Abstract
We propose the use of beamplots—which can be produced by using the R package BibPlots and WoS downloads—as a preferred alternative to h index values for assessing single researchers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References
Adams, J., McVeigh, M., Pendlebury, D., & Szomszor, M. (2019). Profiles, not metrics. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate Analytics.
Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2018). Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph. Scientometrics, 115(1), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2658-1.
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014a). Distributions instead of single numbers: Percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 206–208.
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014b). How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations. Scientometrics, 98(1), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1161-y.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L. & Adams, J. R package for producing beamplots as a preferred alternative to the h index when assessing single researchers (based on downloads from Web of Science). Scientometrics 120, 925–927 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03147-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03147-3
Keywords
- Bibliometrics
- h index
- R
- BibPlots
- Citations
- Impact