Acton, T. A. (2016). Scientific racism, popular racism and the discourse of the Gypsy Lore Society. Ethnic and Racial Studies,39(7), 1187–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1105988.
Article
Google Scholar
Alliance against Antigypsyism (2016). Antigypsyism. A reference paper. Retrieved January 20, 2020, from www.antigypsyism.eu.
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research,3(1), 993–1022.
MATH
Google Scholar
Bobakova, D., Dankulincova Veselska, Z., Babinska, I., Klein, D., Madarasova Geckova, A., & Cislakova, L. (2015). Differences between Roma and non-Roma in how social support from family and friends helps to overcome health care accessibility problems. International Journal for Equity in Health,14(1), 37.
Article
Google Scholar
Bogdan, M., Dunajeva, J., Junghaus, T., Kóczé, A., Rostas, I., Rövid, M., et al. (2018). Introducing the new journal critical Romani studies. Critical Romani Studies,1(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v1i1.19.
Article
Google Scholar
Bruggeman, J., Traag, V. A., & Uitermark, J. (2012). Detecting communities through network data. American Sociological Review,77(6), 1050–1063.
Article
Google Scholar
Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.
Article
Google Scholar
Costa, C., Schurr, U., Loreto, F., Menesatti, P., & Carpentier, S. (2019). Plant phenotyping research trends, a science mapping approach. Frontiers in Plant Science,9, 1933.
Article
Google Scholar
Földes, M. E., & Covaci, A. (2012). Research on Roma health and access to healthcare: State of the art and future challenges. International Journal of Public Health,57(1), 37–39.
Article
Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. A., Vacca, R., & Stacciarini, J.-M. R. (2017). The emergence of team science: Understanding the state of adoption research through social network analysis. Adoption & Fostering,41(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308575917714714.
Article
Google Scholar
Heaslip, V., Hean, S., & Parker, J. (2016). Lived experience of vulnerability from a Gypsy Roma traveller perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing,25(13–14), 1987–1998.
Article
Google Scholar
Jacquot, S., & Vitale, T. (2014). Law as weapon of the weak? A comparative analysis of legal mobilization by Roma and Women’s groups at the European level. Journal of European Public Policy,21(4), 587–604.
Article
Google Scholar
Kóczé, A., & Rövid, M. (2017). Roma and the politics of double discourse in contemporary Europe. Identities,24(6), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2017.1380338.
Article
Google Scholar
Larsen, P. O., & von Ins, M. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics,84(3), 575–603.
Article
Google Scholar
Liégeois, J. P. (2012). The Council of Europe and Roma: 40 years of action. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,28(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489.
MathSciNet
Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Matras, Y., & Leggio, D. V. (Eds.). (2018). Open borders, unlocked cultures Romanian Roma migrants in Western Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Mayer, N., Michelat, G., Tiberj, V., & Vitale, T. (2019). L’hostilité envers les Roms. La lutte contre le racisme, l’antisémitisme et la xénophobie. Année 2018. Commission nationale consultative des droits de l’homme. Paris: La Documentation française.
McGarry, A. (2017). Romaphobia. The last acceptable form of racism. Zed Books: London.
Google Scholar
Nardi, P., Di Matteo, G., Palahi, M., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2016). Structure and evolution of mediterranean forest research: a science mapping approach. PLoS ONE,11, e0155016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155016.
Article
Google Scholar
Nedelcu, M., & Ciobanu, R. O. (2016). Les migrations des Roms Roumains en Europe. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales,32(1), 7–17.
Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,103(23), 8577–8582.
Article
Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E,69(2), 026113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113.
Article
Google Scholar
Powell, R., & Lever, J. (2017). Europe’s perennial ‘outsiders’: A processual approach to Roma stigmatization and ghettoization. Current Sociology,65(5), 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115594213.
Article
Google Scholar
Quercia, D., Aiello, L. M., & Schifanella, R. (2018). Diversity of indoor activities and economic development of neighborhoods. PLoS ONE,13(6), e0198441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198441.
Article
Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2014). Roma in the News: An examination of media and political discourse and what needs to change. People, Place and Policy,8(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0008.0001.0005.
Article
Google Scholar
Schaub, M. T., Delvenne, J. C., Rosvall, M., & Lambiotte, R. (2017). The many facets of community detection in complex networks. Applied Network Science,2(1), 4.
Article
Google Scholar
Shwed, U., & Bearman, P. S. (2010). The temporal structure of scientific consensus formation. American Sociological Review,75(6), 817–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410388488.
Article
Google Scholar
Toma, S., & Fosztó, L. (2018). Returnees and their neighbors: Migration of the Romanian Roma, networks, social distance, and local development. Review of Sociology,28(4), 37–60.
Google Scholar
Tremlett, A., Messing, V., & Kóczé, A. (2017). Romaphobia and the media: Mechanisms of power and the politics of representations. Identities,24(6), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2017.1380270.
Article
Google Scholar
Vacca, R., McCarty, C., Conlon, M., & Nelson, D. R. (2015). Designing a CTSA-based social network intervention to foster cross-disciplinary team science. Clinical and Translational Science,8(4), 281–289.
Article
Google Scholar
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics,84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Article
Google Scholar
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.2058.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285–320). Cham: Springer.
Google Scholar
van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., van Raan, A. F., Klautz, R. J., & Peul, W. C. (2013). Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE,8, e62395. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062395.
Article
Google Scholar
van Raan, A. F. (2014). Advances in bibliometric analysis: Research performance assessment and science mapping. In W. Blockmans, L. Engwall, & D. Weaire (Eds.), Bibliometrics. Use and abuse in the review of research performance (pp. 17–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar
Vives-Cases, C., Goicolea, I., Hernández, A., Sanz-Barbero, B., Davó-Blanes, M. C., & La Parra-Casado, D. (2017). Priorities and strategies for improving Roma women’s access to primary health care services in cases on intimate partner violence: A concept mapping study. International Journal of Equity Health,16, 1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2013). A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. European Physics Journal B,86, 471. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics,4, 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002.
Article
Google Scholar
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science,316(5827), 1036–1039.
Article
Google Scholar