The story behind Oncotarget? A bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Being the most proliferative journal of oncology a cancer research of the past decade, the Open Access journal Oncotarget had reached more than 20,000 publications and a relatively high impact factor score in the past years. In 2018, the journal citation report decided to withdraw the status of an impact factor journal. Since there was a large discussion in the scientific community and specific reasons for the withdrawal were not stated, this bibliometric analysis was performed to assess if Oncotarget exhibits any differences in its bibliometric structure compared to other journals. For this purpose, we used the “New Quality and Quantity Indices in Sciences” platform and analyzed 20,000 Oncotarget articles. Density equalizing mapping technique helps to construct maps of cancer research in Oncotarget and shows that it has led to a unique global landscape which is not asymmetrically dominated by the Western hemisphere but exhibits a publishing architecture with a pronounced emphasis on Chinese articles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Bruggmann, D., Berges, L., Klingelhofer, D., Bauer, J., Bendels, M., Louwen, F., et al. (2017a). Polycystic ovary syndrome: Analysis of the global research architecture using density equalizing mapping. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 34(6), 627–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruggmann, D., Lohlein, L. K., Louwen, F., Quarcoo, D., Jaque, J., Klingelhofer, D., et al. (2015). Caesarean section–a density-equalizing mapping study to depict its global research architecture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(11), 14690–14708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruggmann, D., Maule, L. S., Klingelhofer, D., Schoffel, N., Gerber, A., Jaque, J. M., et al. (2016a). World-wide architecture of osteoporosis research: Density-equalizing mapping studies and gender analysis. Climacteric, 19(5), 463–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruggmann, D., Pulch, K., Klingelhofer, D., Pearce, C. L., & Groneberg, D. A. (2017b). Ovarian cancer: Density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture. International Journal of Health Geographics, 16(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruggmann, D., Richter, T., Klingelhofer, D., Gerber, A., Bundschuh, M., Jaque, J., et al. (2016b). Global architecture of gestational diabetes research: Density-equalizing mapping studies and gender analysis. Nutrition Journal, 15, 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruggmann, D., Wagner, C., Klingelhofer, D., Schoffel, N., Bendels, M., Louwen, F., et al. (2017c). Maternal depression research: Socioeconomic analysis and density-equalizing mapping of the global research architecture. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 20(1), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garfield, E. (1964). Science citation index–a new dimension in indexing. Science, 144(3619), 649–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garfield, E. (1996). How can impact factors be improved? BMJ, 313(7054), 411–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gastner, M. T., & Newman, M. E. (2004). From The cover: Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(20), 7499–7504.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gotting, M., Schwarzer, M., Gerber, A., Klingelhofer, D., & Groneberg, D. A. (2017). Pulmonary hypertension: Scientometric analysis and density-equalizing mapping. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0169238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Groneberg, D. A., Geier, V., Klingelhofer, D., Gerber, A., Kuch, U., & Kloft, B. (2016). Snakebite envenoming—A combined density equalizing mapping and scientometric analysis of the publication history. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(11), e0005046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Groneberg, D. A., Rahimian, S., Bundschuh, M., Schwarzer, M., Gerber, A., & Kloft, B. (2015). Telemedicine—a scientometric and density equalizing analysis. The Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 10, 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Groneberg-Kloft, B., Fischer, T. C., Quarcoo, D., & Scutaru, C. (2009a). New quality and quantity indices in science (NewQIS): The study protocol of an international project. The Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 4, 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Groneberg-Kloft, B., Klingelhoefer, D., Zitnik, S. E., & Scutaru, C. (2013). Traffic medicine-related research: A scientometric analysis. BMC Public Health, 13, 541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Groneberg-Kloft, B., Kreiter, C., Welte, T., Fischer, A., Quarcoo, D., & Scutaru, C. (2008a). Interfield dysbalances in research input and output benchmarking: Visualisation by density equalizing procedures. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7, 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Groneberg-Kloft, B., Quarcoo, D., & Scutaru, C. (2009b). Quality and quantity indices in science: Use of visualization tools. EMBO Reports, 10(8), 800–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Groneberg-Kloft, B., Scutaru, C., Fischer, A., Welte, T., Kreiter, C., & Quarcoo, D. (2009c). Analysis of research output parameters: Density equalizing mapping and citation trend analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Groneberg-Kloft, B., Scutaru, C., Kreiter, C., Kolzow, S., Fischer, A., & Quarcoo, D. (2008b). Institutional operating figures in basic and applied sciences: Scientometric analysis of quantitative output benchmarking. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koster, C., Klingelhofer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Schwarzer, M. (2016). Rotavirus—Global research density equalizing mapping and gender analysis. Vaccine, 34(1), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lankers, P. (2018). Clarivate Analytics Mysteriously De-Indexes Key Journals. from http://www.oncotarget.com/documents/Clarivate-Analytics-Mysteriously-De-Indexes-Key-Journals-NYC-Inquirer.pdf.

  21. Oncotarget. (2017). “Spotlight.” Retrieved 2018-09-17, 2018, from http://www.oncotarget.com.

  22. Oncotarget. (2018). “For authors.” Retrieved 2018-09-17, 2018, from http://www.oncotarget.com/index.php?journal=oncotarget&page=about.

  23. Oncotarget. (2018). “Main Homepage.” Retrieved 2018-03-03, 2018, from http://www.oncotarget.com.

  24. Pendlebury, D. A. (2018). “Standards and Selectivity: Our Enduring Mission.” Retrieved 2018-09-17, 2018, from https://www.clarivate.com/blog/science-research-connect/standards-selectivity-enduring-mission/.

  25. RetractionWatch (2018). “High-profile indexing service punishes 20 journals, issues unusual warning about five others, URL: https://retractionwatch.com/2018/06/26/high-profile-indexing-service-punishes-20-journals-issues-unusual-warning-about-five-others/, accessed Aug 2018.”.

  26. RetractionWatch (2018). “Retraction Watch, Indexing company praises cancer journal, then kicks it out, URL: https://retractionwatch.com/2018/01/19/indexing-company-praises-cancer-journal-kicks/, accessed Aug 2018.”

  27. Schreiber, M., Klingelhofer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Bruggmann, D. (2016). Patient safety: The landscape of the global research output and gender distribution. British Medical Journal Open, 6(2), e008322.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Scutaru, C., Quarcoo, D., Takemura, M., Welte, T., Fischer, T. C., & Groneberg-Kloft, B. (2010). Density-equalizing mapping and scientometric benchmarking in Industrial Health. Industrial Health, 48(2), 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sevinc, A. (2004). Web of science: A unique method of cited reference searching. Journal of the National Medical Association, 96(7), 980–983.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sevinc, A. (2005). Multilingual approach to “Web of Science”. Journal of the National Medical Association, 97(1), 116–117.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vitzthum, K., Scutaru, C., Musial-Bright, L., Quarcoo, D., Welte, T., Spallek, M., et al. (2010). Scientometric analysis and combined density-equalizing mapping of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) research. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zimmer, K. (2017). “Oncotarget Journal Cut from Medline.” The Scientist https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/oncotarget-journal-cut-from-medline-30703.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Groneberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Groneberg, D.A., Fischer, A., Klingelhöfer, D. et al. The story behind Oncotarget? A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 117, 2195–2205 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2949-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Oncotarget
  • Network
  • Bibliometry
  • Architecture
  • Structure