The story behind Oncotarget? A bibliometric analysis
- 913 Downloads
Being the most proliferative journal of oncology a cancer research of the past decade, the Open Access journal Oncotarget had reached more than 20,000 publications and a relatively high impact factor score in the past years. In 2018, the journal citation report decided to withdraw the status of an impact factor journal. Since there was a large discussion in the scientific community and specific reasons for the withdrawal were not stated, this bibliometric analysis was performed to assess if Oncotarget exhibits any differences in its bibliometric structure compared to other journals. For this purpose, we used the “New Quality and Quantity Indices in Sciences” platform and analyzed 20,000 Oncotarget articles. Density equalizing mapping technique helps to construct maps of cancer research in Oncotarget and shows that it has led to a unique global landscape which is not asymmetrically dominated by the Western hemisphere but exhibits a publishing architecture with a pronounced emphasis on Chinese articles.
KeywordsOncotarget Network Bibliometry Architecture Structure
- Bruggmann, D., Lohlein, L. K., Louwen, F., Quarcoo, D., Jaque, J., Klingelhofer, D., et al. (2015). Caesarean section–a density-equalizing mapping study to depict its global research architecture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(11), 14690–14708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lankers, P. (2018). Clarivate Analytics Mysteriously De-Indexes Key Journals. from http://www.oncotarget.com/documents/Clarivate-Analytics-Mysteriously-De-Indexes-Key-Journals-NYC-Inquirer.pdf.
- Oncotarget. (2017). “Spotlight.” Retrieved 2018-09-17, 2018, from http://www.oncotarget.com.
- Oncotarget. (2018). “For authors.” Retrieved 2018-09-17, 2018, from http://www.oncotarget.com/index.php?journal=oncotarget&page=about.
- Oncotarget. (2018). “Main Homepage.” Retrieved 2018-03-03, 2018, from http://www.oncotarget.com.
- Pendlebury, D. A. (2018). “Standards and Selectivity: Our Enduring Mission.” Retrieved 2018-09-17, 2018, from https://www.clarivate.com/blog/science-research-connect/standards-selectivity-enduring-mission/.
- RetractionWatch (2018). “High-profile indexing service punishes 20 journals, issues unusual warning about five others, URL: https://retractionwatch.com/2018/06/26/high-profile-indexing-service-punishes-20-journals-issues-unusual-warning-about-five-others/, accessed Aug 2018.”.
- RetractionWatch (2018). “Retraction Watch, Indexing company praises cancer journal, then kicks it out, URL: https://retractionwatch.com/2018/01/19/indexing-company-praises-cancer-journal-kicks/, accessed Aug 2018.”
- Schreiber, M., Klingelhofer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Bruggmann, D. (2016). Patient safety: The landscape of the global research output and gender distribution. British Medical Journal Open, 6(2), e008322.Google Scholar
- Sevinc, A. (2004). Web of science: A unique method of cited reference searching. Journal of the National Medical Association, 96(7), 980–983.Google Scholar
- Sevinc, A. (2005). Multilingual approach to “Web of Science”. Journal of the National Medical Association, 97(1), 116–117.Google Scholar
- Zimmer, K. (2017). “Oncotarget Journal Cut from Medline.” The Scientist https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/oncotarget-journal-cut-from-medline-30703.