Collaboration with countries with rapidly growing research: supporting proactive development of international research collaboration

Abstract

The academic world is developing rapidly with many new countries becoming significant contributors to research. One important strategic issue is to ensure that the collaboration network develops at least in the same pace as the academic world is developing. This study proposes a new method to compare countries’ growth in research, thus highlighting that Indonesia, Iran and Pakistan are the countries with the highest growth among all countries with more than 10,000 Scopus publications in 2018. A new indicator for collaboration intensity is also proposed, which makes it easy to check to what extent the collaboration pattern incorporates countries with rapid growth. Using Sweden and Indonesia as examples, the study shows differences on national level as well as between different scientific disciplines. Whereas Sweden’s collaboration is very much focusing on other mature research countries with low growth, Indonesia’s collaboration is including other countries with rapid growth. In terms of policy, the study and the proposed methodology support better-informed strategy decisions as regards the prioritisation of countries for research collaboration. It argues that there is a need for strategies and policy support at different levels, if a more balanced mix of research collaboration is to be obtained. To manage rapid changes, it might be necessary to shift from a mainly reactive development of the collaborations to a more proactive one that fosters links to the rapidly developing research countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

References

  1. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Chestnut Hill: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharjee, Y. (2011). Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige. Science,344(6061), 1344–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bladh, A. (2018). En strategisk agenda för internationalisering, SOU 2018:3, see http://www.sou.gov.se/internationaliseringsutredningen/. Retrieved October 2019.

  4. Børing, P., Flanagan, K., Gagliardi, D., Kaloudis, A. & Karakasidou, A. (2015). International mobility: Findings from a survey of researchers in the EU. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elsevier. (2019a). Scopus, see https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus. Retrieved October 2019.

  6. Elsevier. (2019b). SciVal, see https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scival. Retrieved October 2019.

  7. Elsevier. (2019c). SciVal Metrics Guidebook, see https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/resource-library/research-metrics-guidebook. Retrieved October 2019.

  8. Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2012). Foreign-born scientists: Mobility patterns for 16 countries. Nature Biotechnology,30(12), 1250–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics,51(1), 69–115.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H.-J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics,45(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature,430, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwiek, M. (2018). International research collaboration and international research orientation: Comparative findings about European academics. Journal of Studies in International Education,22(2), 136–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s Cosine versus the Jaccard Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(1), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McKelvey, M., & Holmén, M. (2009). Learning to compete in European universities: From social institution to knowledge business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Monroy, S. E., & Diaz, H. (2018). Time series-based bibliometric analysis of the dynamics of scientific production. Scientometrics,115, 1139–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Musselin, C. (2004). Toward a European academic labour market? Some lessons drawn from empirical studies on academic mobility. Higher Education,48(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen, T. V., Ho-Le, T. P., & Le, U. V. (2017). International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: An analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics,110, 1035–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Polyakov, M., Polyakov, S., & Iftekhar, M. S. (2017). Does academic collaboration equally benefit impact of research across topics? The case of agricultural, resource, environmental and ecological economics. Scientometrics,113, 1385–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ribeiro, L. C., Rapini, M. S., Silva, L. A., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2018). Growth patterns of the network if international collaboration in science. Scientometrics,114, 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sandström, U. (2009). Combining curriculum vitae and bibliometric analysis: Mobility, gender and research performance. Research Evaluation,18(2), 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scellato, G., Franzoni, C., & Stephan, P. (2015). Migrant scientists and international networks. Research Policy,44, 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shashnov, S., & Kotsemir, M. (2018). Research landscape of the BRICS countries: Current trends in research output, thematic structures of publications, and the relative influence of partners. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2883-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smeby, J.-C., & Trondal, J. (2005). Globalisation or europeanisation? International contact among university staff. Higher Education,49, 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. The Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century, RS Policy document 03/11. London: The Royal Society.

  25. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2019). Vosviewer, Leiden University's Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS). https://www.vosviewer.com/. Retrieved July 2019.

  26. Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS ONE,10(7), e0131816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialities. Scientometrics,110, 1633–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, J., Hooi, R., Li, A. X. & Chou, M. (2019). Collaboration patterns of mobile academics: The impact of international mobility. Science and Public Policy, 46(3), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wildawsky, B., Kelly, A. P., & Carey, K. (2011). Reinventing higher education: The promise of innovation. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Woldegiyorgis, A. A., Proctor, D., & de Wit, H. (2018). Internationalization of research: Key considerations and concerns. Journal of Studies in International Education,22(2), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, C., & Guo, J. (2017). China’s international research collaboration: Evidence from a panel gravity model. Scientometrics,113, 1129–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Pohl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pohl, H. Collaboration with countries with rapidly growing research: supporting proactive development of international research collaboration. Scientometrics 122, 287–307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03287-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Research
  • International
  • Growth
  • Collaboration
  • Publication