Self-esteem, self-symbolizing, and academic recognition: behavioral evidence from curricula vitae

Abstract

To provide new evidence on the empirically challenging aspect of measuring self-esteem, we collect written CV content from over 500 influential economics scholars and use such self-presentation modes as absolute and relative font sizes and typographic emphasis of author name on the CV’s front page to derive proxies for self-symbolizing behavior. Our analysis of these factors provides empirical support for the symbolic self-completion proposition that goal accomplishment reduces the need to self-symbolize. In particular, we find that receiving an education from a top 20 ranked university reduces the need to self-symbolize even when the scholars work for a non-top 20 university after earning the doctorate. On the other hand, major academic awards or honors do not seem to affect self-symbolizing behavior, which is also negatively correlated with activities having an external (e.g., policy-focused) social impact. Scholars with a higher h-index are also less inclined to self-symbolize, while being ranked in the Coupé top 1000 has no impact. Hence, despite some evidence of non-linearity, academic maturity shows a tendency (albeit not a robust one) to reduce the need to self-symbolize.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    A respondent’s name letters are randomly assigned to the pair of letter lists from which they are asked to choose one letter in an immediate spontaneous reaction (Krizan and Suls 2008).

  2. 2.

    52,776 authors with written papers and 13,909 without papers.

  3. 3.

    Our findings remain robust to the use of alternative cut-offs.

  4. 4.

    https://ideas.repec.org/coupe.html.

  5. 5.

    Several prominent academics have written broadly successful books (Chan et al. 2016a, b). Achieving a New York Times Best Seller, for example, is positively correlated with higher speaking fees (Chan et al. 2014).

  6. 6.

    https://www.aeaweb.org/about-aea/honors-awards/bates-clark.

  7. 7.

    For a correlation matrix between the independent factors, see Appendix Table 9.

  8. 8.

    Orth et al. (2012), in an in-depth examination of self-esteem across the life span based on cross-sectional data for 326,641 individuals, also report evidence of non-linearity.

References

  1. Aguinis, H., Suarez-Gonzalez, I., Lannelongue, G., & Joo, H. (2012). Scholarly impact revisited. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(2), 105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 380–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness or healthier lifestyle? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1993). When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosson, J. K., Brown, R. P., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Swann, W. B. (2003). Self-enhancement tendencies among people with high explicit self-esteem: The moderating role of implicit self-esteem. Self and Identity, 2(3), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 631–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brady-Amoon, P., & Jairo, F. (2011). Self-efficacy, self-rated abilities, adjustment, and academic performance. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89(4), 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunel, F. F., Tietje, B. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Is the implicit association test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017). How many likes did i get? Purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 232–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cañibano, C., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: The state-of-the-art. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carr, H. L., & Vignoles, V. L. (2011). Keeping up with the joneses: Status projection as symbolic self-completion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 518–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan, H. F., Frey, B. S., Gallus, J., Schaffner, M., Torgler, B., & Whyte, S. (2016a). External influence as an indicator of scholarly importance. CESifo Economic Studies, 62(1), 170–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan, H. F., Frey, B. S., Gallus, J., & Torgler, B. (2014). Academic honors and performance. Labour Economics, 31, 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan, H. F., Mixon, F. G., & Torgler, B. (2018). Relation of early career performance and recognition to the probability of winning the nobel prize in economics. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1069–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan, H. F., Önder, A. S., & Torgler, B. (2016b). The first cut is the deepest: Repeated interactions of coauthorship and academic productivity in nobel laureate teams. Scientometrics, 106(2), 509–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan, H. F., & Torgler, B. (2012). Econometric fellows and nobel laureates in economics. Economics Bulletin, 32(4), 3365–3377.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coopersmith, S. (1959). A method for determining types of self-esteem. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(1), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coupé, T. (2003). Revealed performances: Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments, 1990–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1990–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Houwer, J. (2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them? The Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction, 2, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Denissen, J. J., Penke, L., Schmitt, D. P., & Van Aken, M. A. (2008). Self-esteem reactions to social interactions: Evidence for sociometer mechanisms across days, people, and nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Falk, C. F., & Heine, S. J. (2015). What is implicit self-esteem, and does it vary across cultures? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 297–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Feist, G. J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gaston, J. (1970). The reward system in british science. American Sociological Review, 35(4), 718–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Glänzel, W. (2008). H-index concatenation. Scientometrics, 77(2), 369–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gollwitzer, P. M., Bayer, U., Scherer, M., & Seifert, A. E. (1999). A motivational–volitional perspective on identity development. Action and Self-Development: Theory and Research through the Life Span, 1999, 283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gollwitzer, P. M., Wicklund, R. A., & Hilton, J. L. (1982). Admission of failure and symbolic self-completion: Extending Lewinian theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 358–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure. Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hamermesh, D. S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). The determinants of econometric society fellows elections. Econometrica, 71(1), 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Harmon-Jones, C., Schmeichel, B. J., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Symbolic self-completion in academia: Evidence from department web pages and email signature files. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Henrekson, M., & Waldenström, D. (2011). How should research performance be measured? A study of swedish economists. Manchester School, 79(6), 1139–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Hoshino-Browne, E., & Correll, J. (2003). Secure and defensive high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 969–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kandermir, M., Ilhan, T., Özpolat, A. R., & Palanci, M. (2014). Analysis of academic self-efficacy, self-esteem and coping with stress skills predictive power on academic procrastination. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(5), 146–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Katz, D. A. (1973). Faculty salaries, promotions, and productivity at a large university. American Economic Review, 63(3), 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Krause, S., Back, M. D., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Reliability of implicit self-esteem measures revisited. European Journal of Personality, 25(3), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Krizan, Z., & Suls, J. (2008). Are implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem related? A meta-analysis for the name-letter test. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2), 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lane, J., Lane, A. M., & Kyprianou, A. (2004). Self-efficacy, self-esteem and their impact on academic performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32(3), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (2005). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 2–51). York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lepori, B., & Probst, C. (2009). Using curricula vitae for mapping scientific fields: A small-scale experience for swiss communication sciences. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Litwack, S. D., Aikins, J. W., & Cillessen, A. H. (2012). The distinct roles of sociometric and perceived popularity in friendship: Implications for adolescent depressive affect and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(2), 226–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 703–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Moffitt, J. (2014). The differences between google and bing seo algorithms. Elvin Web Marketing: https://onlinemarketinginct.com/2014/07/10/differences-google-bing-seo-algorithms/.

  50. Nuttin, J. M. (1985). Narcissism beyond gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Orth, U., Robins, R. W., & Widaman, K. F. (2012). Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 435–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sabatier, M., Carrere, M., & Mangematin, V. (2006). Profiles of academic activities and careers: Does gender matter? An analysis based on french life scientist CVs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Salmivalli, C. (2001). Feeling good about oneself, being bad to others? Remarks on self-esteem, hostility, and aggressive behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(4), 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Shaheen, F., & Jahan, M. (2014). Role of self esteem in development of aggressive behavior among adolescents. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(4), 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shapiro, F. R. (1992). Origins of bibliometrics, citation indexing, and citation analysis: The neglected legal literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(5), 337–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Skaalvik, E. M., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1990). Personality processes and individual academic achievement and self-concept: An analysis of causal predominance in a developmental perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Stacy, A. W. (1997). Memory activation and expectancy as prospective predictors of alcohol and marijuana use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(1), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Stefanone, M. A., Lackaff, D., & Rosen, D. (2011). Contingencies of self-worth and social-networking-site behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1–2), 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Steffens, M. C. (2004). Is the implicit association test immune to faking? Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sung, Y., Lee, J. A., Kim, E., & Choi, S. M. (2016). Why we post selfies: Understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tacikowski, P., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2016). Preferential processing of self-relevant stimuli occurs mainly at the perceptual and conscious stages of information processing. Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tafarodi, R. W., & Ho, C. (2006). Implicit and explicit self-esteem: What are we measuring? Canadian Psychology, 47(3), 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Teachman, B. A., Gregg, A. P., & Woody, S. R. (2001). Implicit associations for fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(2), 226–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tice, D. M. (1993). The social motivations of people with low self-esteem. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Low self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 37–53). Boston: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Torgler, B., & Piatti, M. (2013). A century of american economic review: Insights on critical factors in journal publishing. London: Palgrave Pivot.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2003). Death of a (narcissistic) salesman: An integrative model of fragile self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Walker, J., & Knauer, V. (2011). Humiliation, self-esteem and violence. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22(5), 724–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & van Raan, A. F. (2012). Universality of citation distributions revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 72–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2013). Symbolic self-completion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wiers, R. W., Van Woerden, N., Smulders, F. T., & De Jong, P. J. (2002). Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(4), 648–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zimmermann, C. (2013). Academic rankings with RePEc. Econometrics, 1(3), 249–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ho Fai Chan and Benno Torgler benefitted from support by the Australian Research Council (ARC), DP180101169.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benno Torgler.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5678 and 9.

Table 5 Summary statistics of self-esteem proxies
Table 6 Summary statistics on the independent variables
Table 7 Torgler and Piatti aggregate top institutional rankings.
Table 8 Explanatory variables measuring career development
Table 9 Pairwise correlation coefficient of independent variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, W., Chan, H.F. & Torgler, B. Self-esteem, self-symbolizing, and academic recognition: behavioral evidence from curricula vitae. Scientometrics 119, 495–525 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03037-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Self-esteem
  • Self-symbolization
  • Academia
  • Performance
  • Success
  • Recognition