Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 1975–1994 | Cite as

Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal

  • Naser Rashidi
  • Hussein Meihami
Article
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

The research abstracts have significant functions in the process of conveying information about each research. This is much important in the scientometrics field due to the informative nature of it. The information which a research abstract provides can be of different types. That said, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the information provided by the research abstracts published in the Scientometrics journal during 1978–2017. To that end, we used a rhetorical move analysis method to analyze the research abstracts of the Scientometrics journal. In this study, 4214 research abstracts in 113 volumes of the Scientometrics journal were extracted from the original papers and reports and examined for their information based on Hyland’s (Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing, Longman London, 2000) five-move model. The results indicated that most of the information provided by the research abstracts during each decade of the journal publication and as a whole, was on method and results of the studies. Nevertheless, the least information both during each decade of the journal publication and as a whole, was on the conclusion of the studies. The results also revealed that there was a positive trajectory of development regarding information about introduction and purpose of the studies in the research abstracts. Thus, it can be concluded that there are some reasons such as situational options, community of practice, and the extent of the explicitness of the information which have effects on the information provided by the research abstracts.

Keywords

Scientometrics Research abstracts Rhetorical move analysis Method 

References

  1. Anderson, K., & Maclean, J. (1997). A genre analysis study of 80 medical abstracts. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 8, 1–23.Google Scholar
  2. Bhatia, V. (1994). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional setting. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Blatt, E. M. (2009). Differentiating, describing, and visualizing scientific space: A novel approach to the analysis of published scientific abstracts. Scientometrics, 80(2), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonn, S., & Swales, J. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language science: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves on education essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doró, K. (2013). The rhetoric structure of research article abstracts in English studies journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219–228). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Gesuato, S. (2009). Encoding of information in titles: Practices across four genres in linguistics. In C. Taylor (Ed.), Ecolingua: The role of e-corpora in translation and language learning (pp. 125–157). Trieste: EUT.Google Scholar
  10. Graetz, N. (1985). Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. In J. M. Ulijn & A. K. Pugh (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes: Studies and practices in native and foreign languages (pp. 123–135). London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  11. Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attractions. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartley, J. (2004). Current findings from research on structured abstracts. Journal of Medical Library Association, 92(3), 368–371.Google Scholar
  13. Hartley, J., Pennebaker, J. W., & Fox, C. (2003). Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style? Scientometrics, 57(3), 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  15. Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  16. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ibáñez Orellana, R., Moncada Nahuelquín, F., & Santana Covarrubias, A. (2015). Organización retórica y relaciones de coherencia en el abstract de biología. Estudios filológicos, 56, 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ibáñez, R., & Moncada, F. (2017). El Resumen de artículos de investigación científica. Spanish in Context, 14(2), 273–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johns, T. (1991). It is presented initially: Linear dislocation and inter-language strategies in Brazilian academic abstracts in English and Portuguese. Ilha do Desterro, 27(1), 9–32.Google Scholar
  20. Kumar, M. J. (2013). Making your research paper discoverable: Title plays the winning trick. IETE Technical Review, 30(5), 361–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewin, B. A., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Loi, C. K., & Evans, M. S. (2010). Cultural differences in the organization of research article introductions from the field of educational psychology: English and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2814–2825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lorés-Sanz, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorés-Sanz, R. (2014). Lost (and gained) in translation: A contrastive (English/Spanish) analysis of rhetorical and lexicogrammatical patterns in sociology research article abstracts. In Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, 85109.Google Scholar
  25. Marefat, H., & Mohammadzadeh, S. (2013). Genre analysis of literature research article abstracts: Cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study. Applied Research on English Language, 2(2), 37–50.Google Scholar
  26. Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1–19.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nalimov, V., & Mulcjenko, B. (1971). Measurement of science: Study of the development of science as an information process. Washington, DC: Foreign Technology Division.Google Scholar
  29. Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H. D. (2009). A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of chemical abstracts. Scientometrics, 78(2), 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nwogu, K. N. (1990). Discourse variation in medical texts: Schema, theme and cohesion on professional and journalistic accounts. Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  31. Paltridge, B. (1994). Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 288–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pho, P. D. (2009). Linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure: A corpus-based study of research article abstracts and introductions in applied linguistics and educational technology. Language and Computers, 71(1), 135–152.Google Scholar
  33. Pinto, M. (2006). A grounded theory on abstracts quality: Weighting variables and attributes. Scientometrics, 69(2), 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Porush, D. A. (1995). Short guide to writing about science. New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publisher.Google Scholar
  35. Rashidi, N., & Ghaffarpour, H. (2012). An analysis of English and Persian academic written discourses in human sciences: An evolutionary account. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 29(3), 87–105.Google Scholar
  36. Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language thesis. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rotto, E., & Morgan, R. P. (1997). An exploration of expert-based text analysis techniques for assessing industrial relevance in US engineering dissertation abstracts. Scientometrics, 40(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sahragard, R., & Meihami, H. (2016). A diachronic study on the information provided by the research titles of applied linguistics journals. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1315–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research and text type. Text, 10(4), 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Santos, M. (1996). The text organization of research papers abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481–499.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tseng, F. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zand-Moghadam, A., & Meihami, H. (2016). A rhetorical move analysis of TEFL thesis abstracts: The case of Allameh Tabataba’i University. Issues in Language Teaching, 5(1), 23-1.Google Scholar

Research abstracts examined in the study

  1. Gilbert, G. (1978). Measuring the growth of science: A review of indicators of scientific growth. Scientometrics, 1(1), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Guay, Y. (1988). Internationalization of industrial research: The pharmaceutical industry; 1965–1979. Scientometrics, 13(5–6), 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kirchner, M. K., Košťál, Ľ., Bilčík, B., & Winckler, C. (2017). Mapping farm animal welfare research in an enlarged Europe: International collaboration, bibliometric output, research resources and relation to economic indices. Scientometrics, 113(2), 909–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Krauskopf, M., & Inés Vera, M. (1997). Assessment of scientific profiles and capabilities of Ph.D. programs in Chile: A Scientometric approach. Scientometrics, 40(3), 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations