Skip to main content
Log in

Should I stay or should I go? Using bibliometrics to identify the international mobility of highly educated Greek manpower

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the mobility of the highly educated young Greek scholars. This is made possible through a bibliometric analysis of the affiliation countries of scholars who have published in peer reviewed journals indexed in Scopus. Approximately half of the researchers are identified from publications covered in Scopus for the period 2000–2019. A general taxonomy model is followed for analysing scientific mobility using affiliation changes. The greatest share of researchers (78.3%) appear to be static (74.6% in Greece and 3.7% abroad), whereas the mobile researcher category (21.7%) is divided into migrants (8.9%)—researchers who have left their country of origin—and travellers (12.8%)—researchers who gain additional affiliations while maintaining affiliation with their country of origin. According to the findings, the majority and especially the researcher elite (90.5%) did not sever ties with their country of origin, Greece, but instead built a chain of affiliations that linked nations together. Such chains are represented as groups of countries (clusters), in which the scientific connections between different countries can be visualised. It can be reasoned that the majority of researchers (70.3%) have a tendency to publish to a group of countries with ‘traditionally’ significant scientific impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.didaktorika.gr/eadd/?locale=en.

  2. https://dev.elsevier.com/.

  3. https://dev.elsevier.com/scopus.html.

  4. https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php.

References

  • Armijo-Olivo, S., et al. (2012). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: Methodological research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalamandaris, A., et al. (2006). All Greek to me! An automatic Greeklish to Greek transliteration system. In LREC (pp. 1226–1229).

  • Falagas, M. E., et al. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623–2628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J., & McKenzie, D. (2014). Scientific mobility and knowledge networks in high emigration countries: Evidence from the Pacific. Research Policy, 43(9), 1486–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakos, A. (2003). Greeklish: An experimental interface for automatic transliteration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(11), 1069–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2003). Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help? Scientometrics, 57(2), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., & Halevi, G. (2014). A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1987–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review, E69(2), 026113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson-Garcia, N., et al. (2019). The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientists. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R., et al. (2017). Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move. Nature News, 550(7674), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric net-works. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285–320). Springer.

  • Van Eck, N. J. (2019). VOSviewer manual version 1.6.13. Leiden: University Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., et al. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L., & Eck, N. J. V. (2013). A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. The European Physical Journal B, 86(11), 471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L., Eck, N. J. V., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L., & Noyons, E. (2018). Bibliometric and research management and research evaluation. A brief introduction. Amsterdam: Universiteit Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Sioumalas-Christodoulou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sachini, E., Karampekios, N., Brutti, P. et al. Should I stay or should I go? Using bibliometrics to identify the international mobility of highly educated Greek manpower. Scientometrics 125, 641–663 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03618-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03618-y

Keywords

Navigation