Who reads international Egyptian academic articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley readership categories
- 372 Downloads
Mendeley is a social network that allows researchers worldwide to discover, search and share resources and to cooperate with peer researchers. We can recognize a large amount of exhaustive information about who reads research articles and the contexts in which research articles are read by using data about people who register in Mendeley as readers of articles. The purpose of this paper is to explore different types of users of international Egyptian academic articles indexed in Scopus across four major fields: health sciences, life sciences, physical sciences and social sciences inside and outside academia. The aim is to determine the impact and use of international Egyptian academic articles in Mendeley compared to their citation impact and to explore whether there is any correlation between Mendeley readership counts and the citation indicators for these publications. Furthermore, this study analyses readers’ categories and discovers their country locations according to the data retrieved from Mendeley profiles. The data for this study are collected from the Scopus database. Webometric Analyst 2.0 is used to retrieve Mendeley readership statistics for all collected articles. This information will help in understanding how and to what extent Mendeley readership metrics are applicable in assessing the publications of Egyptian authors and in understanding the usage versus citation pattern and impact of Egyptian scientific outputs on global society. The results indicate that the majority of readers in all disciplines are Ph.D. students, master’s students, and post-graduate students; however, other types of academics are also represented. The findings also indicate that the highest correlations between citations and Mendeley readership counts are found for the types of users who frequently author academic papers, except for professors in some sub-disciplines. Regarding country locations, Egyptian international publications are mostly used by users from more than 100 countries worldwide. However, the majority in every field are from the USA. Overall, this study concludes that Egyptian researchers have great international influence on global society. The study suggests that Mendeley readership may reflect usage similarly to conventional citation impacts if the data are limited to readers who are also authors, without the delay of influence measured by citation indicators. Meanwhile, Mendeley data can disclose the invisible impact of research publications, such as educational value for non-author users inside academia or the impact of research papers on practice for users outside academia. Finally, Mendeley readership statistics can reflect the distribution of users in various countries and potential readers worldwide, identify the invisible impact of the research output per country on global society, and be used as a complementary and informative tool for citation databases in explicating the influence of scientific outputs.
KeywordsAltmetrics Mendeley Egyptian research Research impact Readership analysis
- Armbruster, C. (2008). Access, usage and citation metrics: What function for digital libraries and repositories in research evaluation? Available at SSRN 1088453.Google Scholar
- Brettle, A. J., & Long, A. F. (2001). Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 89(4), 353.Google Scholar
- Erfanmanesh, M., & Didegah, F. (2013). A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus for Iranian publications and citation impact. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 11(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
- Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2014). Mendeley as the source of global readership by students and postdocs? In IATUL conference, Espoo, Finland, June 2–5 2014. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2033&context=iatul.
- Li, X., & Thelwall, M. (2012). F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators.Google Scholar
- Maleki, A. (2015). Mendeley readership impact of academic articles of Iran. In Paper presented at the ISSI.Google Scholar
- Mas Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., & Aguillo, I. (2013). European highly cited scientists’ presence in the social web. In Paper presented at the 14th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference (ISSI 2013).Google Scholar
- Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation (Vol. 9). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Pradhan, P. (2016). Analysis of Mendeley readership activities of Indian information and library science literature indexed in Web of Science. In ICMBL conference, Odisha, India, November 16-17 2016. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pallab_Pradhan2/publication/319664531_Analysis_of_Mendeley_Readership_Activities_of_Indian_Information_and_Library_Science_Literature_indexed_in_Web_of_Science/links/59b8c8770f7e9bc4ca398a0b/Analysis-of-Mendeley-Readership-Activities-of-Indian-Information-and-Library-Science-Literature-indexed-in-Web-of-Science.pdf.
- Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745.
- Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014a). Assessing the impact of the publications read by the different Mendeley users: Is there any different pattern among users? In IATUL conference, Espoo, Finland, June 2-5 2014. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2033&context=iatul.
- Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do Mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited WoS publications better than average citation impact of journals (JCS)? arxiv preprint arXiv:1507.02093.