Research contributions of international branch campuses to the scientific wealth of academically developing countries

Abstract

A majority of international branch campuses (IBCs) have been established during the last two decades, with China, Malaysia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates being the countries hosting the largest numbers. IBCs are often considered education providers within the host country; but there has been ongoing debate about their role as contributors to the scientific wealth of the host country. This study develops a methodology to investigate the research activity at branch campuses based on their publications. The main methodological challenge was to identify publications from these entities, as they are often not indexed and visible in the publication databases. This was solved through a search query extracting publications with affiliation data including the host country or city for the branch campus as well as the name of the institution. Using the publication sets for each research active IBC, the study illustrates not only that they are increasingly active in research, but also how their publication quality and collaboration patterns relate to their host country as well as to their home institution. The results also indicate that IBCs appear to have a role in the academic research development of some hosting countries; Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Malaysia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. CBERT. (2017). Cross-border education research team branch campus listing. [Data originally collected by Kevin Kinser and Jason E. Lane]. Albany, NY: CBERT. http://cbert.org/branchcampuses.php. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.

  2. Chambers, G., & Cummings, W. K. (1990). Profiting from education: Japan-United States international education ventures in the 1980s. IIE research report 20, Institute for International Education, New York.

  3. De Wit, H. (2009). Measuring success in the internationalisation of higher education. EAIE occasional paper 22, EAIE, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  4. Elsevier. (2014). SciVal metrics guidebook. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/53327/scival-metrics-guidebook-v1_01-february2014.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.

  5. Elsevier. (2017a). Scopus. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.

  6. Elsevier. (2017b). SciVal. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scival. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.

  7. Garrett, R., Kinser, K., Lane, J. E., & Merola, R. (2016). International branch campuses: Trends and developments, 2016. London: The Observatory for Borderless Higher Education and Cross Border Education Research Team.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garrett, R., Kinser, K., Lane, J. E., & Merola, R. (2017). International branch campuses: Success factors of mature IBCs, 2017. London: The Observatory for Borderless Higher Education and Cross Border Education Research Team.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez-Brambila, C. N., Reyes-Gonzalez, L., Veloso, F., & Perez-Angón, M. A. (2016). The scientific impact of developing nations. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0151328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2017). A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: A study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK. Scientometrics, 111, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lane, J. E. (2011a). Global expansion of international branch campuses: Managerial and leadership challenges. In J. E. Lane & K. Kinser (eds) Multinational colleges and universities: Leading, governing and managing international branch campuses, New directions for higher education, 155. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  14. Lane, J. E. (2011b). Importing private higher education: International branch campuses. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(4), 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lane, J. E. (2012). Higher education and economic competitiveness. In J. E. Lane & D. B. Johnstone (Eds.), Universities and colleges as economic drivers: Measuring and building success (pp. 1–30). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lane, J. E., & Kinser, K. (2011). Reconsidering privatization in cross-border (higher education) engagements: The sometimes public nature of private activity. Higher Education Policy, 24, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lane, J. E., & Owens, T. (2012). The International Dimensions of Economic Development. In J. E. Lane & D. B. Johnstone (Eds.), Universities and colleges as economic drivers: Measuring and building success (pp. 205–238). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lane, J. E., & Pohl, H. (2017). Research capacity building and branch campuses. International Higher Education, 89, 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s Cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275(5301), 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McBurnie, G., & Ziguras, C. (2007). Transnational education: Issues and trends in offshore higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pohl, H., Warnan, G., & Baas, J. (2014). Level the playing field in scientific collaboration with the use of a new indicator: Field-Weighted Internationalization Score. Research Trends, 39, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prathap, G. (2017). Scientific wealth and inequality of nations. Scientrometrics, 113(2), 923–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. RS Policy document 03/11, The Royal Society, London, UK.

  25. Vosviewer. (2017). Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Leiden: Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0131816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wildavsky, B. (2010). The great brain race: How global universities are reshaping the world. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Pohl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pohl, H., Lane, J.E. Research contributions of international branch campuses to the scientific wealth of academically developing countries. Scientometrics 116, 1719–1734 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2790-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • International branch campus
  • IBC
  • Bibliometric analysis