Abstract
The journal Scientometrics recently featured a study on the citation impact of video abstracts and subsequent debate on the actual scope of the same impact. As things stand, the crucial issue of that debate lies in the motivations behind the authors’ choice to equip (some of) their articles with video abstracts. It can be easily understood that those motivations are hardly observable, and it is indeed agreed that observational limitations make them difficult to unravel. Nonetheless, the debate has seen the emergence of two different positions. The first may be summarized as follows: ask the authors to speak out about their motivations and rely on the elicited answers. The second bases itself on the opposite cornerstone: let the data tell the story about authors’ motivations. This recalls the distinction between stated preferences and revealed preferences. Here I develop some arguments in favor of the latter approach as far as the analysis of new media’s citation impact is concerned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Ben-Akiva, M., Bradley, M., Morikawa, T., Benjamin, J., Novak, T., Oppewal, H., et al. (1994). Combining revealed and stated preferences data. Marketing Letters,5(4), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999209.
Berkowitz, J. (2013). Video abstracts, the latest trend in scientific publishing. University Affairs. Retrieved February 6 https://www.universityaffairs.ca/features/feature-article/video-abstracts-the-latest-trend-in-scientific-publishing/
Blumenschein, K., Johannesson, M., Blomquist, G. C., Liljas, B., & O’Conor, R. M. (1998). Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Southern Economic Journal,65(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061360.
Coccetta, F. (2018). Medical video abstracts: A web genre for research accessibility and visibility. In Scholarly pathways: Knowledge transfer and knowledge exchange in academia. Bergamo: University of Bergamo, Centro di Ricerca sui Linguaggi Specialistici.
Coccetta, F. (2019). Analysing video abstracts in the academic field: A methodological proposal. In Mediating specialised knowledge: Challenges and opportunities for LSP communication, translation and research. Padova: University of Padua, Department of Linguistic and Literary Studies.
Cooke, S. J., Gallagher, A. J., Sopinka, N. M., Nguyen, V. M., Skubel, R. A., Hammerschlag, N., et al. (2017). Considerations for effective science communication. FACETS,2(1), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0055.
Copiello, S. (2020). The alleged citation advantage of video abstracts may be a matter of self-citations and self-selection bias. Comment on “The impact of video abstract on citation counts” by Zong et al. Scientometrics, 122(1), 751–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03173-1.
Hafeez, D. M., Jalal, S., & Khosa, F. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of manuscript characteristics that influence citations: A comparison of six major psychiatry journals. Journal of Psychiatric Research,108, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.07.010.
Jackson, D. P. (2017). Video abstracts now available. American Journal of Physics,85(2), 85–86. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4973116.
Jackson, D. P. (2018). A call for more video abstracts. American Journal of Physics,86(7), 485–486. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5039339.
Johannesson, M., Liljas, B., & Johansson, P.-O. (1998). An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions. Applied Economics,30(5), 643–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368498325633.
Kim, J. (2010). Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(9), 1909–1922. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21336.
Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,37(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017.
Kirby DA (2008) Hollywood knowledge: communication between scientific and entertainment cultures. In: D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts (pp. 165–180). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_10.
Ladher, N., & Jarvies, D. (2013). Video abstracts. BMJ,347, f7617–f7617. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7617.
Lake, F. (2018). Introducing graphical and video abstracts. BioTechniques,65(4), 179–179. https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2018-0131.
Lee, J., Oh, S., Dong, H., Wang, F., & Burnett, G. (2019). Motivations for self-archiving on an academic social networking site: A study on researchgate. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,70(6), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24138.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2017). Networked scholarship and motivations for social media use in scholarly communication. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,18(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2859.
McGrath, J. M., & Brandon, D. (2016). Video abstracts. Advances in Neonatal Care,16(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000271.
Nández, G., & Borrego, Á. (2013). Use of social networks for academic purposes: A case study. Electronic Library,31(6), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-03-2012-0031.
Pferschy-Wenzig, E.-M., Pferschy, U., Wang, D., Mocan, A., & Atanasov, A. (2016). Does a graphical abstract bring more visibility to your paper? Molecules,21(9), 1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21091247.
Plank, M., Marín-Arraiza, P., & Molnár, A. D. (2018). Video abstracts for scientific education. In A. Volungeviciene & A. Szűcs (Eds.), Exploring the micro, meso and macro. Navigating between dimensions in the digital learning landscape. EDEN 2018 annual conference (pp. 123–130). Budapest: EDEN European Distance and E-Learning Network, University of Technology and Economics.
Reupert, A. (2017). Promoting research through video abstracts. Advances in Mental Health,15(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2017.1312761.
Riise, J. (2008). Bringing science to the public. In: D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts (pp. 301–309). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_18
Spicer, S. (2014). Exploring video abstracts in science journals: An overview and case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2), eP1110. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1110.
Stevenson, H. A., & Harrison, J. E. (2009). Structured abstracts: Do they improve citation retrieval from dental journals? Journal of Orthodontics,36(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120722932.
Toffel, M. W. (2016). Enhancing the practical relevance of research. Production and Operations Management,25(9), 1493–1505. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12558.
van Edig, X. (2016). Video abstracts and video supplements to scientific articles. Experiences from copernicus publications. In: TPDL 2016—Workshop: Videos in digital libraries: What’s in it for libraries, publishers and scientists? Hannover: Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL). https://doi.org/10.5446/19850
Zong, Q. (2019). Response to Dr. Copiello’s comments on “The impact of video abstract on citation counts.” Scientometrics, 120(3), 1499–1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03174-0.
Zong, Q., Xie, Y., Tuo, R., Huang, J., & Yang, Y. (2019). The impact of video abstract on citation counts: Evidence from a retrospective cohort study of New Journal of Physics. Scientometrics,119(3), 1715–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03108-w.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Copiello, S. Digital multimedia tools, research impact, stated and revealed preferences: a rejoinder on the issue of video abstracts. Scientometrics 123, 543–551 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03370-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03370-3