An altmetric investigation of the online visibility of South Korea-based scientific journals
The scientific journal is an important part of scholarly communication and for a long time it has functioned both as the sole dissemination channel of research findings and as an important indicator of research quality. Recently altmetrics have been investigated for their applicability for research assessment. The potential of and hope attached to altmetrics is that they could function as complements to more traditional metrics and possibly reflect some aspects of new forms of online scholarly communication. This research will investigate aggregation of altmetrics at journal-level and the online presence and visibility of selected Korea-based journals. Based on our findings we can conclude that Open Access availability is a clear driver for higher online attention for Korean scientific journals, however, this attention is also heavily influenced by the popularity of a few articles that have attracted significant online attention. Because of the influence some popular articles can have on the aggregated journal-level attention, journal-level altmetrics do not appear to be reliable nor useful indicators of the performance of scientific journals.
KeywordsAltmetrics Scientific journals South Korea Online attention
The authors wish to thank the assistance from Hyo-Chan Park and Young-Suk Paek during data collection.
- Alhoori, H., Choudhury, S., Kanan, T., Fox, E., Furuta, R., & Giles, L. C. (2015). On the relationship between open access and altmetrics. In: The proceedings of the iconference 2015. Retrieved from 2 May 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/73451.
- Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, K. (2018). On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics vs. citations for Finnish articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23934.Google Scholar
- Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access vs. non OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved from May 2, 2018. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html.
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548). Retrieved from October 10, 2017. http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351.
- Leonelli, S. (2017). MLE on open science—Incentives and rewards to engage in open science activities (Thematic report no. 3). Brussels, European Commission, 2017. Retrieved from May 4, 2018. https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/library/mle-open-science-%E2%80%93-altmetrics-and-rewards-incentives-and-rewards-engage-open-science.
- Loach, T. V., & Evans, T. S. (2015). Ranking journals using altmetrics. In: The proceedings of the 15th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference held in Istanbul on 30th June to 2nd July 2015.Google Scholar
- O’Carroll, C., et al. (2017). Evaluation of research careers fully acknowledging open science practices. Brussels, European Commission, 2017. Retrieved from May 4, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=rewards_wg.
- Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto, 26 October 2010. Retrieved from May 4, 2018. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
- Wilsdon, J., et al. (2017). Next-generation metrics: Responsible metrics and evaluation for open science. Report of the European Commission Expert Group on Altmetrics. Brussels, European Commission, March 2017. Retrieved from May 4, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/report.pdf.