, Volume 115, Issue 3, pp 1185–1198 | Cite as

An EU without the UK: mapping the UK’s changing roles in the EU scientific research

  • Zhigang HuEmail author
  • Gege Lin
  • Taian Sun
  • Xianwen WangEmail author


In science, technology and innovation, the consequences of Britain’s exit (Brexit) for both Britain and the Europe Union (EU) are still uncertain. However, there is no doubt that in the years to come, the UK will need to re-calibrate its scientific collaborations with other EU countries. In this research, we aim to identify which EU countries would suffer the greatest loss and which research fields would be most affected by Brexit. Based on the scientific output of each EU country, as indexed by the Web of Science, we demonstrate that international scientific collaboration frequently involves the UK. We also define four types of roles according to the UK’s performance in production and collaboration; these roles are of great significance to our understanding of the status of the UK in the EU. In this sense, the UK acted as a leader in health sciences, a pioneer in social sciences, an assistant in physical sciences, and a participant in engineering.


Brexit Scientific collaboration European Union United Kingdom 



The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. 71503031 and 71673038, as well as the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No. 2016M591435.


  1. Ackers, L. (2008). Internationalisation, mobility and metrics: A new form of indirect discrimination? Minerva, 46, 411–435. Scholar
  2. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87(1), 63–74. Scholar
  3. Borsi, B., & Schubert, A. (2011). Agrifood research in Europe: A global perspective. Scientometrics, 86(1), 133–154. Scholar
  4. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G. I. P., Sampson, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2016a). The consequences of Brexit for UK trade and living standards. London: The Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from
  5. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2016b). The impact of Brexit on foreign investment in the UK. London: The Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from
  6. Elsevier, & BIS, U. (2013). International comparative performance of the UK research base-2013. London. Retrieved from
  7. Elsevier. (2016). International comparative performance of the UK research base 2016. London. Retrieved from
  8. European Commission. (2015). EU expenditure and revenue 2007–2013. Retrieved October 6, 2015, from
  9. Golding, B. T. (2017). The impact of Brexit on British science: Also Sprach Zunderland. Future Medicinal Chemistry, 9(3), 271–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673. Scholar
  11. Irwin, G. (2015). BREXIT: The impact on the UK and the EU. Global Counsel. Dostupno Na: https://www.Global-Counsel.Co.Uk/analysis/special-Report/brexit-Impact-Uk-and-Eu. September 29, 2016.
  12. Kierzenkowski, R., Pain, N., Rusticelli, E., & Zwart, S. (2016). The economic consequences of Brexit: A taxing decision. OECD Economic Policy Papers, (16), 1–27. Retrieved from
  13. Kirchner, M. K., Košťál, Ľ., Bilčík, B., & Winckler, C. (2017). Mapping farm animal welfare research in an enlarged Europe: International collaboration, bibliometric output, research resources and relation to economic indices. Scientometrics, 113(2), 909–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nita, A., Rozylowicz, L., Manolache, S., Cioc, M., Miu, I. V., & Popescu, V. D. (2016). Collaboration networks in applied conservation projects across Europe. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0164503. Scholar
  15. Ovalle-Perandones, M.-A. A., Gorraiz, J., Wieland, M., Gumpenberger, C., & Olmeda-Gómez, C. (2013). The influence of European Framework Programmes on scientific collaboration in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 97(1), 59–74. Scholar
  16. Pisani-Ferry, J., Röttgen, N., Sapir, A., Tucker, P., & Wolff, G. B. (2016). Europe after Brexit: A proposal for a continental partnership. Brussels: Bruegel External Publication.Google Scholar
  17. Richard, W., Sugimoto, C. R., Robinson-Garcia, N., Murray, D. S., Yegros-Yegros, A., Costas, R., et al. (2017). Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move. Nature, 550(7674), 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. The Royal Society. (2015). UK research and the European Union: The role of the EU in funding UK research. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  19. UK Office for National Statistics. (2015). UK government expenditure on science, engineering and technology. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from
  20. Ukrainski, K., Masso, J., & Kanep, H. (2014). Cooperation patterns in science within Europe: The standpoint of small countries. Scientometrics, 99(3), 845–863. Scholar
  21. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. Scholar
  22. Wadsworth, J., Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Brexit and the impact of immigration on the UK. London. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WISE LabDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations