The evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena in scholarly networks: the case of the strategic management journal
- 421 Downloads
Understanding how a scientist develops new scientific collaborations or how their papers receive new citations is a major challenge in scientometrics. The approach being proposed simultaneously examines the growth processes of the co-authorship and citation networks by analyzing the evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena. In particular, the preferential attachment function and author fitnesses, which govern the two phenomena, are estimated non-parametrically in each network. The approach is applied to the co-authorship and citation networks of the flagship journal of the strategic management scientific community, namely the Strategic Management Journal. The results suggest that the abovementioned phenomena have been consistently governing both temporal networks. The average of the attachment exponents in the co-authorship network is 0.30 while it is 0.29 in the citation network. This suggests that the rich get richer phenomenon has been weak in both networks. The right tails of the distributions of author fitness in both networks are heavy, which imply that the intrinsic scientific quality of each author has been playing a crucial role in getting new citations and new co-authorships. Since the total competitiveness in each temporal network is founded to be rising with time, it is getting harder to receive a new citation or to develop a new collaboration. Analyzing the average competency, it was found that on average, while the veterans tend to be more competent at developing new collaborations, the newcomers are likely better at acquiring new citations. Furthermore, the author fitness in both networks has been consistent with the history of the strategic management scientific community. This suggests that coupling node fitnesses throughout different networks might be a promising new direction in analyzing simultaneously multiple networks.
KeywordsAuthor fitness Citation network Co-authorship network Preferential attachment Power-law Scale free network First-mover advantage
The authors thank the two reviewers for interesting suggestions on a previous version of the manuscript. We also express our gratitude to Professors Luis Ángel Guerras-Martin and Anoop Madok for interesting comments on the links between fittest authors with their lines of research.
This study was financed by FONDECYT, Chile, grant number 1180200 to Professor Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo.
- Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4371(02)00736-7.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J. M., Helbing, D., Kuhnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(17), 7301–7306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610172104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows (Version 6.165): Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00217.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guerras-Martin, L. Á., & Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2013). Strategic management journal. In M. Augier & D. J. Teece (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management (pp. 1–5). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Katz, J. S. (2016a). Policies considerations for evidence-based measures of complex innovation systems. Paper presented at the SPRU 50th aniversary conference, University of Sussex, Brighton UK.Google Scholar
- Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frecuency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323. doi:http://www.jstor.org/stable/i24527553.
- Neophytou, J. (2014). How to navigate the world of citation metrics. Retrieved from http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog/2014/05/15/how-to-navigate-the-world-of-citation-metrics/.
- Persson, O. R., & Danell, J. W. S. (2009). How to use bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In R. F. Åström, B. Danell, & J. S. Larsen (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday (pp. 9–24). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.Google Scholar
- Pham, T., Sheridan, P., & Shimodaira, H. (2018). PAFit: an R Package for the non-parametric estimation of preferential attachment and node fitness in temporal complex networks. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06017.
- Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Guerras-Martín, L. Á. (2010). Dynamics of the scientific community network within the strategic management field through the Strategic Management Journal 1980–2009: the role of cooperation. Scientometrics, 85(3), 821–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0287-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Guerras-Martín, L. Á. (2013). Red de cooperación institucional de investigación en dirección de empresas en España en torno a la revista CEDE: 1998–2010. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rupp, D. E., Thornton, M. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Olien, J. L., & Berka, G. (2014). The characteristics of quality scholarly submissions: Considerations of author team composition and decision making. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314547387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strategic Management Society. (2014). SMS awards and honors. Retrieved from https://www.strategicmanagement.net/awards/smj-best-paper.
- Tahai, A., & Meyer, M. J. (1999). A revealed preference study of management’s journal direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199903)20:3<279::AID-SMJ33>3.0.CO;2-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar