impact factor and other variables related to publishing time in ecology journals? Scientometrics, 108(3), 1445–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amat, C. B. (2008). Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting. Scientometrics, 74(3), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, P. (2008). A longer paper gathers more citations. Nature, 455(7211), 274–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 914–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M. (2018). Journals that rise from the fourth quartile to the first quartile in six years or less: Mechanisms of change and the role of journal self-citations. Publications, 6(4), e47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, D. S. (2019). Elsevier investigates hundreds of peer reviewers for manipulating citations. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02639-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Chen, H. C., & Jhanji, V. (2013). Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in Ophthalmology journals. Ophtalmology, 120(8), 1697–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 861–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverría, M., Stuart, D., & Cordón-García, J.-A. (2017). The influence of online posting dates on the bibliometric indicators of scientific articles. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40(3), e183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G. (2002). The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 947–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Else, H. (2019). Impact factors are still widely used in academic evaluations. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01151-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56(4), 223–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Zarkali, A., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Bardakas, V., & Mavros, M. N. (2013). The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e49476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-Sapena, A., Sánchez-Pérez, E. A., Peset, F., González, L. M., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2016). The impact factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 306–314.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, I., & Steiger, H. (2018). Dynamics of journal impact factors and limits to their inflation. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 50(1), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, J. A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, R., Fdez-Valdivia, J., & Martínez-Baena, J. (2012). On first quartile journals which are not of highest impact. Scientometrics, 90(3), 925–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., et al. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heneberg, P. (2013). Effects of print publication lag in dual format journals on scientometric indicators. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e59877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalcioglu, M. T., Ileri, Y., Karaca, S., Egilmez, O. K., & Kokten, N. (2015). Research on the submission, acceptance and publication times of articles submitted to international otorhinolaryngology journals. Acta Informatica Medica, 23(6), 379–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Kim, K., & Lee, Y. (2017). Publication delay of Korean medical journals. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(8), 1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1235.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Hu, G., & Gu, M. (2016). The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1273–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marder, E., Kettenmann, H., & Grillner, S. (2010). Impacting our young. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 21233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R. (2016). Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems—Which are appropriate and which not? Research Policy, 45(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavros, M. N., Bardakas, V., Rafailidis, P. I., Sardi, T. A., Demetriou, E., & Falagas, M. E. (2013). Comparison of number of citations to full original articles versus brief reports. Scientometrics, 94(1), 203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pautasso, M., & Schäfer, H. (2010). Peer review delay and selectivity in ecology journals. Scientometrics, 84(2), 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisoschi, A. M., & Pisoschi, C. G. (2016). Is open access the solution to increase the impact of scientific journals? Scientometrics, 109(2), 1075–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebo, P., Fournier, P. J., Ragot, C., Gorioux, P. H., Herrmann, F. R., & Maisonneuve, H. (2019). Factors associated with publication speed in general medical journals: A retrospective study of bibliometric data. Scientometrics, 119(2), 1037–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314, 498–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, S., Rousseau, R., Wang, D., Zhu, D., Liu, H., & Liu, R. (2015). Editorial delay and its relation to subsequent citations: The journals nature, science and cell. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1867–1873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, D. B., Rousseau, R., Yang, L., & Li, J. (2017). A journal’s impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 780–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B.-C. (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tort, A. B., Targino, Z. H., & Amaral, O. B. (2012). Rising publication delays inflate journal impact factors. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e53374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, A. W., & Fong, E. A. (2012). Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science, 335(6068), 542–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P. (2017). Eugene Garfield (1925–2017). Nature, 543(7642), 492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, A. W. K. (2019). Higher impact factor of neuroimaging journals is associated with larger number of articles published and smaller percentage of uncited articles. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, e523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G., Wang, X. H., & Yu, D. R. (2005). The influence of publication delays on impact factors. Scientometrics, 64(2), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Higher Education, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, People’s Republic of China

    Minxian Zheng & Yantong Zhang

  2. Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, People’s Republic of China

    Kuangji Zhao

  3. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, People’s Republic of China

    Shikui Zhao

Authors
  1. Minxian Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuangji Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shikui Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yantong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shikui Zhao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, M., Zhao, K., Zhao, S. et al. Effecting variables of journal’s ranking in forestry field. Scientometrics 125, 135–151 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03629-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03629-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation