Skip to main content
Log in

Communities of attention networks: introducing qualitative and conversational perspectives for altmetrics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose to analyze the level of recommendation and spreading in the sharing of scientific papers on Twitter to understand the interactions of communities around papers and to develop the “community of attention network” (CAN). In this paper, a pilot case study was conducted for the paper ‘Pharmacological Treatment of Obesity’ authored by Mancini and Halpern (Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia 46(5):497–512, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27302002000500003), an extensive review of the criteria for evaluating the efficacy of anti-obesity treatments and derived pharmacological agents. The altmetric data was collected from Altmetric.com and the description information for each tweeter was extracted from their Twitter profiles. The data were analyzed with Microanalysis of Online Data perspective to investigate the formation of a CAN around this focal paper and the context of its formation. The studied article received 736 tweets from 134 different users with a combined exposure of more than 459,018 followers and a high level of spreading (67.26%) and recommendation (28.53%). The user’s bios information analysis of who shares the article indicate individual profiles focused on personal issues and strong civic and political engagement. Personal-professional and institutional tweeters of the national political scene are often mentioned in the tweets. In analyzing the content of the tweets, we note that the altmetric score of the paper is a result of its strategic use as an online activism resource and a digital advocacy tool used to mobilize stakeholders for awareness and support activities. This study and the contextual and network perspective it introduces may help to understand the social impact of publications by using altmetrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ANVISA—is the acronym of the Brazilian National Sanitary Surveillance Agency, a regulatory agency, in the form of a special regime autarchy, linked to the Ministry of Health. The agency exercises sanitary control of all products and services (national or imported) subject to health surveillance, such as medicines, food, cosmetics, sanitizers, tobacco products, medical products, blood, blood products and health services.

References

  • Alperin, J. P., Gomez, C. J., & Haustein, S. (2019). Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles. Public Understanding of Science,28(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518761733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, R. F., & Furnival, A. C. M. (2016). Comunicação científica e atenção online: em busca de colégios virtuais que sustentam métricas alternativas. Informação & Informação,21(2), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2016v21n2p68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, R. F., Oliveira, M., & Lucas, E. R. O. (2017). Altmetria de artigos de periódicos brasileiros de acesso aberto na ScienceOpen uma análise das razões de menções. Reciis: Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde,11(sup), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In Proceedings of the Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, 43, pp 1–10, Honolulu, HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412.

  • Brasil, Câmara dos Deputados. (2011). Retrieved November 4, 2018 from Projetos de lei e outras proposições: PL 2431/2011. Retrieved from, http://www.camara.gov.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=522126.

  • CGI. Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil. (2017). TIC domicílios 2016: pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias de informação e comunicação nos domicílios brasileiros (p. 430). São Paulo: Núcleo de Informação e Coordenação do Ponto BR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer F. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. Presented at the 5th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, ICWSM, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved November 4, 2018 from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2847.

  • Costas, R. (2017). Towards the social media studies of science: Social media metrics, present and future. Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación,13(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations. Aslib Journal of Information Management,67(3), 260–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2014-0173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dıaz-Faes, A. A., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2019). Towards a second generation of ‘social media metrics’: Characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science. PLoS ONE,14(5), e0216408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, J. M., Traynor, R. L., Gruzd, A., Mai, P., Dormuth, C. R., & Sketris, I. S. (2018). Measuring the impact of pharmacoepidemiologic research using altmetrics: A case study of a CNODES drug-safety article. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D., Stommel, W., Paulus, T., Lester, J., & Reed, D. (2015). Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of “digital CA”. Discourse, Context & Media,7, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Valiente, C. L., Pacheco-Mendoza, J., & Arencibia-Jorge, R. (2016). A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation. Learned Publishing,29, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quarterly,43(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012471585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, S. (2018a). Scholarly Twitter metrics. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Springer. arXiv:1806.02201.

  • Haustein, S. (2018b). Never put off till tomorrow, what you can tweet today or: How quickly research papers spread on twitter. Altmetric Blog, 5. Retrieved November 12, 2018 from https://www.altmetric.com/blog/never-put-off-till-tomorrow-what-you-can-tweet-today-or-how-quickly-research-papers-spread-on-twitter/.

  • Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2015). “Communities of attention” around scientific publications: Who is tweeting about scientific papers? Presented at the Social Media & Society 2015 International Conference, Toronto, Canada. Retrieved November 12, 2018 from https://www.slideshare.net/StefanieHaustein/communities-of-attention-around-journal-papers-who-is-tweeting-about-scientific-publications.

  • Haustein, S., & Costas, R. (2015). Retrieved November 12, 2018 from Identifying Twitter audiences: Who is tweeting about scientific papers? Presented at the ASIS&T SIG/MET Metrics 2015 workshop. Retrieved from https://www.asist.org/SIG/SIGMET/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/sigmet2015_paper_11.pdf.

  • Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., & Larivière, V. (2016). Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of Tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.,65(4), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, K., Bowman, T. D., Haustein, S., & Peters, I. (2014). Astrophysicists’ conversational connections on Twitter. PLoS ONE,9(8), e106086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Paper presented at the system sciences, HICSS ‘09. 42nd Hawaii international conference, Big Island, HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.89.

  • Joubert, M., & Costas, R. (2019). Getting to know science tweeters: A pilot analysis of South African twitter users tweeting about research articles. Journal of Altmetrics,2(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences,112, 7426–7431. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424329112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Yoo, J. (2012). Role of sentiment in message propagation: Reply vs. retweet behavior in political communication. Paper presented at the international conference on social informatics, Lausanne, Switzerland (pp. 131–136). https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialInformatics.2012.33.

  • Mancini, M. C., & Halpern, A. (2002). Tratamento Farmacológico da Obesidade. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia,46(5), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27302002000500003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society,13(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, A., & Briggs, P. (2014). Understanding twitter influence in the health domain: A socialpsychological contribution. Paper presented at the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web, Seoul, Korea (pp. 673–678). https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2579280.

  • Metaxas, P., Mustafaraj, E., Wong, K., Zeng, L., O’Keefe, M., & Finn, S. (2014). Do retweets indicate interest, trust, agreement? Paper presented at the computation and journalism symposium, New York, NY (pp. 1–5). arXiv:1411.3555.

  • Metaxas, P., Mustafaraj, E., Wong, K., Zeng, L., O’Keefe, M., & Finn, S. (2015). What do retweets indicate? Results from user survey and meta-review of research. Paper presented at the 9th international AAAI conference on web and social media, Oxford, England (pp. 658–661).

  • Nelhans, G., & Lorentzen, D. G. (2016). Twitter conversation patterns related to research papers. Information Research,21(2), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olijhoek, T. (2011). Open access week 2011: A short history of open access. Openaccessweek Blogs. Retrieved from October 27, 2011, from https://goo.gl/917czi.

  • Pereira, J., Pasquali, A., Saleiro, P., Rossetti, R., & Cacho, N. (2017). Characterizing geolocated tweets in Brazilian megacities. In 2017 International smart cities conference (ISC2) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC2.2017.8090832.

  • Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved October 26, 2010, from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.

  • Recuero, R., & Zago, G. (2009). Em busca das “redes que importam”: redes sociais e capital social no Twitter. Líbero, São Paulo,12(24), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,68(9), 2037–2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Honk, J., & Costas, R. (2016). Integrating context in Twitter metrics: Preliminary investigation on the possibilities of hashtags as an altmetric resource. Paper presented at the Altmetrics16 workshop, Bucharest, Romania.

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics,59(3), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018543.82441.f1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S., Lörcher, I., & Brüggemann, M. (2019). Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate. Public Understanding of Science,28(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519844131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2018). Social media metrics for new research evaluation. In W. Glänzel, H. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Xiao, T., Xu, S., & Wang, Y. (2019). Who posts scientific tweets? An investigation into the productivity, locations, and identities of scientific tweeters. Journal of Informetrics,13(3), 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq (426777/2016-6) and the Alagoas Research Foundation—FAPEAL (600301057/2016) for the financial support. The author would also like to thank Fábio Gouveia for comments, Rodrigo Costas for proofreading and English review and Gustavo Caran for his help in analyzing the graph data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronaldo Ferreira Araujo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Araujo, R.F. Communities of attention networks: introducing qualitative and conversational perspectives for altmetrics. Scientometrics 124, 1793–1809 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03566-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03566-7

Keywords

Navigation