The journals in physics that publish Nobel Prize research

Abstract

We use the Nobel Foundations Scientific Background material to determine which journals have published Nobel Prize-awarded papers in physics since 1995. Analysing all references in the Nobel Prize Scientific Background material reveals that the journal Physical Review Letters published 28.5% of the Nobel Prize-awarded papers. It is followed by the Astrophysical journal, which accounts for 11.2%, Science, accounting 5.6% and Nature, accounting 4.7%. This is contrary to the journals respective Impact Factors, where Physical Review Letters and the Astrophysical Journal have much lower impact factors than Nature and Science. If works cited for background by the Nobel Foundation in the Scientific Background material are included in the analysis, the most referenced journal is still Physical Review Letters, now followed by Physical Review. The conclusion is that the most ground-breaking scientific work in physics is not necessarily published in the journals with the highest Impact Factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Adam, D. (2002). The counting house. Nature, 415, 726–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baffes, J., & Vamvakidis, A. (2011). Are you too young for the Nobel Prize? Research Policy, 40, 1345–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjørk, R. (2019a). The age at which Noble Prize research is conducted. Scientometrics, 119, 931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bjørk, R. (2019b). Number of citations to individual journals in the Nobel Prize Scientific Background material in physics. https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.8057102.

  5. Campbell, P. (2008). Escape from the impact factor. Ethics in science and environmental politics, 8, 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carbone, P. (2014). Impact factor and research quality. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 17, 34–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan, H. F., Gleeson, L., & Torgler, B. (2014). Awards before and after the Nobel Prize: A Matthew effect and/or a ticket to one’s own funeral? Research Evaluation, 23, 210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan, H. F., Önder, A. S., & Torgler, B. (2015). Do Nobel laureates change their patterns of collaboration following prize reception? Scientometrics, 105, 2215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan, H. F., & Torgler, B. (2013). Science prizes: Time-lapsed awards for excellence. Nature, 500, 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan, H. F., & Torgler, B. (2015). The implications of educational and methodological background for the career success of Nobel laureates: an investigation of major awards. Scientometrics, 102, 847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Falagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Archivum Immunologiae et therapiae Experimentalis, 56, 223–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295, 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones, B. F., & Weinberg, B. A. (2011). Age dynamics in scientific creativity. PNAS, 108, 18910–18914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karazija, R., & Momkauskaitė, A. (2004). The Nobel prize in physics—Regularities and tendencies. Scientometrics, 61, 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manniche, E., & Falk, G. (1957). Age and the Nobel prize. System Research, 2, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Porta, M., Copete, J. L., Fernandez, E., Alguacil, J., & Murillo, J. (2003). Mixing journal, article, and author citations, and other pitfalls in the bibliographic impact factor. Cadernos de saúde pública, 19, 1847–1862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlagberger, E. M., Bornmann, L., & Bauer, J. (2016). At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prizewinning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014. Scientometrics, 109, 723–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1993). Age and the Nobel prize revisited. Scientometrics, 28, 387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner, C. S., Horlings, E., Whetsell, T. A., Mattsson, P., & Nordqvist, K. (2015). Do nobel laureates create prize-winning networks? An analysis of collaborative research in physiology or medicine. PLoS ONE, 10, e0134164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Bjørk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bjørk, R. The journals in physics that publish Nobel Prize research. Scientometrics 122, 817–823 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03312-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nobel Prize
  • Physics
  • Citations
  • Journals
  • Impact Factor